User talk:Mafiaboss14

February 2019
Hello, I'm Ifnord. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Frank Cali, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 22:41, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Frank Cali. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ''Source cited does not support this. Please see WP:CITE to learn how to add references for controversial additions.'' Ifnord (talk) 22:47, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

This isn't incorrect
Stop changing it Mafiaboss14 (talk) 22:49, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This is especially important when adding allegations of criminality. Breaking sticks (talk) 22:52, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Frank Cali. Ifnord (talk) 00:00, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Frank Cali shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Ifnord (talk) 03:14, 21 February 2019 (UTC)