User talk:MaganWurth13/sandbox

Article Evaluation Humorism article. All of the notes and charts in the article seemed relevant. I didn't find anything distracting on this page. The article did not have any biases. All of the information came from a variety of sources. The viewpoints presented illustrate all the different sides including a comparison to modern medical practice. Although the article was missing a couple of citations, the ones that I tested were working and pertinent to the article. The sources used are academic journals, dictionaries, and textbooks. These neutral sources are acceptable for Wikipedia and research, in general. I do not feel that the article is missing anything major. In fact, I appreciated the additional information regarding Ayurvedic medicine, a comparable humor-based style of medical theory. On the article's Talk page, other Wikipedians took issue with a table that is presented. It appears to have some information displayed incorrectly. Additionally, other editors have attempted to clean up the page's citations. This article has been rated as a Start class and a B class. It is included as "of interest" to several Wikiprojects: Religion/Interfaith, Neopaganism, Medicine, and History of Science. The article highlights many of the points that we covered in class. Additionally, it covers a bit on Ayurvedic medicine.