User talk:Magda wojtyra

Digital printing
If you look at the diffs, I was simply changing the phrase "real photo paper" to the more accurate "photographic paper." "Real photo paper" implies that there exists "fake photo paper." OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:41, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

There needs to be a distiction between emulsion based, light sensitive photo paper ("real" photo paper) and paper for inkjet printing that is non-light sensitive, often highly glossy and sometimes eggshell textured. The former is a real photograph, the other is an inkjet print, a product designed specifically to mimic the look of light sensitive paper photographs. Is not one real and the other fake? ;)
 * Using the word "fake" implies intent to deceive, which is not the case here. I'm not an expert on the topic, but surely there is a better way to distinguish between inkjet photo paper and traditional light sensitive photo paper. OhNo itsJamie  Talk 00:59, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

I never used the word "fake" - that's your word from the comment. I used the word "true". I do happen to be an expert on the topic, and semantics are also important to me as they are to you, so I can appreciate your concern. Take a look at what is there now, I think it's more accurate, though longer.

And, although the product is not designed to deceive, it is designed to imitate - zirconia is not designed to deceive as a diamond, but it is often thought of as a fake diamond, and in the context of zirconia on the market, a diamond is a "true" diamond.

There is a big difference between real, true photographic paper and "photographic paper" that is just glossy paper that an inkjet printer can use to print a "photograph", most notably with colour fastness.

Orphaned non-free image File:TheScientist cover Sept-2010.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TheScientist cover Sept-2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheScientist cover Sept-2010.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TheScientist cover Sept-2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 23 October 2019 (UTC)