User talk:Magenta.lily

Linear algebra notation consistency
I've been going around making matrix transpose notation consistent with that used in the transpose article. In particular, anything like  or   gets replaced with. That means that instead of $$ A^T$$ or $$ A^\mathsf{T}$$, the convention is $$ A^\operatorname{T}$$.

Additionally, I have been trying to make bold-facing of matrices consistent within articles. I have come across quite a few articles where a matrix is denoted as $$ \mathbf A$$ is one section but as $$A$$ in the next. I have been biasing towards whatever is most prominent on the page and what appears the earliest. I have been replacing all instances of $$\boldsymbol A$$ with $$\mathbf A$$ as the latter is used most frequently in significant linear algebra articles. However, if a Greek letter is used to represent a matrix (such as $$\boldsymbol \beta$$ in Generalized least squares), I am inserting  to ensure it appears bold when other Latin-letter matrices are bolded.

Any feedback or thoughts on this are greatly appreciated.

Pages worked on:

Magenta.lily (talk) 18:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

 Random generalized Lotka–Volterra model, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Random_generalized_Lotka%E2%80%93Volterra_model help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}.

Thanks again, and happy editing! User:The Herald|The Herald (Benison) (User talk:The Herald|talk) 18:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Consumer-resource model has been accepted
 Consumer-resource model, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top {AfC talk/B percentage} of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Consumer-resource_model help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}.

Thanks again, and happy editing! User:14 novembre|14 novembre (User talk:14 novembre|talk) 08:26, 19 March 2024 (UTC) <! --Template:AfC talk-- >

March 2024
Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Pankaj Mehta, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. < ! -- Template:uw-own1 -- > Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User:User4edits|User4edits (User talk:User4edits|T) 05:31, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Magenta.lily. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Pankaj Mehta, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {tl|edit COI} template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see {Section link|Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI});
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see {Section link|Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming});
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.<! -- THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY SHOULD BE REMOVED IF THE USER IS BLOCKED, OR IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS USER DOES NOT HAVE A COI, OR THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION. -- > < !-- Template:uw-coi -- > Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User:User4edits|User4edits (User talk:User4edits|T) 05:31, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

I've commented-out this conflict of interest template from my talk page because there has been no explicit evidence presented to support the accusation and "THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION" (see above). Please re-add this if you think a COI persists, and please provide evidence.

-->