User talk:MagggieR

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. We encourage you to read our instructions for students. Your instructor may wish to add your class to our list of school and university projects and s/he may want to read these instructions for teachers. For more help about educational projects using Wikipedia, see our classroom coordination project.

Here are some other pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

It is highly recommend that you place this text:  on the discussion page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and should be treated accordingly.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished!

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 23:51, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Weddings in the United States
A tag has been placed on Weddings in the United States requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  21:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I have userfied your page here: User:MagggieR/Weddings in the United States. You can move it back to Weddings in the United States when you think it passes the this qualification (you may want to let me know when you want it moved and I'll do so for you guys). Thanks to the redirect created by the user who took interest in your article (which was redirected, not deleteD), you can see that there is some existing content at Wedding which your group is welcome to incorporate into your article. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 21:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Draft review comments posted
Please see my comments at User talk:MagggieR/Weddings in the United States. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 02:58, 15 July 2009 (UTC)


 * My advice is to work as good as you can, and try to finish the article and submit it to Good Article Review before the end of this week. I will certainly take into account that you are the most active person in the group! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 02:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Weddings in the United States
This has been on hold for well over a week. While some of my concerns have been addressed, I feel that the article is still not ready for GA status. If you can improve the article, feel free to renominate it; if you disagree with my assessment, you can request a reassessment. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 00:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC)