User talk:Maggini1

Image copyright problem with Image:GioraNYC.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:GioraNYC.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

August 2010
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Michal Schmidt, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Don't remove the maintenance tags. --moreno oso (talk) 00:46, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Michal Schmidt, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Don't do this again. --moreno oso (talk) 03:28, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles, as you did to Michal Schmidt, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You may edit your article but don't remove the tags. --moreno oso (talk) 03:43, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michal Schmidt
A tag has been placed on Michal Schmidt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --moreno oso (talk) 04:00, 11 August 2010 (UTC)