User talk:Maggott2000

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

/Archive 1

009Mike
I am sorry, Because I was don't know about these lies -- Commander 009Mike 10 : 39 14 June 2007 (UTC).

009Mike
(Black And Blue) Like Source Avril Lavigne (Let Go) 18 : 35 20 June 2007 (UTC).

009Mike
Please don't doing this, The source so vivid , You search in net to know 12 : 8 23 June 2007 (UTC).

Tina Turner
hi there! thanks for letting me know that....well i don't know if they'll be removed but i tagged them all. yes i undrestand you but no award has been given to Nana Mouskoury too and in real life she is the biggest selling female artist of all time with sales over 300 million. The title that has been mentioned for Tina has a source: biography.com, which is reputable(maybe she wasn't awarded because there is no award for the most successful rock female artist). does the pat or stevie article has a reputable source saying that? Please let me know. Thanks once again :).Salmoria 23 June 2007 (UTC).

Best selling list
I added a comment in your request for the changes in the list, I agree with you in every thing, but what do you think, will they change the list?? Salmoria 2 july 2007 (UTC)

Yes i know but i'll try to get more people to support, i'll talk to some friends. Salmoria 16:14 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry but I reversed your edit(Best selling list) based on the following: the source says 180 million and doesn't say if the sales include the period with Ike just says that by 2000 she has sold 180 million.

Ok I just felt that i needed to let you know that. Did you read the comments of your suggestion in the best selling list recently? There is an user that disagree with you, well we are arguing, let's wait and see what happen. Salmoria 20:17 4 July 2007 (UTC)

The Backstreet Boys
Please Stop Doing This Please, Would You Can't The ........? Oh I am Sorry 3 july 2007 (UTC)

Very impossible
Sale Black And Blue 15 million - 14 million copies worldwide. in end of (2000) and beginning (2001), And also impossible be sales as in your view now. Very impossible Very, Remember Black And Blue Sale 5 million in his first week 0 : 39 4 july 2007 (UTC). .

Black And Blue
This location not forum [www.espacioblog.com] in page Discos mas vevdidos desde el 2000 Top 15 de los

tina turner album sales
OMG you're right! i didn't see that. and the worst is that I eddited her discography.thank you. Salmoria 21:39 4 july 2007(UTC).

?
The First Album Sale 34 Million Backstreet Boys (US) It's True Or No.

Oh My God
Which Sale 34 Million Albums, What Is It ? Backstreet Boys ( International ) Or Backstreet Boys ( US ) Or ( Backstreet's Back ) 9 july 2007(UTC).

tina turner sales
hi there! thank you, I did understand :) Salmoria 17:00 9 July 2007

Tell Me
Tell Me, Where I Erroneous Please ? So That I Know 10 july 2007(UTC).

'"all the best'" pic
hi, can you help me?, the following pictures aren't appearing in the article, however they appear in the preview, do you know why? Image:51QNTYA0ADL. AA240 all the.jpg and Image:Whats album.jpg. Salmoria 18:09 10 july 2007

Sale
Please Stop I Don't Lie Please Stop Doing This 11 july 2007(UTC).

............
I don't know who you meaning But My IP in problem right now  Ok, I am with you about Millennium Sale 30 million albums worldwide , But Backstreet Boys ( US ) the most successful debut album in history and sale 30 million albums worldwide , it's sale 28 million albums in 1999  and now 2007 , After ( Never Gone ) Song ( Everybody ) she became Very popularity return for the boys , And this song became Celebrated for the boys in east asia and the all world , Thanks 21:1 16 july 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia What you want more ? . 9:44 17 july 2007


 * 87.101.244.8, 87.101.244.9, 212.107.116.xxx, 212.62.97.xxx It is obvious you are all the same person using multiple IP addresses. Please note that you need to have a verified reference to be able to have it allowed as an amendment. This means no blogs, forums, newsgroups, or any site where just anyone can edit. You also need to make sure that the reference that you are using is actually referring to the subject, which the one I have reversed 20 times over on all these IP addresses is not - and I have told this many times over. Please read up on WP:VR and become a good wikipedia editor rather that the nuisance you are now. Maggott2000 10:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

the mars
Hi, are you can removing protection template in Backstreet Boys ? Please Tanks 8 July 2007 (UTC).

Is there any way we can get these articles semi protected, it is becoming offer baring to maintain it between the 2 of us, semi protection would help.[] and[] thanx. Realist2 10:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Bing Crosby
Hi there, Maggott2000. I have found a reference stating that Bing Crosby sold 400 million at the time of his death. It looks pretty good to me, so I have added Bing Crosby to the 250 million plus class.What do you think? AussieBoy 01:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

problem
there seems to be a serious problem with the links at the bottom of this article, I first noticed it for the beatles article but it noe affects all claims that use source 14. Help []. Realist2 19:45, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Madonna (entertainer)
Your assessment of the sales data being used on this article is incorrect. All articles are made up of mix and match of details as they are found and sourced. In this particular case, there is one reference that specifies the singles sold, and there is one article that is a "better"(IFPI) source that specifies albums sales. These are referencing two specific and quite different facts. It is not an attempt to enlarge the sales of the articles subject. It is using the verified sources to specify the facts. There is nothing wrong with the IFPI article specifying the album sales regardless of whether the other source also reports the sales data. You will also find this common place in any of the sales figures mentioned in any artists sales. In most cases if IFPI, RIAA, UWC, or press releases by the record companies take preference over other sources - as has been done this time Maggott2000 07:26, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, it is your assessment of sales data that is incorrect. It is well-known that "album sales" are often taken to mean total worldwide sales; not every source will specify x amount of albums and x amount of singles. What many editors are doing (the Madonna article being the most-potent example) is to combine two different sources, using the highest figures of each source to suit their purpose.


 * Let's look at it a different way. Do you think the editors would have used the IFPI source if it stated, for example, that Madonna's sales were 150 million "albums"? I doubt it.


 * It's irrelevant that this practice exists in other articles. That doesn't make it right, and I'll try to correct it when I see it. I can never understand the fuss about who has sold more... Oran e   (talk)  07:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * responses in both Users talkpage and the Madonna (entertainer) discussion page. All comments to dat have been pov. Maggott2000

On holiday
From 10/09/07 - 19/09/07 will be on holiday and probably without internet access. Thereore my "silence" on pages I assist on is for this reason, Best of luck to the other editors who assist in the fight to maintain the articles free of vandalism. Please be professional in your edits, be civil, consistant, and above all else, reference as much as you can with veified links ... not forums, blogs, user homepages etc ... tasks:
 * Madonna (entertainer) needs a new lead paragraph, and discussion on the neutrality tag
 * Celine Dion article needs way more referencing
 * List of best selling music artists is too demanding against vandalism. It has been suggested that it be tagged for removal. For sanity alone, I would support this. Same with many other lists on wiki.
 * Kylie Minogue discography, Madonna Discography, Cher discography, Backstreet Boys Discography, Eminem discography always being vandalised with sales hiking. Keep to the references.
 * Whitney Houston, Mariah Carey - more referencing

Agreed I believe the artist and album pages should be deleted. Realist2 18:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Back?
Hi there. Hope you enjoyed you trip/"holiday."

I have removed the neutrality tag from the Madonna article. The main problem was the intro, and though it still not 100%, it can be worked with.

I see that you plan to work on Whitney Houston, Celine Dion et al. because they need "more reference." Well, I know that "Whitney Houston" needs a lot of work. It's a very bad article, and I have to keep reverting the fancruft that people keep inserting into it. However, "Mariah Carey" is excessively referenced (nearly 100 end notes, including a reference section) and needs no more work. Also, while you were away, I worked on the "Celine Dion" article and added nearly 50 more references, 90% of which were print sources.

If you still request additional referencing, please go through the article and use the citationneeded tag (upon which I will review them to see if end notes/citations are really needed).

As a side note, I apologize if I seemed vindictive on the Madonna talk page. I still believe that the article about the "list of best selling artist" should be deleted, but bringing it up on the Madonna page was unnecessary. Oran e  (talk)  04:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Goodbye
I decided that wikiedia is no longer worth the effort. Maggott2000 20:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Abba number ones cvr.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Abba number ones cvr.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Abba number ones cvr.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Abba number ones cvr.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Best of abba.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Best of abba.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of List of best-selling singles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of best-selling singles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of best-selling singles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Chase (talk / contribs) 23:08, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)