User talk:Magic101hi

Extra gum
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Extra gum, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wrigley.com/wrigley/products/products_extra.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:33, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Extra gum
A tag has been placed on Extra gum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Raven1977 (talk) 22:37, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Copyrights
Hey there, I noticed your edit here to the article Chewing gum. While your contribution is welcome, I noticed that parts of it seemed to be copied from other sites (such as here and here). While improving Wikipedia with information from other sources is a good thing (and essential to our policy of verifiability), copying content directly from other sources (without permission from the owners of that content) is not recommended, as it may violate copyright law (see WP:COPYRIGHT for Wikipedia's policies and guidelines in that regard). I also notice copies of parts of some other Wikipedia articles. While this is allowed, it's not necessarily a good idea; having the detailed information in one place (the article for the particular brand of gum), with a summary and a link from other places, is probably a better idea. So I've removed your edit to Chewing gum to give you a chance to fix these problems with it before putting it in again. -- Why Not A Duck 22:55, 15 December 2008 (UTC)