User talk:MagicSkyPimp

1
1

November 2016
Hello, I'm FoCuSandLeArN. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Amatulic with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  20:48, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Since when is using the F-word uncivil? Is calling someone a retard uncivil too? because there are actual retards in the world, I would provide a source for that but it's not worth my time. - John Dane Benelli (talk) 20:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
 * For the record, name calling is considered incivil here, but it didn't bother me. FoCuSandLeArN, you could have left it up to me what to do with that comment.
 * And "John", you really need to get your original account unblocked. Misguided as it may seem, we delete contributions from block evaders as a matter of policy. If you would invest a bit of effort in getting your original account unblocked, you could continue doing good work here without losing it. Just pointing out positive contributions you've made with your sockpuppet accounts would count for something, demonstrating your commitment to the Wikipedia project. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:44, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Flooded with them hundreds unblocked following successful appeal
Following a successful appeal via email to the arbitration committee, Flooded with them hundreds has been unblocked, with an indefinite one-account restriction and the agreement to publicly disclose all past accounts. The account restriction has been logged at Editing restrictions. The past accounts are:



For the Arbitration Committee, GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard