User talk:Magicmondays

Speedy deletion nomination of Christine Hogarth


A tag has been placed on Christine Hogarth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Boleyn (talk) 20:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

info for the Hogarth article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Christine_Hogarth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Megalibrarygirl contact Rosiestep or Megalibrarygirl

A belated welcome and note
Hi Magicmondays: I see you got a welcome with an invitation to the Teahouse, which is indeed a good place for new editors to ask questions, with a lot of friendly people who are good at explaining our sometimes arcane rules and conventions, including the editing syntax. But nobody gave you a full "welcome" template with links so you can look up the rules and guidelines. Here's one, a bit late, and you're very welcome here.

Regarding Christine Hogarth, I declined the speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Christine Hogarth and have done some work on it, including re-ordering it and creating sections, identifying the sources, and (re)adding her campaign page as an external link (I can't see the deleted versions of the article). That was the only place I could find anything about her education, although I found a radio interview with her that may add more about her; I can't use that because I don't have sound. The article is pretty slim as a biography. One of her positions is unsourced, and there's little indication of when she did what, and where did she grow up and where did she earn her degree? Do you know of any published third-party sources for that information, including the radio interview? The relevant notability guideline determining whether she merits an article is here: notice that criteria 2 and 3, the applicable ones, both require substantial coverage of her as an individual. As an encyclopedia, we have to be strict about not allowing Wikipedia to be used as an advertising platform; see here and in fact that whole page. That means in practice that there is a far higher chance of an article on a political candidate being judged acceptable if it contains information about the person's life, rather than only summarizing their résumé; this, plus the way the article was structured close to sources that are about her candidacy, is triggering the judgement by some editors that the article is promotional in intent. I am not Megalibrarygirl or Rosiestep, but I hope my work on the draft and this explanation will be helpful. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Christine Hogarth
Draft:Christine Hogarth, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Christine Hogarth and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Christine Hogarth during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  DGG ( talk ) 20:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:26, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Is this supposed to be ironic? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:12, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Christine Hogarth concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Christine Hogarth, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 17 May 2018 (UTC)