User talk:MagisterLudi1963

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

This is not factually accurate. See User talk:Ordenrecords. The blocking admin noted two problems with your account. You were not invited to create a new account, at least not on that talk page, not as far as I can see. --Yamla (talk) 14:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Ordenrecords is renaming to this account.
See unblock decline above. Issues remain. Dloh cier ekim   (talk) 18:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)


 * I just took a look at Pink Turns Blue, one of the articles it looks like you wrote. Although it was informative, it was full of original research and unsourced claims.  Writing encyclopedia articles is not easy; you need to substantiate your claims with citations to reliable sources and avoid adding your own personal analysis.  For example, if you want to say that a band drifted from post-punk to dance music, you have to cite a music journalist who explicitly says this.  You can't perform the analysis yourself – even if you are a music journalist.  This is because we can only summarize what published articles say.  However, if you do publish an article that says this, it becomes possible for Wikipedia to cite that article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:02, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

@ NinjaRobotPirate: Hello NRP, thank you for your guidance. I will try to make my articles more specific and related to the sources. I tried to add the sources I used at the bottom but these were deleted afterwards, probably because I did not correctly describe why I added or changed them (some references to sources were dead links). I am very keen to learn and improve my contributions to reach Wikipedia standard ASAP. As a principle I am concentrating on major releases (album) and oustanding achievements (chart positions, headliner at international festivals and awards) or major changes in personnel or style. Sources for change in style often are critiques in major publications.