User talk:Magnetic Rag

Orphaned non-free image (File:Padron.gif)
You've uploaded File:Padron.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 00:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

GA for Magnetic Rag
I'll be reviewing your namesake article. Binksternet (talk) 08:37, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Please provide references for the 'B' section and the 'Coda' section. These paragraphs have no reference. Binksternet (talk) 11:00, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Additionally, the 'popularity' statement in the lead isn't yet supported by a reference. Binksternet (talk) 06:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to review the article. You've already made many great observations and improvements. Magnetic Rag (talk) 19:08, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron

 * This is the corrected template. Sorry for the confusion, you are the second editor to ask that. It doesn't matter what you are, anyone can join, one look at my user page, you can see that i am a strong inclusionist. Ikip (talk) 17:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to ARS!
{| style="border: 4px solid #CC0000; padding: 6px; width: 80%; min-width: 700px; background: #FFFAF0; line-height: 20px; cellpading=30" align=center Hi,, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
 * colspan="2" |

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
Content


 * News items and announcements
 * Contest


 * Featured editor: Teeninvestor
 * Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers


 * Want ads
 * Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques

Rescue
Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:29, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

The Wagner article is in need of some help
We're in a bit of a pickle in the Wagner discussion page. The issues concerns Social class (sociology) and the phrase supposedly common Germanic past and has now been dismissed by some editors as inconsequential. Furthermore, the name Other interpretations in the article dismisses the general review and broader Wagner analysis to a subcategory under Controversies (mainly the topic of anti-Semitism). Please help. Just take fast look and maybe help in the balancing act. Thank you


 * In his own era he furthermore provided the newly emerged middle class with a medium to transfer its familial and political conflicts into a myth of supposedly common Germanic past.
 * (In the introduction, removed as non consequential)
 * User:Major Torp (talk) 17:23, 7 November 2011 (UTC)