User talk:Magouli4

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parviscopa has been accepted
 Parviscopa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Theroadislong (talk) 09:48, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Parviscopa help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Welcome!
Hello, Magouli4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 02:15, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Mezenia) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Mezenia, Magouli4!

Wikipedia editor Nikolaiho just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"I would consider merging some headings (description, diversity, discovery) to avoid too many headings."

To reply, leave a comment on Nikolaiho's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

 Nik ol ai ho ☎️📖 03:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Ramellina) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Ramellina, Magouli4!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Rather than include Mikhail Fedonkin in a See also section, he should be linked within the article. See WP:SEEALSO for guidelines: 'See also' sections are by no means required, and should generally not duplicate links already in the article, or those that should be. --Animalparty! (talk) 22:49, 31 December 2017 (UTC)"

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Studenicia
Hello, Katherine!

You started creating articles about Ediacaran fossils. It's good, but you have to be careful, attentive and good understand the subject. The majority Ediacaran taxa described before 1997 are questionable (first of all, it is numerous discoidal fossils). Many were described without an correct understanding of their nature, taphonomy, ecology, and are represented by single poorly preserved specimen. At present many taxa have been rejected or synonymized with other taxa or forgotten, ignored until the appearance of new informative specimens someday.

For example, remarks to the Studenecia article:

Correct name. Yuri Gureev named this fossil Studenicia galeiforma gen. et sp. nov. (link to download Gureev, 1983). Studenecia is incorrect spelling. This incorrect form appeared in one word together with numerous correct forms in the Menasova Angelina PhD dissertation 2006. Unfortunately I was duplicating this misprint in the List of Ediacaran genera, and it spread on the web. I was inattentive.

 It is Bergaueria major Palij, 1976, a sea anemone trace fossil (vertical burrow) from Early Cambrian of the Ukraine. Not Studenicia.

Locality. Dniester river, near Studenitsa village, Podolia, Ukraine. Not from Romania.

Taxonomic status. Gureev described Studenicia galeiforma in article 1983 and interpretated it as body fossil of a primitive cnidaria. However, already in 1984 he refused his earlier version and reinterpretated this fossil as trace fossil Monocraterion isp. (see Ivantsov et al., 2015 "Upper Vendian macrofossils...", page 105, 111). Since then, no new material and research has appeared. In the S. Jensen critical review (2008) Ediacaran trace fossil record it is noted that the published information does not allow for a critical evaluation nature of this fossil.

Besr regards, Aleksey (Alnagov (talk) 20:47, 1 January 2018 (UTC))

Error taxobox colour
Hi, please don't leave articles with the error taxobox colour – red boxes – as at [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Namalia&oldid=818023292]. Normally, a manually constructed taxobox would have a phylum present which sets the colour. In the case of Ediacaran fossils, where it's not clear whether they were animals or plants, you need to add incertae sedis (or color_as if you prefer) to make the taxobox assume the incertae sedis colour. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:44, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Studenecia.png
Thanks for uploading File:Studenecia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mezenia.png
Thank you for uploading File:Mezenia.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:05, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Namalia.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Namalia.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Orthogonium.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Orthogonium.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:
 * File:Palaeoplatoda.png
 * File:Pambikalbae hasenohrae.jpeg

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Parviscopa Liu et al 2015.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Parviscopa Liu et al 2015.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 22 August 2018 (UTC)