User talk:Magpiemen

I know you love your Pies, so check out Category:Collingwood Football Club.  R o  gerthat  Talk  10:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  R o  gerthat  Talk  10:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

A tag has been placed on Bigfooty.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MER-C 11:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

G'day
You seem to be making some decent edits. But it also appears you are making some vandalism, such as the crap atBooragoon, Western Australia. It would be nice if you would bring an end to the vandalism, and focus on making yourself useful. That way you'll have a very good future here. Hesperian 04:34, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

May 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, Edward Ting, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Curran (talk)  02:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Please Stop
Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. The-Pope 04:28, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. The-Pope 11:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Indefinite Block
It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely. --Seattle Skier (talk) 05:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Reply to your email
This account was indefinitely blocked because all recent edits were vandalism, including a pattern of repeatedly modifying other editors' posts (especially legitimate warning messages) on your talk page here. Such conduct is unacceptable and a violation of policy (see Vandalism). You claim in your email that "The user talk page was edited, by myself, because of retaliation against other users posting uncomplimentary comments about me", but that is only partly true and overlooks the numerous modifications of legitimate warning messages you have done. It is clear that you think you're being very funny, but other editors are not amused by your modifying their comments. I expect you not to modify my comments here in any way.

You have made a few constructive edits in the past, but it appeared to be the case that your constructive contributions had ended some time ago. Since March 20, almost all of your edits were either non-constructive or outright vandalism.

Your other account User:Tarkyn 24 was blocked because it was suspected to be a sockpuppet, suspicions which you have confirmed to be true. Using and abusing multiple accounts to circumvent blocks is not acceptable, please read the policy at Sock puppetry.

I am not inclined to unblock this account or User:Tarkyn 24. You will have to ask another admin to do so, by placing the template below, and another admin should stop by shortly to review your case. They will review my actions, and may choose to maintain the indefinite block, reduce its length, or perhaps unblock immediately. --Seattle Skier (talk) 16:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Reply
As mentioned above, I was intending to use the secondary account to make edits that followed wikipedia's guidelines on the pages outlined in the email. The edits on a few pages were opinionated, and a few edits, that I have noted have now been deleted, were viable.

I would prefer other messages sent to me to be sent to Tarkyn 24's user page, and I request this account is deleted.Magpiemen 21:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * There is no way to "delete' any Wikipedia accounts, so this account will always remain here. If you wish to use the account at User:Tarkyn 24, please post the following text at the bottom of User talk:Tarkyn 24:  , and replace the words "your reason here" with an explanation of why that account should be unblocked.  Another admin will then visit the page and may unblock you.  I would prefer to not to unblock you myself, because involving another admin serves as a check and review of my actions, and that's a good thing.


 * By the way, thanks for cleaning up the warning messages above which you had previously edited. --Seattle Skier (talk) 00:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Supercoach
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Supercoach, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Supercoach. Jfire (talk) 01:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)