User talk:Magus05/Archive

This is an archive of my past talk entries. Please do not add to or edit this page. If you need to leave me a message you can do so here.

Video game launches
I've replied to your post on my talk page by taking the matter to Village_pump_%28policy%29. Please contribute to the discussion there.-gadfium 00:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

After Midnight Project
The page was deleted after the discussion on this page. Note that as the closer I did not evaluate the original article, only the discussion. You can recreate it, but it is a good idea to show sources that display how the subject passes Notability (music) or there's a good chance it will get deleted again.  Citi Cat   ♫ 23:00, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV
Thank you for making a report on Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. -- RG2 01:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

need your help!
Magus05, I need your help in monitoring the Genocides In History page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history to prevent "the lunatics taking over the asylum"! Can I count on you? Cheers in advance, - Ledenierhomme 07:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Sathiala
I notice that you've nominated the article at Sathiala for deletion. While I agree that the article is probably worthy of deletion, the rationale you posted to argue for that deletion was "...", which doesn't exactly sum up the problems with the article. As the nom, you need to give reasons for deleting the article, so that a debate can take place. If no rationale is provided, the nomination could be closed, and you or someone else might need to re-nominate. Might I suggest WP:RS and WP:V as good starts for a rationale? Thanks, ZZ Claims~ Evidence 05:15, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Portal
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Fedallah (talk) 03:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

To be honest, I don't much care either way at this point. There are more important things to fight over. Fedallah (talk) 04:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)