User talk:Magyar25

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Magyar25. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Aristophanes 68  (talk)  21:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Stirling's approximation
Hi Magyar25,

A quick observation: your edits to Stirling's approximation are clear improvements, thanks. However, they are substantive rewrites or reorganizations, not trivial things (such as typo fixes), so it would be better if you did not mark them as "minor".

All the best, JBL (talk) 11:50, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Valuation (algebra)
Most of your recent edits to Valuation (algebra) appear to be improvements. However, per MOS:SEEALSO the "See also" section of an article is a bulleted list of internal links to related Wikipedia articles and should not repeat links that appear in the article's body or its navigation boxes. Please do not reinsert links that duplicate those in the article body.—Anita5192 (talk) 02:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Lamest Edit Wars
I think you've got the wrong end of the stick. While "tightening phrasing" on a general article is a good idea (because it allows the reader to understand the topic faster), that doesn't really apply to humorous essays, where being more verbose can be funnier. For example, over on WikiSpeak, we don't say "The odds of passing a second RfA after desysopping are low", but instead go completely over the top and say "The odds of passing a second RfA after desyopping are about as likely as a full frontal nude picture of Jimmy Savile being well-received at the Great Ormond Street Hospital". I seem to recall reading once that one easy way to be funny is to be specific and verbose when you don't need to. Or, just hang out on 's talk page, if you can get to the bottom of it before the end of the year, that is. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  23:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * There is no royal road to funny. EEng 08:03, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tiger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Specific name ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tiger check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tiger?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pope Paul III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles V ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Pope_Paul_III check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Pope_Paul_III?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Wikipedia:Five pillars, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Izno (talk) 01:30, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
 * This was a gentle warning, but I will give you a stronger one: you will be blocked from editing if you vandalize a project page again. ~Swarm~  {sting} 02:38, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

polar vortex
Hi. I reverted your change to global warming's lead. Please consider attempting an addition in the section on oceans at Effects of global warming. But also please find some reliable sources better than self-published blogs. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 13:41, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indo ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Oak check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Oak?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Galois theory
I have reverted your post in Talk:Galois theory per WP:TPO, because it is interleaved with my post. This changes the global meaning of my post, and makes difficult for third parties to understand who wrote what.

For responding to your post, I'll wait a version that complies with MOS:TALK. D.Lazard (talk) 15:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Hayflick limit
Hello Magyar25! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Hayflick limit, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236227809_Three_layer_functional_model_and_energy_exchange_concept_of_aging_process, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
 * Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Hayflick limit and send an email with confirmation of permission to "[mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org ]". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Hayflick limit, in their email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org ] or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Hayflick limit. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Hayflick limit with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

See Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Hayflick limit saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Boud (talk) 19:58, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)