User talk:Magzel123

Speedy deletion nomination of Journal of Hearing Science


A tag has been placed on Journal of Hearing Science, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Crusio (talk) 12:54, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Journal of Hearing Science


A tag has been placed on Journal of Hearing Science, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Crusio (talk) 09:46, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Journal of Hearing Science, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Crusio (talk) 09:53, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Please note that it is highly inappropriate to re-create an article that was deleted after an AfD, repeatedly doing this may get you blocked from editing WP. In addition, it may result in the article being "salted", making re-creation at some future point in time (when this journal perhaps has become notable), much more difficult. --Crusio (talk) 09:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello

I deleted that Journal of Hearing Science article yet again. I suggest that you make a draft instead at User:Magzel123/Journal of Hearing Science, and produce a page that includes references that indicate what other independent people have said about it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)