User talk:Mahan khomamipor

Welcome!
Hello, Mahan khomamipor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JBH (talk) 00:53, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Mutiny of colours has been reverted. Your edit here to Mutiny of colours was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://rosewatersaffron.wordpress.com/tag/zeinab-tabrizy/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:23, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Mutiny of colours
Hi there. I see you are having a bit of trouble on Mutiny of colours. The important thing is to remember that the changes I am making, and that other people are probably going to make in future, are trying to help so please try to work with us and avoid putting things back as they were.

For example, not having header markup for the title of the article is standard Wikipedia style. If you look at other articles you will see that they all do it that way. In fact, I think it would be a good idea for you to find an existing good article about a similar subject and look at how that is done. It will help you see how we want the structure and style to be.

Also, it is clear that English is not your first language and the grammar of what you initially contributed was not perfect. That is OK. It was good enough that I could understand it and fix it. Please take care to not overwrite the improved grammar with the old grammar. You can still make changes but please add them to the new text without restoring the old version. This way people can gradually make the article better and better without going backwards.

I know the tags I added do not look very nice but they are only temporary. They tell people about what needs to be improved. They can be removed once we have categories, inline citations and the article is linked from others. See if you can address these issues before removing the tags.

I have added WikiProject Art to the talk page of the article. I hope that will attract other people who can help. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:13, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

I have now found a category to add: Category:Documentary films about graffiti so the "Uncategorised" tag is now gone. It would be good to get one or two more categories on it but this fulfils the basic requirement.

I think the next important thing to do is to add inline citations (using the "ref" tag) and to improve the referencing to use more reliable sources. That is necessary to make the article is completely safe from being deleted. The sources you have so far are connected to the people making the film. We can still use those but we need independent, reliable sources as well. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:22, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Mahan khomamipor, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi there - just a heads up that I have moved your recent question at the Teahouse from the bottom of the page to the top. Most talk pages require that new discussions be placed at the bottom of the page. At the Teahouse, however, new questions are placed at the top to maximize visibility. Thanks! ~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 22:24, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Paliz Khoshdel


The article Paliz Khoshdel has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non notable filmmaker who might also fall under too soon.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 16:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mutiny of Colours for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mutiny of Colours is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mutiny of Colours until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 16:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Mahan khomamipor. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Paliz Khoshdel, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 16:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Mahan khomamipor. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mutiny of Colours, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 16:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Mutiny of Colours. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 14:58, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mutiny of colours


A tag has been placed on Mutiny of colours, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DThomsen8 (talk) 15:14, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Recreating deleted articles
I've deleted the article for Mutiny of colours because ultimately I couldn't find anything to show that the new information would overturn the prior AfD. The sources on the articles had some issues with verifiability and the only truly good source I could find was a source in a German paper. I'm sorry, but right now I just can't see where the film would pass NFILM as a whole. You can try building up a version at WP:AfC and slowly trying to collect sources, but this is likely going to be something that will take a few years to really show notability since the film is still in the process of being made. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:58, 12 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Mahan,
 * I think I can suggest a way forwards for you on Wikipedia.
 * I'd like to point out that, while Mutiny of colours might not be notable as a film, it is still possible to write about street art in Iran on Wikipedia, so long as you adhere to our neutral point of view, reference it properly and don't overdo it. Maybe you can consider adding a short paragraph with reliable references about the scene in Iran, and the difficulties it faces, to the Street Art article. There is already a section for Asia. You don't want to add too much as this section needs to cover all of Asia without too much about any one country. (Note: Mutiny of colours is not itself a reliable source but maybe some of the sources it draws from could be, or maybe you can find alternative sources that are.)
 * Please take care with this. Remember you are not here to promote the film or its makers but you can write about the same subject as the film covers.
 * --DanielRigal (talk) 11:16, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mutiny of colours


Hello, Mahan khomamipor. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Mutiny of colours".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:40, 30 August 2015 (UTC)