User talk:Mahaprabhu

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:JSPS.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:The+one+logo+3.png. The copy called Image:The+one+logo+3.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 18:30, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JSPS.png
Thanks for uploading Image:JSPS.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Psychosocial studies network
A tag has been placed on Psychosocial studies network requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DGG (talk) 07:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jada Pearl


A tag has been placed on Jada Pearl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Hairhorn (talk) 18:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Harry Singh
Hello, Mahaprabhu. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Harry Singh, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Harry Singh to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Meatsgains (talk) 02:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Harry Singh
Hi, I am looking to get into touch with Harry Singh, can you help me out? Thanks, Cam (talk) 10:33, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Yes I can help you out. What contact details do you need from Harry? Also, how many more references do I need to add? Thanks, Mahaprabhu (talk) 17:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Journal of Social & Psychological Sciences


The article Journal of Social & Psychological Sciences has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of notability at all: fails WP:NJOURNALS, for one, due to lack of impact factor and indexing in remotely selective databases. Moreover, aside a few brief mentions in not-that-reliable sources that are all apparently misspelled references to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, there is no evidence of reliable source coverage that would allow this journal to meet WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Every morning  (there's a halo...)  02:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Journal of Social & Psychological Sciences for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Journal of Social & Psychological Sciences is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Journal of Social & Psychological Sciences until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 09:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Harry Singh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harry Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Harry Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:34, 6 February 2019 (UTC)