User talk:MahdDogg

Welcome!

Hello, MahdDogg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Beeblebrox (talk) 19:17, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Introduction to contentious topics
Just letting you know about these.

In addition, please read WP:CIVIL and refrain from making personal attacks as you've done at Talk:Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull. TheTranarchist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 18:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I suppose calling me a hateful bigot is okay though? I pointed out your vandalism and defamtory edits on living people's pages, that your "evidence" presented aren't reports but opinion pieces from biased sources. You have a clear axe to grind, and a deep and burning hatred that is very evident in your manipulation of wikipedia. MahdDogg (talk) 18:33, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to LGB Alliance, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 18:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)


 * No, I didn't. I correctly removed a section that implies guilt by association based upon the address of the charitable organisation, and provided actual direct links to relevant materials that for some reason you decided doesn't count. Wikipedia is fast becoming a source of misinformation driven by ideology and not a place where truth lives. MahdDogg (talk) 18:24, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:41, 19 November 2023 (UTC)


 * What evidence do you have to back up this assertion? I'm making edits to improve the accuracy of the encyclopedia, yet your own admin staff are guilty of vandalism. This block is an intimidation act based on collusion between admins to push false information on this platform. MahdDogg (talk) 00:02, 29 December 2023 (UTC)