User talk:Mahelaej

Copyright problems with S21: The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine (S21, la machine de mort Khmere Rouge) (2002)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, S21: The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine (S21, la machine de mort Khmere Rouge) (2002), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.answers.com/topic/s21-the-khmer-rouge-killing-machine. As a copyright violation, S21: The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine (S21, la machine de mort Khmere Rouge) (2002) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. S21: The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine (S21, la machine de mort Khmere Rouge) (2002) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:S21: The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine (S21, la machine de mort Khmere Rouge) (2002) and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:S21: The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine (S21, la machine de mort Khmere Rouge) (2002) with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:S21: The Khmer Rouge Killing Machine (S21, la machine de mort Khmere Rouge) (2002).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Millermk90 (talk) 04:41, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome!

 * }

June 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kaala (2018 film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Diffs: "Highly anticipated" seems to contradict other sources like this, which note low advance bookings. The unjustified content just comes across as promotional anyway, as fans would naturally anticipate something they assumed they'd like. Additionally, "mixed to positive", "mixed to negative" phrasing is widely detested across multiple WikiProjects, as it is meaningless. "Mixed" already means "positive and negative", so "mixed to positive" would mean "positive and negative to positive". It's absurd. Further, we don't cherrypick reviews and then attempt to summarise those selections as representative of the entirety of critical response. That's selection bias. Any summary of critical response must be directly attributed to a specific reliable source, and if there are differences of opinion (and I'm sure there will be for this film) then we present both significant viewpoints.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:09, 9 June 2018 (UTC)