User talk:Mahendra Niraula

Help!Help!
Hi,My id #5894790 has because enly blocked by someone multiple times and has given me headaches a lot.I wanna request to any admistrator to help me with unblocking my id speedily so that I could help Wikipedia with tireless efforts .Mahendra Niraula (talk) 06:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

autoblocked because my IP address was currently used by ''Nepali 2053." The reason given for Nepali2053's block is : "abusing multiple accounts". | 3 =Bbb23|3 = 5894790

Recent edits to International English Language Testing System
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edits because I believe the article was better before you made that change. The addition was not written clearly, and the commentary part needs a citation to show where it has been published. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! [[User:Noyste thank you for this tiny improving suggest, but I didn't provide the citation for the edit of this articles because I just had added few other tests including ielts, GMAT, GRE & SAT but I have not detaily descrided about them therefore that's OK you meant it was better before I made it edit but I amnew guy for eEnglish Wikipedia therefore I may be wrong on typing English properly as I am not native holder of English language anyway I admit you once more for suggesting & I get edit ways from other people like you.But I don't think I am about to go wrong for this articles because I derived the article from one of the ielts book.
 * OK Mahendra, you say you got your information from some book, but what I'm trying to tell you is that you need to give us details of that publication by including a reference. The way to do this is set out on this page. References will be needed for any information you add to any article. If you don't give references, well unfortunately your edits will continue to be reverted. I see you changed something on Abu Dhabi Mall and, I'm sure by mistake, you removed the "See also" section heading. To edit Wikipedia you need a good standard of English - better than what you have shown us so far - and an understanding of Wiki markup, on which perhaps this online tutorial will help you Noyster  (talk),  19:30, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Stomach has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stomach was changed by Mahendra Niraula (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916756 on 2015-01-07T09:57:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello, cluebot I'm not so sorry for being reverted my mistakes here but I want to know how can the editing be correct ?well, writings are free to make but nonsense editings are being reverted & deleted very soon. OK, no problem, but I feel hesitated to make correct having fear of being reverted frequently." Mahendra niraula.
 * Unfortunately your edit to Pathibhara has also had to be reverted. It was a long passage which may belong in a local guide for tourists, but not here. I'm really sorry and I'm sure you want to improve Wikipedia, and we normally try our best to encourage new editors and help them. But in your case I have to suggest that you do not make any further edits at the present time on English Wikipedia. We've had discussions before, and I don't see any change. There are two problems: the standard of English, and the fact that your edits so far have simply not been what readers would expect to find in a well-respected encyclopedia. I cannot imagine that any further edits from you would be accepted soon. With best wishes Noyster  (talk),  20:14, 7 January 2015 (UTC)"Hi, Noyster good morning! OK i'm fed up with articles editing from today, because I don't haveany standard eEnglish language & on the next hand I think I don't have ways to make article editings & you have denoted me that my editing would not be accepted soon.yea we had discussed before about the case of editing but you insisted to make improve on English Wikipedia OK I do that myself but I imagine that practice makes anyone perfect & have to go regularly. But you have made me upset here with sentence that no further editing would be good for me to English Wikipedia" OK bye bye oyster but no other people have warned me like this but you have done. I feel very tasteless in this case. I am so much interested to contribute for Wikipedia but my access to this has been made effortless by people.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Headache. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. pcfan500 (talk) 07:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)/" I am sorry, I had just tried my best to practice but it is found as vandalism its OK.

A kitten for you!
bae

Sedgcdhcfolx (talk) 02:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC) OK, but why did you post this puppy? I am stunned to see this one.

January 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Terhathum District has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Terhathum District was changed by Mahendra Niraula (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965801 on 2015-01-26T18:14:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:14, 26 January 2015 (UTC)Hi, clue bot ! I am extremely sorry as you badly removed my article " Terathum district"  I don't see any reason why you removed this one. I don't agree  being removed without any factual reason but I hope this edit is quite constructive for me if it is not fitted for you  & please review it once more don't delay & make it saved  "Mahendra"

Can you add images?
Hi, I appreciate your recent edits on En Wikipedia. It would be great if you illustrate the article Myanglung with relevant images?--Ganesh Paudel (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Yea, Why not?
Hi, ganesh sir welcome you for your appreciation, well, I am doing my best to make more attractive & substantial changes about Myanglung but, I tried doing upload the image too, but couldn't upload, let's see I get it upload.But, a bitter matter is that recently a editer named The banner has reverted Myanglung Therefore, let's try suggesting him to put the edit as the same.Mahendra Niraula, 1:05 UTC ,on 25, Feb,2015.

Why your writing deleted?
Dear Mahendra Ji, I'm sorry to see that the major portion of your writing has been deleted by another user. We can reduce the chance of revert by citing the sources for the writing. I'll write on the article's talk page. We can regain some uncontroversial portion of the writing from your previous version. Better, why don't you practice in Nepali Wikipedia?--Ganesh Paudel (talk) 08:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

I have no idea why it was deleted!!
Hi, Ganesh g, iam so shocked while being deleted my constructive article & feel so detered to rewrite it again.You see, I took long time to fully edit about Myanglung & I think it was not still completion, but just this morning a editor called the bannersuddenly, deleted my edit. I am repanting or regretting & I hope, that guy may bring it back as ditto or as the same.I am researching about it by myself here by walking & asking to the concerned person but on the scanty way, it was made fly.Ganesh sir, I am so much interested to contribute for Wikipedia, but iam using just mobile set to write that's why,i cant type in nepalese font, however I am doing well. Yea, I write here for Ne Wikipedia since today, so, what method I will have to use to write in nepali Wikipedia?, I would be glad, if you guide me for this.Also, I am not used to be perfect to use wiki marks eventhough, I am trying my best. I think,this editor deleted the article just showing silly way & not yet the reasons has sent me why it was deleted. Mahendra Niraula 11: 25 pm( UTC),25, Feb 2015.

Don't get discouraged if your edit is deleted
Hi Mahendra Jee, please don't get discouraged when your edits are deleted. It is quite normal to delete some portion or revert all in any Wikipedia. Any user can do this as like as any user can write new article and edit another article written by other. Basically if the writing is not compatible to the Wiki's basic guidelines or if you have not cite any source for the information you write, articles are edited. I suggest you to write short but precise way and give citation to the information. You can see any other article to learn how to cite a book or magazine or website. Happy editing!--Ganesh Paudel (talk) 05:55, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Not got already discouraged but am afraid
Hello, Ganesh jee, I am not already discouraged while being deleted just a article & also won't be simply so deterred but what I feel that the articles be saved & checked properly before deleting them.Article are written with hard labour, I think it should not be referred you, as you are veteran or long experienced guy.Ganesh sir, by the way the article written was possibly endowed with as much as sources & citations, I don't have to boast saying that it was perfect & also it had some unneeded descriptons to some extend. But the worst habit of editor who tries to view the article is to delete all portions prior to check well & warn to editor.As I am quite new writer., I have no good idea how to write & how the articles are accepted to be saved. I tried writing on my user page, & tried by searching the article if it comes but it didn't. Mahendra Niraula, 3:15( UTC) 26, Feb, 2015

Nepali typing in mobile
As far as typing in Nepali concerned, if you use smart phone, you can download Nepali input programs like hamro keyboard for android. If you use feature phone, your phone might already have the input method.--Ganesh Paudel (talk) 05:55, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Have just collors set

 * Can I have access to make input or enter the nepali typing font even in this set? But no keyboard is available basically nepali. Mahendra Niraula 3:30, 26,Feb, 2015.

Disambiguation link notification for March 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Myanglung
 * added links pointing to Medium, Co, Global, SBI, Limited, Narayani and Operative

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Improved notification, March 5, 2015
Hi, Thank you for your constructive ideas & advices which inspires me more to go ahead by making improved my style of writing so far. Well, I would be glad having such a advices from you but I don't like being reverted at once the article I wrote by editor before asking permission.OK my friend I have amended about Myanglung So far, & hope you find correct .Niraula Mahendra (5:pm, 5march,2015)

Myanglung again
You should take care that your text are factual and backed up by sourceI. Phrases as Usually, here in Myanglung there are 5 banks namely and Note: Besides these above banks, there are other additional banks but is known just as co-operative. or Here are two medium schools they are as below. is not the factual style Wikipedia needs. We know this article is about Myanglung. So, no need to say Usually, here in Myanglung there are 5 banks namely as a text like There are five banks: is sufficient.

You also state Myanglung has its own history to be Myanglung i. e. Once upon a time,. That seems to be a line cut off half way. No clue what that means. The Banner talk 14:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Mr Banner
Hi, banner, thank you for your effective suggesting ways. OK, I have amended few words here, may be they became good with grammar & others.Yea, they are factual by sources so far & hope now it must not be reverted by you or else one. Niraula Mahendra ( 5:pm, 5, March 2015)

Too long writing: practice at your sandbox first
Hi Mahendra

your writing is too long and looks subjective. I am trying to rewrite some sections of the article. Please do not write subjectively and do not put uncited information. Better do a lot practice at your Sandbox. I'll try to support you if you can give your mobile no to my email.--Ganesh Paudel (talk) 06:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Mahendra's response to ganesh paudel
Hi, Ganesh sir

I think I am not accustomed guy in writing article especially in English language, although, I am just trying to improve my everything those need for Wikipedia & I think I would soon be habituated for this & go ahead together with wikipedia foundation.And on the subject of rewritung, you are welcomed so far that you may help me on tag to tag or make correction if you see anything wrong occured .Sorry, I can't offer you my mobile # as you didnt give me your id email id & better have Fb id. Niraula Mahendra Niraula 3:30pm,22,falgun, 2071.
 * Hi Mahendra, to give me message write in my talk page. I may not find the message if you write in your talk page. In your writing some affliction with the business of hotels and boarding schools is seen. Such afflictions are to be neutralized while writing. Also avoid your subjective feelings to the topic and be factual. Give citation to your writing. You can [mailto:gpaudel@gmail.com email me] for detail query.

March 2015
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

''You donot need to mention date and time. You just need to mention is 4 ~s. '' -- Ascii002 (talk  · contribs  · guestbook ) 15:48, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
-- Ascii002 (talk  · contribs  · guestbook ) 03:22, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Namaste! It's OK I agreed your invitation & would thank it much but it's OK for now because I keep practicing a lot articles until I become experienced guy. & would be expert then will consider about it in future.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 06:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 8) ==  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarkTraceur was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mahendra Niraula/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Mahendra_Niraula Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MarkTraceur&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Mahendra_Niraula reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarkTraceur (talk) 19:43, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Amazing about it
Hi,Mark traceur with the respect to new article I wrote & submitted for creation was ignored & rejected but it's OK, it was my practical experience so, not so discouraged soon but, I feel that any article is declined at first & later it can be saved if it is found constructive, am i right? Mahendra Niraula (talk) 01:51, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Regarding linking to articles
I noticed that you linked many of articles where they are not necessary. Taking instance on my talk page, you mentioned links to academic, agencies, student and so on which are not to be linked as it is not necessary. Your edits to articles also have the same problem. Hope you will keep this point in your mind and remove the unwanted linkings made to the articles. Cheers!  -- <span style="background-color: #FFFFDD; border: 1px solid #808000; padding: 5px; border-radius: 16px 8px 16px 8px;"><font color="#000">Ascii002 (<font color="#000">talk  · <font color="#000">contribs  · <font color="#000">guestbook ) 09:39, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Regarding related to article
Hello, ascii 002 Shit! What a controvercial discussion is going to occure on such a small errors! It's still in process of being edited so, I don't see any great mistakes linking to this article whatever you have remarked about mistakes I made.No, that's just your own intentional &pretending comments in my thoughts so, I have not referred to students on my article especially onmyanglung.OK, my fellow let's hope it will one day be a perfect article when we both continue amending its structure  & new changes. Happy editing! Mahendra Niraula (talk) 02:01, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

, Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Myanglung
 * added links pointing to TU, Resting, VDC, Place, Limited and Visitors

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Correction notification for march10,2015
Hi, Dlp user, I am happy for what you have informed me of & I think the remarked attributes are not so harmful words for Wikipedia although, they have been avoided from here.I hope now the article might be accepted by wikipedia .It's a matter of happiness marking the mistakes & guiding to recorrect though I have not denoted any rejections to follow the instructions.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 10:03, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

submission at Articles for creation: Alcohol hang over (March 15)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alcohol hang over and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Mahendra_Niraula Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Josve05a&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Mahendra_Niraula reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

<span style="background: turquoise;font-family: 'Segoe Script', 'Comic Sans MS';">(t) Josve05a  (c) 09:20, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Confusion on how to make possible article
This article is about how people become intoxicated by alcohol so, I have provided it with a reference & submitted but couldn't saved at a time so next one is how to make easily accepting article by new editor & want to ask you is the article written in sandbox possibly accepted for new article?Mahendra Niraula (talk) 10:39, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

mbiguation link notification for March 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ishibu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ward. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Myanglung because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 12:01, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Id has been blocked, please help me to unblock
Hi, I am really stunned and surprised when my regularly running ID was appeared as blocked suddenly on22,march 2015.Since iam an inexperienced editors about the policies of unblocking system,and I don't think I am going to be wrong in editing process i wanna ask for help to retrieve my ID soon,If someone could help me with great interest is thanked by heart.Happy editing.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 04:09, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Ishibu
 * added links pointing to Development, Paddy, Secondary and Higher


 * Radio Menchhayem
 * added links pointing to Good and Sympathetic


 * Radio Terathum
 * added links pointing to Technical and Assistant


 * Batase,Terathum
 * added a link pointing to Himalayan


 * Myanglung
 * added a link pointing to ATM


 * Radio singalila
 * added a link pointing to Ilam

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SICKRE PATHIBHARA TEMPLE, Terathum
Hello Mahendra Niraula,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SICKRE PATHIBHARA TEMPLE, Terathum for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 14:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Batase,Terathum
 * added a link pointing to Canabis


 * Phuwatapa Village
 * added a link pointing to Model


 * Radio Menchhayem
 * added a link pointing to FM

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Namrata Yogi


A tag has been placed on Namrata Yogi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Underscorre (talk) 10:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dipika K.C
Hello, Mahendra Niraula. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dipika K.C, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Dipika K.C to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, TheLongTone (talk) 12:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dipika K.C


A tag has been placed on Dipika K.C requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ubiquity (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sworup Raj Acharya


The article Sworup Raj Acharya has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 14:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Namrata Yogi


The article Namrata Yogi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 14:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 14:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mahendra Niraula


A tag has been placed on User:Mahendra Niraula requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 15:30, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion
Hello sir I think that this page ( Mahendra Niraula) should not be speedily deleted because of the following concerns that this user is using his own page not it has been used by anyone else and on the next hand all you have charged me a heavy allegations of writtings,discussions not related to Wikipedia whic makes me feel quite discouraged to give continuations for wikipedia and you have raised a issue of deleting my user page too. It's ok if you found of being totally so then you can do that but why do you charge only me that without caring to other editors as well ? If you see the article i have recently wrote then you can find reliable sources on it and i removed the notifications by mistakes.I am sorry, I am not intending to vandalise to Wikipedia whatever you make me charges.With best regard.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 17:33, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Article writing
I strongly suggest that you read My first article and follow what it says before starting any more new articles. 220  of  Borg 13:29, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * You should know, for example, that page names like SHIKRE PATHIBHARA DEVI,Terathum are not done on WP. Writing in ALL CAPITALS LIKE THIS is considered to be the on-line equivalent of shouting. Please don't do it. 220  of  Borg 13:34, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Never use comments like "He is a fine and gullible person in the eyes of Ishibu's residents." as you did at Ishibu. It is quite a confusing and likely meaningless statement. I'm quite certain that you don't understand what gullible means:
 * "Easily deceived or duped; naïve, easily cheated or fooled."
 * This comment is also un-sourced and you cannot, say things like that when talking about a person on Wikipedia without a Reliable source. This is supposed to be an Encyclopaedia, that comment makes it sound like a gossip magazine. Please read Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP). 220  of  Borg 13:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

In regard to the article of "Ishibu"
Hello, 220 of Borgl In the concerns of article i wrote about  Ishibu what i wanna make you cleared that it is a quite recent article in which i have tried to include the reliable source to make it more trusted and avoid the likelihood of being deleted but by mistake i used a word gulible thinking that if it may give the sense of a credible or believeable person according to my understanding but unluckly it didnt.Sorry for this and another issue you raised here by pointing to References and nomination for deletion'' is not seemed so critical since it has been offered at least a reliable source but you have strongly said that it seems quite pointless how? So far I know I do write article by staying on rule and regulations of  Wikipedia and I never try to infringe them however it happens by mistake so,I intend this be undeleted. With best regard Mahendra Niraula (talk) 05:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * • I have altered the title above so it is obviously it in reply my question. Please make sure to add a link to any page you are discussing. (I've done it for you). I had no idea you had answered here. It is about time you did as you seem to have failed to reply to most messages left for you.
 * • To get another editors attention, try using . Example:.
 * • You should reply every time, as many editors are trying to help you but you seem to ignore their advice, and keep adding un-sourced or unreliable sources and peacock words to pages. If you continue to do this, you may be Blocked from editing.
 * • You seem to have a competence issue. I cannot understand some of what you are trying to say to me above. If you cannot write understandably in English, then you should probably try a editing Wikipedia in your native language. 220  of  Borg 09:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

People do everything with the help of sign languages but as for you ,the language that I use is upsetting and baffling? Wow ! What amazing ideas(matter) you have dear editor! OK,you should not teach (say again) me to do that because I am already an editor even in Nepali Wikipedia but only the reason I have to be an editor in English Wikipedia is that the article which are written in my native language can be read and understood only by those who can understand very well Nepali language and the article written in English language are read by everyone whichever the native language is of them.This is not any abusive argument to you and it is just a exact reply to the question you asked to me.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 05:22, 10 April 2015 (UTC) Substantially edited by Mahendra Niraula later on 10 April
 * No, Mahendra Niraula, the "main problem [we] can't understand [your] style of writing" is that you can write a sentence like "you ignore to me and feel me as if oak no nothing guy so that you are indicating to me such nonsensical blames and mistakes". Even if we allow for the fact that writing in a talk page can be more relaxed than writing in an article, that muddle of words shows that your knowledge of English is just not good enough to be writing for the encyclopedia. What is a tree ("oak") doing here? Just a mistake for "OK"? Didn't you notice it and want to correct it? And that is just one small part of the problem with that sentence. Please concentrate on contributing to Nepali wiki. Pam  D  06:55, 10 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Note to anyone confused by this post: Mahendra changed his wording in the above paragraph after I had quoted from it. He also changed the wording I quote in my post. I have reverted his change to my post, but it now has different wording from his message above. Pam  D  10:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Mahendra Niraula (talk) 10:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Mahendra, what you have written here is not correct. I do not "ignore to me". (If you mean I ignore you?)
 * Again I have trouble understanding what you are saying. Your written English is not good. It is, in my opinion, and also that of other English WP editors, below the standard needed for creating articles on the English WP. You should be able to understand this yourself by now.
 * Example:
 * "... and feel me as oak no nothing guy so that you are indicating to me such nonsensical blames and mistakes"
 * I do not understand, What do you mean by 'oak'? OK? or Okay?
 * "OK,you should not teach me to do that because I am already an editor even in Nepali Wikipedia"
 * Your editing on Nepali WP has nothing to do with English Wikipedia. Your competence to edit here on this Wikipedia in English is seriously in doubt. And your comments here, and elsewhere, are calling into your doubt your attitude to editors who are trying to help you. Saying "... some accusing editor" is not polite, who are you talking about? See also wp:No personal attacks. We are commenting entirely on the standard of your edits, not on you as a person. I suggest you calm down and do that as well. 220  of  Borg 07:36, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nepalese's Fellow Gano


A tag has been placed on Nepalese's Fellow Gano, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanielRigal (talk) 17:37, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Namrata Yogi


The article Namrata Yogi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. DanielRigal (talk) 17:43, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm Wgolf. I noticed that you removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD and I wanted to let you know that I have replaced it. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 17:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, as you did with Sworup Raj Acharya, unless reliable sources have been provided. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 17:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with User:Mahendra Niraula. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Wgolf (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

PLEASE READ THIS: You Are Not Helping
Hello,

I can see that you are trying to help Wikipedia by adding new articles. This is not going well. The problem is that your articles are very hard to understand and your references don't work at all.

Normally we can tidy up an article written by somebody who does not write good English so long as we can understand what they mean. A lot of what you have written does not make sense so we can't tidy it up because we can't understand it.

References need to tell people exactly where to look for the reference material. Your references do not do this. In fact, the links in the reference are not even valid URLs and probably do not take us to the correct website.

If your written English is not good then maybe it is better if you edit the other language Wikipedias instead.

Regards. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:12, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jalapa Devi Primary School,Terathum


The article Jalapa Devi Primary School,Terathum has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is an article about a small primary school. Unlike a secondary/high school it is not automatically considered notable. The article is unreferenced and no good claim to notability is made.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 18:15, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 4 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Xavier Academy Higher Secondary School, Kathamandu page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=654884266 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F654884266%7CXavier Academy Higher Secondary School, Kathamandu%5D%5D Ask for help])

Proposed deletion of Jalapa Devi Primary School,Terathum


The article Jalapa Devi Primary School,Terathum has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A primary school (so not automatically considered notable) with no special claim to notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 11:20, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Jalapa Devi Primary School,Terathum ‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. '' "Since he is regarded as a good and fine person his contributions to the school is found quite praiseworthy or it can be appreciated by all." ''You are kidding aren't you? 1) no source, 2) Totally un-encyclopaedic, which means you don't talk in that sort of praising, flowery language in an encyclopedia. Ever. Unless, it is a direct quote with a reliable source! 220  of '' Borg 08:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jalapa Devi Primary School,Terathum for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jalapa Devi Primary School,Terathum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jalapa Devi Primary School,Terathum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pam D  07:49, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Please take more care
Hallo, when you added a message to User talk:Nirmal Dulal you made a mess of the page and left it like this. Please take more care. New messages should be added at the end of a talk page - the easiest way is to click on the "tab" marked "Add" or "+" at the top of the talk page. I have mended the page which you damaged, but please take care not to make such disruptive edits in future. Pam D  18:21, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Talk pages and competence
You have just added a lengthy message to my user page, User:PamD. Not my talk page, User talk:PamD, but my user page: do you understand that these are different pages? If not, then I am not sure whether you have the competence to edit Wikipedia: I have already this evening had to sort out a complete mess you made of another user's user page when trying to leave a message there.

In reply to your message: You said (on my User Page, from where I have now deleted it):


 * Hello,Good evng sir


 * The article jalapa devi primary school is now being discussed for the proof of addressing whether it is genuine article or not.Well,it's a talk of legitimate and wanted matter as well however I wanted to let you know that I have added at least a citation and a reference to meet the requirement of Wikipedia and it gives you a trustful base to know it is a article fitted for Wikipedia to save .But I know so far that some of your groups including you are trying make deprived from being written and created article for Wikipedia, aren't you? How this article can be fake when there are already provided with citations and references? I hope and wanna say,I am a pure Nepali citizen living in Nepal and I do some helps to Wikipedia for my free time not for jokes and enjoys but just for valuable record of article. With the best regard.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 5:05 pm, Today (UTC+1)

The discussion at Articles for deletion/Jalapa Devi Primary School,Terathum is not discussing "whether it is genuine article or not", or claiming that the article is "fake". It is a discussion as to whether this primary school satisfies the requirement of WP:NOTABILITY enough to make it suitable to have an article in Wikipedia. As a general rule, Secondary schools are considered to be "notable", but primary schools are not unless they have some extrordinary features which can be supported by references in Reliable Sources. This school appears to be a good and worthy primary school, like hundreds of thousands of other schools around the world. There is nothing in the article to suggest that this school should have an article in Wikipedia. No-one is saying the article is fake, just that it is not appropriate for this school to have a Wikipedia article. Please join in the discussion on that "Articles for deletion" page.

You say that you added citations and references to this article, but the one external link and one reference provided do not appear to work: have you checked that you have added them correctly?

I can't understand exactly what you mean by "I know so far that some of your groups including you are trying make deprived from being written and created article for Wikipedia, aren't you?" because your English is so poor, but it appears to be a Personal attack: do not be abusive about other editors. If you cannot understand and write English well enough to participate in English Wikipedia, perhaps you should concentrate your volunteer effort on a Wikipedia in another language where you can participate more usefully. Pam D  22:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm PamD. I noticed that you recently removed some content from User talk:PamD without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''In adding a message to the talk page you removed important characters which left the page displaying an inappropriate "on holiday" message. If you are incapable of editing Wikipedia without causing damage, please stop trying to do so. When you have edited a page, please look carefully at it to see whether the changes are what you intended. If they are not, then please revert your edits. Other editors will become increasingly annoyed by the trail of damage you are leaving.'' Pam  D  07:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)


 * This was the change you made. It showed my "on holiday" and "partial wikibreak" messages, which should not have been displayed. Please note that even small characters like "<--" and "=" are important in Wikipedia, and if you remove them you cause damage. If you continue to cause problems I will report you to WP:ANI with a view to protecting the encyclopedia from your careless editing. Pam  D  07:20, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hyatrung Waterfall, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Pam D  07:47, 8 April 2015 (UTC)


 * A merge was proposed, with a link to "discuss" to show where to discuss the suggestion. You removed the whole merge template. I don't know whether this was ignorance or deliberate disruption, but it was wrong. Do not remove a template like this, but join in a democratic discussion. Your editing is increasingly unhelpful to the project. Please be more careful not to damage the encyclopedia and its procedures. I have replaced the "merge" template: if you want to comment on the suggestion that we should not have two articles for one waterfall, please do so. You might like to suggest which of the two titles is the correct one. But please never remove a merge template in that way. Pam  D  07:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Dates in maintenance tags
Please don't change the date in a tag like "citation needed" which has been applied to an article, as you did here, unless you have made some relevant changes. The date shows when the tag was added, so that people can see "this article has been tagged as needing citations for 5 years" etc. Just leave the dates alone. Pam D  07:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Your comments on my talk page
Please take a lot more care when editing other people's talk pages. You have again created damage to my talk page: look carefully at the changes you made in this edit. You managed to add a space in the middle of my signature. That then broke the link to my talk page. I am getting very weary of your incompetent edits which seem to leave a trail of mess behind for other editors to clean up.

As to what you say, here are some replies:
 * I have shown you the wording which says that we do not include the names of teachers other than head teachers. That means what it says. Please just accept it.


 * I can see nothing to suggest that I have removed citations from Singaha Bahini Higher Secondary School, Myanglung. Perhaps you tried to add citations and the edit was unsuccessful? Please show me what you are complaining about.


 * I was confused about the name of the school because you created an article at the title Singaha Bahini Higher Secondary School,Myanglung (another editor then moved it to include the necessary comma space before "Myanglung"), and then in the article you use the spelling "Singha". You now say "the official registered name is actually (Singha Bahini) not (singaha)", so I will move the page to that name. I have now moved it to Singha Bahini Higher Secondary School - we do not need to disambiguate the namme by adding "Myanglung" because this is the only school of that name Which has an article in English Wikipedia.


 * You say "you have focused to procure the (link) but a Iam confused even on this cases so,what kind of links should be added here please?". This is not very clear but I think my answer to you is: "The note on my talk page asks you to add a link to any article you are discussing on my talk page, because this makes it easier for me, and anyone else looking at the page, to go straight to the page in question rather than having to type its name". I make this request at the top of my user talk page, and you ignore it. It is plain common sense, as a help to anyone reading the talk page. I don't see why this simple request has confused you. Or have I misunderstood your question?

Although you obviously have good intentions in editing Wikipedia I am not sure that you are capable of doing so usefully. Please take much more care in your edits. Are you perhaps using a touch-screen phone which makes it too easy to add or remove characters without noticing? That might explain some of your damaging edits. Please check very carefully that your edits are correct, and avoid adding or subtracting characters at random as you did to my signature on my talk page. I will patch that up now but I hope not to have to spend more time fixing your careless damage. Pam D  07:58, 9 April 2015 (UTC) Small correction made  Pam  D  13:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

My reply to your query as to your talk page
Well, as to your talk Page editing, it seems few mistakes on editing because it happened when I tried to leave you a message and did it saved but since I have a screen-touch mobile the curser goes sometime to the unwanted place from the typing place so, I manage it again to bring in the typing place where I am typing regularly and before that came to this typing place I would have written few texts which remain to the place where curser is leading and as a result the texts I wrote for my message remained on your talk page where your texts are already there. .Therefore, I happened to remove some of your talk page's texts and request you to not get weary in such errors. I am doing to edit more carefully after you informed me to be that even though sometime I forget to preview and I hit directly to the savetab so the mistakes existing on page appear on your talk page but be sure that this all does happen in just the talk page and may rarely happen in article writing..Mahendra Niraula (talk) 10:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

@Next subject about the article (singha bahini higher secondary school) is: you have asked me what I am complaining about is that I had put some citation at the end of the headings and saw them only removed away so I don't know who did that and I accused you of doing that and you didn't accept it and have replied that it has been done by anyone else not you. OK if you have not done that it must be done by anyone else. I try asking to other editor too and if they didn't know then I close this issue .Mahendra Niraula (talk) 10:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

@As to your complaints about more time spending: I am sorry to hear this and I want to ask for apologies for I gave you much head aches and I would like to say that this kind of trouble will not disturb your time any more since now and will be easy in regular routine.And you told me that you have moved "Singha into singaha" which appears correct for the original article only right  now but that I did mistake in the time of creating page and on the article I used different one spelling in a haste and as to the "Singha bahini " the editing process in the heading had already finished out after I added the targeted citations at the end of the heading and it wasn't unsuccessful.Anyway happy editingMahendra Niraula (talk) 10:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Phuwatapa Village, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Pam D  08:47, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * You probably didn't notice, but in this edit you removed a couple of characters: " }} ". Look carefully at the difference to the top of the page before and after your edit. In this version the various maintenance templates all appear in separate boxes and the text " {{multiple issues| " appears at the top. That's because you removed the closing brackets for that template (along with a sensible edit to remove an inappropriate table).

I have mended that page now, but please be more careful. Your repeated careless edits are damaging this international encyclopedia. If you cannot edit better, please stop editing. Pam D  08:51, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

About disruptive editing
Please be sure that I have not edited any of the edits as disruptive edits deliberately because of the following reasons. 1.I do edits mostly using more time to not let to appear any problem but occasionally it appears. 2.While editing the page that I wanted, I take care to the responses come to the page after I edited and if I found the page has negative responses like I found here on your talk page on the behalf of you then I stop editing to the some extent until I became abled to edit again.

Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Xavier Academy Higher Secondary School, Kathamandu
 * added links pointing to Independent, Secondary, Board and Higher


 * Jalapa Devi Primary School,Terathum
 * added links pointing to Himalayan and Principal


 * SHIKRE PATHIBHARA DEVI,Terathum
 * added a link pointing to Bells


 * Singha Devi Middle Secondary School,Terathum
 * added a link pointing to Principal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

You are still editing disruptively
In this edit you changed " ]<sup " to " nameup " in 's signature. You have been asked repeatedly to take more care with your editing. If the combination of you and your phone cannot edit safely then you must stop editing: we should not have to spend so much time clearing up your damage to the encyclopedia. Pam D  13:00, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


 * @ :Please feel sure that it also happened by mistake and I am trying to do more carefully than you asked me to do so but I am still not totally been able to avoid that and am hoping that I will not make more edits as disrupted in future.But I am still unknown about which edits you have asked me that I edited disruptively please show me which.Ususlly i dont blame to my cell phone because it can work whatever we order so,mistakes are somewhat over me but these are not intensionally you see. Also this tell that me how often are you getting my language here so that I could have chances to improve even language writing.Anyway happy editingMahendra Niraula (talk) 16:24, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Even in the edit where you made that reply, you managed to mess up the previous comment: you deleted the characters  "<no  in the first line of my comment, so that what I had written was changed and made nonsense. If you cannot edit safely with your mobile phone, please stop editing.


 * You say "I am still unknown about which edits you have asked me that I edited diruptively please show me which". Perhaps you do not understand how wikipedia editors show each other changes or "diffs" - the "difference" that an edit has made. If you click here you will see the edit of yours which I am talking about in the previous paragraph. It shows clearly the changes you have made, including both the intended change of adding text and the accidental one of removing those few characters. Pam  D  17:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

@ User:PamD,please whatever have happened here in those previous paragraph they all are happenedby accidentally therefore, I wanna ask for apology for what happened and it's a bit uneasy to edit by using mobile phone so that these all are happening repeatedly. As far as I know,you may be understanding my replies with easiness. And I think I am improving my habit of using the systems and editing process as well. Mahendra Niraula (talk) 18:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Do you know that typing "@" on its own doesn't actually do anything in Wikipedia? If you want to "ping" someone, to draw their attention to a message, you need to type which will appear as "@PamD" but will also send me a "notification" to tell me about it.


 * In reply to your messsage: yes, of course I know that all this damage is done by accident, I don't believe that you are trying to harm the encyclopedia. But most editors manage to edit without causing so many problems. If your phone, or your use of it, is such that you cannot avoid making so many mistakes, then there is a serious problem here.


 * And some of the problems you are causing are not because of your mobile phone but appear to be simple carelessness. You have just created Annapurna Secondary English Boarding School, Terathum and also Myanglung Campus, Terhathum. So which is the correct spelling: Terathum or Terhathum? They cannot both be correct - or, rather, Wikipedia needs to establish which one spelling should be used in the encyclopedia. It looks as if Terhathum is the standard spelling in the encyclopedia. Please take care of things like spelling: they are important. In fact neither of these articles needed the place name added as a "disambiguation", so I have moved them both to the simple name of the school.


 * Please take more care: if you think that "situated at the heart if Myanglung of tehrathum district in eastern region development of Nepal" is good English, then you should not be editing this encyclopedia. Try substituting "of" for "if", using a capital T for "Tehrathum" and linking the district name, and using "development region" instead of "region development". Pam  D  22:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

links and references
When you add an external link or a reference with a web address, please check that the link actually works. I see that in creating Xavier Academy Higher Secondary School, Kathamandu you added two references, and gave the URLs (web addresses) as "http://www.kantipur publication. com.np" and "http://www.kantipur weekly newspaper. com.np".. Neither of these is a correct URL (they both contain spaces, which never form part of a URL). Please go back to that article and correct the references so that readers and other editors can actually follow the links. You might also like to fix the first few words of the article: it starts "R ACADEMY HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL" - you have missed out most of the first word, and it should not be in capital letters. Please take more care to check what you type.


 * : By the way,I have done that in accordance with the web address and some of the texts were appearing in form of wrong with the view of managing so,have a look now them once I have mended them but the URL is still not opening easily as I tried to open.But you be confirmed that I have added only the true URL to the article to let it be released as good article. You see that.Mahendra Niraula (talk)`


 * Do you mean that you are just copying the web addresses from somewhere else, rather than actually opening the web page yourself? If you are quoting something as a reference it should be because you have found the information at that web page. If you are giving an External Link it should be because you have seen that the page is an appropriate external link to give. Don't just copy web addresses from elsewhere. Please check every web address you add to Wikipedia: I have found that most, if not all, of the web addresses you add do not open. It may be because there is a temporary problem with the website, or that you have formatted the link badly, or that the web address is completely wrong, or that the website does not even exist. Pam  D  07:22, 10 April 2015 (UTC)


 * : Sorry,you got it wrongly so my actual intention is that I have just formated or set the web pages which were placed by giving spaces and tried checking by clicking but it doesn't open with the descriptions of the article I wrote about.And I created the by having a help of a Nepali Magazine paper and the URL was there so,I made it inserted herewith.But this web is not fake you see.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 07:35, 10 April 2015 (UTC)


 * If you are copying the web addresses from a magazine or newspaper, how do you know that the web address is correct if you can't open it yourself? Please stop adding doubtful web addresses as your sources. Pam  D  07:40, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

I see that Global College of Management, Kathamandu is a mess too: you have mistyped the language template and misspelled Kathmandu as well as adding another "reference" with a broken URL.

Usually if I come across articles with little mistakes like this I fix them up but I am tired of trying to sort things out for an editor who does not seem to be able or willing to check their own work and edit carefully. Pam D  13:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Hmm,you are indeed centralising to me by saying that "Iam tired of trying to sort out the mess of...."but please dont think so because you too were the same in the begining of your editing article for wikipedia.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 07:11, 10 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I have wasted more of my time trying to sort out your Xavier Academy Higher Secondary School (the title needed no disambiguation, so does not need ", Kathmandu" added). You include two references, but neither of these is working for me, even when I format the links correctly: when you create a link to an outside website you do not use "|" between the web address and the text, just a space. Do these two references work when you click on them? They do not do so for me. Pam  D  23:35, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Promised to improve the manner of editing article
Well,in the case of that URL imparting or inserting to the article,the most of the parts were so whatever i have added but i think the main error is i made and that is i have given space which in the url should not be done. It's ok i check to that in the article and see whether it is correct or not.And another is:typing mistake because of the page I created appeared in capital letters and I did it by thinking that the heading should be written in capital letters. So,please help me to correct them too without feeling bore and tired since you are a expert and experienced editor than me.You know whatever you see like "R a word missed that's not the intended letter I type but it existed before "Academy higher secondary school" and this is all by typing mistake not by anything else.

@but I don't think I have made mistake in using language and yea the spelling of kathmandu is in wrong and that's it about mistake you pointed from this article.Please sir don't feel so much tired and I think this is all happening to you because of me,isn't it? But your complaints to me make me feel like i am not even a simple editor, am I?Mahendra Niraula (talk) 16:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shikre Pathibhara Devi


The article Shikre Pathibhara Devi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability - one "reference" is provided, which appears to link to a radio station site (when/if the link works) rather than to any supporting source of information.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pam D  07:53, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Radio Menchhayem


The article Radio Menchhayem has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of existence or notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pam D  08:01, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Radio singalila


The article Radio singalila has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability: only ref is a broken link to its own website, though Google search suggests it does probably actually exist.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pam D  08:08, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

How to edit on a talk page
Please read Talk page guidelines.

Your edits above in the section are very confusing. Please stick to the rules of editing talk pages. In particular:
 * Never edit anyone else's post. This includes editing any quotes within their posts. You are allowed to delete an entire post or conversation from your own talk page, but if you do so you must delete any responses to that post as well.
 * When you reply to a post, please indent your response by using the colon ":", as many times as is needed to set your post slightly to the right of the point you are replying to.
 * Please do not make substantial changes to your own edits without acknowledging them by saying so at the end of the post, or signing it again. People reader and reply to posts, and if you then change the post they have replied to it can become chaotic. Pam  D  10:56, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Xavier Academy and article ownership
I noticed your coment at User_talk:The_Banner. (And please use a more informative section heading in future: "April 2015" looks like a heading added by a templated message, as I have pointed out before).

You complain about the current title of the article, but this is the title which the school uses on its own website. There is no evidence for any other title for the school, although because of the way that Wikipedia works we have "redirects" from all the previous titles of the school, so everyone will be able to find the article even if they use one of the other versions.


 * 1) You created the article at the title Xavier Academy Higher Secondary School, Kathamandu. That title had two problems: you spelled the city name wrong, and it was not needed as there is no other school with an English Wikipedia article with that name.
 * 2) I then moved it to Xavier Academy Higher Secondary School because it did not need the city name
 * 3)  then moved it to Xavier Academy because that is the title used on the school's own website.

has done a lot of good work in tidying up the article to make it meet the encyclopedia's standards. He also added a link to the school's official website, which is very useful.

The Banner removed a table you had added with statistics about the school. I've added a more standard "infobox" and put those same statistics into that infobox. Editors work together to improve articles.

The article is now short but accurate. If you have any other important information about the school, supported by Reliable sources, please add it to expand the article.

In your post on The Banner's talk page you say "never change the page like this on my page which you have done here". It is not your page. It is a page in Wikipedia, the international encyclopedia which can be edited by anyone. You do not own any page. You do not even own your own user page and talk page, although you are allowed a lot more control on those two pages. If you are not ready to edit collaboratively, please consider stopping editing. Pam D  07:18, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

And in terms of user(ASCII..) he had done good works in your eyes when you are monitoring my habits of editing so,tell me what's the meaning when the section heading are c removed? Don't inspire him like this as other editor can repeat the uncostructive works.But don't get me wrong as I am talking about article not personal issues.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 08:20, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I to Xavier Academy but not . You may be talking about these edits:   . In all these edits, I removed information "…selected as top 10 +2 Colleges" as it seems much of promotion and also unreferenced and my edits are not unconstructive. -- <span style="color:#196666; background-color: #DAFAFA; border: 1px solid #196666; padding: 5px; border-radius: 16px 8px 16px 8px;"><font color="#196666">Ascii002  (<font color="#196666">talk  · <font color="#196666">contribs  · <font color="#196666">guestbook ) 12:19, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

as to the post reply to banner on the talk page of banner about the article Page (Xavier Academy) and please Anamol Sir, you are thanked indeed for whatever you did and hope you will keep it up in your journey of editing for Wikipedia and you see the article is not indeed any such a fake so, i included the informations contained herewith the article and constructed few section headings as well but these were found in form of erased from root.Anyway,you cleaned them up in your own views and left as stub,didn't you?Mahendra Niraula (talk) 16:32, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Xavier Academy again
Why did you replace the infobox by maintenance templates? <span style="font-family:'Old English Text MT',serif;color:green">The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 17:39, 11 April 2015 (UTC)


 * : You know,I did it with the following reasons:
 * 1.The article was substantially changed and removed the section heading too which made my original creation asa over told falsely and I have avoided the table as it didn't look attractive. Mahendra Niraula (talk) 18:22, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * : adding a "ping" which will actually work - ie using correct user name. Pam  D  18:53, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

As a related point: please give edit summaries with all your edits so that other editors can see what you are trying to do or why you are making the changes you make. Thank you. Pam D  18:00, 11 April 2015 (UTC)


 * : Sorry, I would do that but i forgot to do it so.So please could you tell me with no feeling any noisances(troubles) how to build the user page like of (Ascii002) with the view of multiple color using?Mahendra Niraula (talk) 18:22, 11 April 2015 (UTC)


 * How can you "forget" how to add edit summaries when every time you save an edit you are invited to add one? As for a fancy user page: please concentrate on learning how to do plain useful edits first.  Pam  D  18:27, 11 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Sorry,I happened so and I realized only after you posted me that above message. And what do you mean by (fancy user page) here? You meant(page for amusement)? Mahendra Niraula (talk) 19:30, 11 April 2015 (UTC)


 * By "fancy user page" I meant "the user page like of (Ascii002) with the view of multiple color using": I understood you to be asking how to make an elaborate, or "fancy", user page using several colours, like that at User:Ascii002. If that is not what you meant then I have no idea what you did mean. Pam  D  21:43, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * yea,you are great person because that's whatever you have understood I meant.And what to be done to build that kind of user page?I would be glad if you taught me well about that.Are you understanding well all messages those I am posting you on my talk page above please? And report me if you are still not so that I will check to the place where I have made mistake. Mahendra Niraula (talk) 01:27, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

This has gone on for long enough
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.


 * The discussion is here: Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Several editors have tried to help you but you still show so little understanding of Wikipedia that you still think it right to sign your name to an article as you did (among other problems) in your edit earlier today to Ishibu.  Pam  D  18:35, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

I am really sorry for that incident appeared on the article (Ishibu) because it happened due to the reasons. 1.You believe or not but it's real that when I had opened my article page today, at the mean time l had to go somewhere for an emergency work and I had left that mobile opened with the article but unfortunately, a friend who is new to Wikipedia edited that page a little like (external reference) added unknowingly and typed my name at the end not by me that happened you believe ?Mahendra Niraula (talk) 19:16, 11 April 2015 (UTC)


 * And you have reported my user page to admin notice board with a lot multiple issues and please if you are reporting that on the ground of these above problems then sorry,don't do that I will go on improving my every habits which have formed as harmful.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 19:16, 11 April 2015 (UTC)


 * You should comment on the ANI page - it is out of my hands. Pam  D  19:21, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Family of Niraula,Ishibu


A tag has been placed on Family of Niraula,Ishibu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pam D  08:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

English Language Improvement
Hi! Iunderstandingrstand you are frustrated with the deletions of your edits on Wikipedia and would be willing to help. The main issue seems to be that your standard written English is not acceptable for publication in Wikipedia. I have taught College English Composition for over 22 years and, please believe me, your standard written English is not acceptable for publication in Wikipedia, which is the hard fact the Administrators and other Editors are trying to tell you. Just accept that and move on. However, I am willing to help you if you care to me?I have over 100 students a year on Wikipedia and most of them are non-native speakers, so I a know what I am doing. Message me if you like. If not, that is OK. HullIntegrity \ talk / 15:19, 13 April 2015 (UTC)


 * :Hello, it's my Nepali respect (Namaskar) to you if you are from any English countries and wanted to move ahead that I agree on your advices and instructions as well and as to indicated above,I am not already become very frustrated for anything except for deletion of article page created newly and also edits.You know, I am a student of English linguistic and English language which is a essential subject for students of studying English opt. here in[Nepal]].In the beginning of my study in English language the comprehension and reading ability was very low or poor and I think now it's becoming a success my standard of English than to that of before. As to message you post to Me, why not? I am preety eager to have a help from you and wanted to ask you whether my messages are comprehensible or not. It's not been very long that I have been joined on the Wikipedia. Language competence can be improved at any cost but I think, the daily replying messages to editors would help more than just of learning by looking up on grammar,do you think so?Ok,but a editor says me that wikipedia is not that place where english languagd is hardly taught,then again you say,"i have over 100 students a year on wikipedia" yoh teach on wikipedia or in your college to those mass of students please? Andcould you tell me about my edits on Phuwatapa Village how effective it is?Mahendra Niraula (talk) 20:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Please remember to check that your edits have worked: you needed a new line and an indent to display your comment correctly (I have fixed it). Also, that editor's name is actually HullIntegrity (ie the 3 identical-looking letters are two small "l"s and one capital "I") - but it's impossible to see that in his signature so I can see how you got it wrong and sympathise with you. Pam  D  20:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * :Sorry for understanding wrongly above on the page and it happpens like that sometime.Never mind or forget it please! It's just a normal mistakes appeared on the page of such a non- native editor and again what i can see that you try to centralise to make a massive issue even such a small subject like a (sign) of user hullIntegrity rather than to advise and give me clues to edit more effectively.Anyway, glad to edit.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 01:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Mahendra, I have removed 2 spaces at the start of your comment so it doesn't go off the edge of the screen. You need to start your comment on the far left, without spaces. 220  of  Borg 02:25, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

This is what happens if you have a space right at the left, if your comment is long enough it goes right off the edge of the screen. 220  of  Borg 02:25, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * As PamD indicated, my user name is actually HullIntegrity (as in Hull Integrity as one word). I do not mind if you post on my talk page so you do not have to ping me. HullIntegrity  \ talk / 21:35, 13 April 2015 (UTC)


 * As to your messages above here, what I have understood that the message that I write to you are more readable when I wrote them on your talk page, am I right?Mahendra Niraula (talk) 01:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * No. You typed my username wrong here so it did not alert me. In any case, you can email me at dr.c.jason.smith@gmail.com and I can direct you to the online tutorials that I use for my students. Cheers. HullIntegrity  \ talk / 11:58, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * It's okay if so. And happy new year 2072 B.s.(New year of Nepal)! which may bring in your family a mindful happiness and prosperity,peace,new zeal,enthusiasm throughout the year and your may your journey be cheerful on Wikipedia but as for me,I have already been blocked from editing despite my innocency. And as to your willingness to teach me something about English language,I would be happy to learn more effectively the English language but I am not currently using (Gmail) and am using just Facebook and Twitter. Mahendra Niraula (talk) 12:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * You can find my Facebook page on my Wikipedia userpage under "More About Me". Feel free to send me a friend request. Cheers. HullIntegrity  \ talk / 21:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * What about reaching my ID( Mahendra Niraula)on Facebook. Com.np? But,remembere that there are numerous peoples with the same name and to detect easily my ID,type Mahendra Niraula (talk) 19:29, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Block notice
Hi there. Per the recent discussion at ANI, you have been blocked from editing for an initial period of three months. As noted in my closing ANI comments, while you may continue to interract via this talk page, it is not a forum for you to improve your English. I recommend that you enable the email option from your preferences so that anyone wishing to help you may do so off-Wiki. I am sorry that it has come to this but the integrity of the Encyclopedia is paramount. You are welcome to return and continue editing once your English skills have improved to the level where you are able to make a worthwhile contribution. Good luck! Philg88 ♦talk 05:16, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

This is a bad idea. Don't post an unblock request and falsely indicate that it has been accepted by an administrator; indeed, it only provides further indication that the consensus at the ANI thread was the correct one. --<font face="Book Antiqua"> Kinu   t/c 06:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If that's not the good idea, then how to make process to be unblocked quickly?Do you have any such ideas which enable my IP to open soon?Mahendra Niraula (talk) 07:12, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Editing through an IP would be block evasion. It's preferred you don't tread that road. -- QEDK ♠  T  ♥  C  15:12, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * As far as I can see, in the diff, he has not "falsely indicated that it has been accepted by an administrator". He's just accused Philg88 (the admin) of blocking him unjustly. -- QEDK ♠  T  ♥  C  15:16, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * "Unblocked per above" suggests otherwise, but make of it what you will. --<font face="Book Antiqua"> Kinu   t/c 15:17, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd put it down to incompetence rather than a deliberate attempt to mislead - looks to me as if he thought that "unblocked" was the template to frame his unblock request. Most blocking notices offer a "this is how to appeal against your block", but in this case the blocking admin seems to have decided there was no point in offering the option, perhaps because there was unanimity at ANI (though I notice that Appealing_a_block says "Instructions for requesting an unblock will be placed on your talk page or in the block explanation.", which wasn't the case here). Looking further, I think he meant to use unblock. Fairly typical of his accuracy (see various unsuccessful "ping"s). Pam  D  17:06, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * PamD's actually got it right. And it's not like I'm saying you made a mistake, it was actually quite difficult to comprehend. -- QEDK  ♠  T  ♥  C  17:36, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Please, do not do it...
Mahendra, you are blocked for clear reasons, amongst other that your English is too poor to work on ENWP as a certain competence is needed.

But now it looks that you are evading this block by using IPs. Please, stop with that straight away or much more misery will come over you, including more and longer bans. Please! <span style="font-family:'Old English Text MT',serif;color:green">The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 10:54, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * An obvious sockpuppet has already been blocked, and I have also rangeblocked the IP range which is presumably being used by this editor. Continuing to evade this block will lead to an extension of the block on this account to an indefinite one. --<font face="Book Antiqua"> Kinu   t/c 16:05, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

But,the discussion was going on and the possibility of agreeing on that"report" was close and an admin (kinu) blocked suddenly before our discussion was over or came to conclusion, therefore, please banner, you can see very clearly now that how is being swept away to the new comers and new editors from a host home(Wikipedia) or if a new comer is appearing as a guest or visitor in Nepal here,then the visitor is welcomed warmly and treated as a god or considered the god but when a Nepali fellow editor had entered in host home,English, then he was treated very well for a moment but was not allowed to stay more than a night at your home by making multiple pretendings and fraudulents, wasn't it?Sorry, banner this "satire" is not for you,mind it that this is for those who don't have a manner to receive guests and treat them well.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 17:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * No, the issue of incompetence was loud and clear for everybody to see. This scribble is also proof of your incompetence in mastering the English language not to mention your failure to notice that my nickname is "The Banner" and not "banner".
 * And I repeat the warning not to make use of sockpuppets or IPs to evade your block. <span style="font-family:'Old English Text MT',serif;color:green">The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 18:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Admin kinu,I need to respect you saying " sir" because you are an (admin) by your position on Wikipedia here and I am very low quality of knowledgeable guy,and again into have no such a standard in edits,and also the standard of English language is so,then I have no ability to argue with you more than it and will not do even that ever since now.Whether you do understand this post written by that incompetent editor or not,but if you do this, then it's ok ,and again if you don't do it even that is OK.I have no thing to say now and I am still afraid of your warning about "longer blocking"that, if I continued complaining about it more,then I will be blocked more that definite time of 3 months.You had better to make lifelong blocked my IP but only 3 months. I have noticed too many edits made in simple English and if you would like to see some of them,then click hereBardibas and monitor the edit and find out whether it is proper to write the name of the editor at the end of the edit that is made.One of my issue is linked to the same article here that I have offered you to glance once and such a trifle matters were made like a large issues.It's OK,I have no any ways to complain more this and if you think this have made mistakenly, then see once more and considere more on how this only editor is being blamed.Never think it that it's personal attack.

.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 17:18, 19 April 2015 (UTC)


 * MN has still not learned how to "ping" you accurately. Pam  D  17:54, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saraswati Secondary School
Hello Mahendra Niraula,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Saraswati Secondary School for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Roshan014 (talk) 11:44, 18 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Your CSD tag was incorrect: this article was created before the user was blocked, and it also had substantial edits by other editors. Please read the criteria for CSD tags more carefully before continuing to tag articles. WP:G5 is the one you are misusing here. The same thing applies to the next 3 nominations. All 4 tags have been reverted. Pam  D  18:09, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Annapurna Secondary English Boarding School
Hello Mahendra Niraula,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Annapurna Secondary English Boarding School for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Roshan014 (talk) 11:45, 18 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Incorrect CSD has been reverted - see above. Pam  D  18:09, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Myanglung Campus
Hello Mahendra Niraula,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Myanglung Campus for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Roshan014 (talk) 11:45, 18 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Incorrect CSD has been reverted - see above. Pam  D  18:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eagle FM (Nepal)
Hello Mahendra Niraula,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Eagle FM (Nepal) for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Roshan014 (talk) 12:00, 18 April 2015 (UTC)


 * : Hello, Roshan sir,thank you for your trial of patrolling to article page( new) and what I have understood about " article for deletion"that it's nominated for only a discussion to find out that if the article has ref and cites and also I have understood that if an editor has been blocked from editing, then the article left for publication are not touched making the issues of IP block ,it's because the articles should be remained on Wikipedia for about 5 years until the sources and reliable cites have been procured.But,you are scaring me already by saying " article written under blocked IP are removed or deleted, how?No,any new pages have been created shortly after the IP has been blocked, considere this as well, dear editor since you are new editor like me.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 18:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Roshan014's CSD tag was incorrect and has been removed. See above. Pam  D  18:11, 19 April 2015 (UTC)


 * - I tried to fix MN's mangled "reply to" above, but I don't think it will have worked as I was not signing the section at the same time. Pinging you now to alert you to his attempt to communicate with you. Pam  D  18:14, 19 April 2015 (UTC)


 * : Thank you so much ma'am for your small help in reverting those unnecessary tags. I have heard that British people are very much helpful and they have much understanding,am I right? Since I am a south-Asian people lived in beautiful mountain country Nepal. I hope,you will make a request to the block maker admin (Kinu) a American citizen, from your personal side or on your behalf so that I would get a chance to bring more article to sketch them on Wikipedia here from Nepal. And a confusion that I have is that,am I able to claim to be a patrolling for new pages? Mahendra Niraula (talk) 18:53, 19 April 2015 (UTC)h


 * : Oh ! I am really sorry for blaming you of blocking my( ID) and thought this might have been via you but not.I eventually found out that it's all by another ( Admin) and I have indicated you that " you are from USA" even if you are from elsewhere because you have given your location and country on your user page being Indo-American,have not you?

If you are not been even there, I am sorry for that and you are indicating that you are from India.right?
 * It's better to indicate by saying(editor is now off) for Wikipedia so that the messaging each other turn by turn would be more easier than now.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 19:12, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If you seriously think that the issue here is a geographic, racial, or ethnic issue, and not your own inability to contribute here constructively, then you have only served to confirm that you are not competent enough to edit here. (You do realize I am of Indian ethnicity, right?) --<font face="Book Antiqua"> Kinu   t/c 05:25, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Summarising
Mahendra Niraula, You do not seem to understand the situation. Let me try to give an explanation.

You were blocked by the admin after a full discussion at the "Administrators' Noticeboard for Incidents", or ANI, which  you can read here. This followed a period when many different editors had found problems with your editing - your poor English, careless editing (or problems with your mobile phone), apparent difficulty in understanding some of Wikipedia's rules, addition of many web addresses which appeared to be "dead links" (or just plain incorrect web addresses, as several had spaces in them as you typed them), adding up to a lack of the "competence" necessary to edit English Wikipedia. Many of the editors who endorsed (ie supported) the suggestion that you should be blocked from editing used words like "reluctantly": we know that you have good intentions towards the encyclopedia and are keen that it should have more articles about your beautiful country. (Yes, I have visited Nepal too). The fact remains that your edits were doing more harm than good, and were taking the time of many other editors who were cleaning up your poor editing instead of working on other articles. Good will is not enough: Competence is Required.

I am not an admin. I am one of several editors who have tried to help you by explaining your mistakes and problems with your edits, but I eventually decided to ask admins and others to discuss your editing at ANI because you were continuing to cause the same problems. The discussion has nothing to do with your nationality, and you are being rude to other editors by suggesting that they are being racist. We welcome editors from all nationalities, if they are capable of doing more good than harm to the encyclopedia.

Please now find some other way to occupy your time - perhaps either editing Nepali Wikipedia, or concentrating on your English language studies. Best wishes, Pam  D  08:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Wow! It's a very excellent idea and thank you for your constructive suggestions.So,how could I edit even Nepali Wikipedia when I am already blocked from editing?Do I have any chances to edit English Wikipedia before that period of 3 months? But,I have noticed that just a week or so on times has been blocked IPs of any other editor who is new to  Wikipedia and as to me,I have been blocked in a length time since I am a new editor so, this also is a complaint among other.And I wish it may reduce the period of blocking time from 3 months.

And,I am not being rude and I have still not talked to any editors about their geographic, race,and ethnicity and think that that's just a discussion about any articles when those things are included here.You may be pointing out about that issue on the ground of a editor's compaint above here and if you are doing so,then you can review about that gossip and discussion that where I have talked including that words. Never believe until you have seen with your own eyes,consider before you do ssomething if that is only a rumour and do that after seeing clearly on your innocence eyes so that all works you do will be completed well. Yea,"Good will not enough,competence is required" on your opinion. But,first good will also is required before to be competent and then other thing will go on.Mahendra Niraula (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2015 (UTC)


 * And as to your doubt about web adress: Believe that I have not added any such URL artificially besides to have correct address and again I accept on this fact that the URL may be "dead link" since I might have made mistake in putting them in their original structure but never included any such fake web.


 * You are only blocked from editing on EN-WP, not on the Nepali WP. Just try it there... <span style="font-family:'Old English Text MT',serif;color:green">The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 12:28, 20 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Your walls of text on this page continue to show a lack of understanding as to the reason for your block. Ultimately, this is going nowhere constructive and is nothing more than a time sink for all parties involved. As a result, I am revoking your talk page access for the remainder of your current block, which is still set to expire in July. As stated above, evading your block, either by editing while not logged in or by creating a sockpuppet, both of which you have previously done, will result in your block being extended to an indefinite one. As has been suggested to you above, find something constructive to do. --<font face="Book Antiqua"> Kinu   t/c 12:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Alcohol hang over concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Alcohol hang over, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Alcohol hang over


Hello, Mahendra Niraula. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Alcohol hang over".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor Talk! 15:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Xavier Academy


A tag has been placed on Xavier Academy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from xa.edu.np/index.php?option=Xavier%20Academy. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Saraswati Secondary School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saraswati Secondary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Saraswati Secondary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pam D  07:16, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Global College of Management for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global College of Management is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Global College of Management until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. nirmal (talk) 05:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)