User talk:Mahewa/Archive 1

Thank you for voting


Thank you for voting in my RfA which at 51/20/6 unfortunately did not achieve consensus. In closing the nomination, Essjay remarked that it was one of the better discussed RfAs seen recently and I would like to thank you and all others who chose to vote for making it as such. It was extremely humbling to see the large number of support votes, and the number of oppose votes and comments will help me to become stronger. I hope to run again for adminship soon. Thank you all once more. Wikiwoohoo 20:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Citing Commercial Databases
I read that if I cite a resource that I read somewhere else, I need to say where it's from. If I'm getting an article from a commercial database (like LexisNexis) with no real link, and the article's no longer available from the source, how do I cite that?
 * This is where things get tricky. It is difficult to examine a source's validity if it is no longer available.  Sometimes when this happens a newer/more public source replaces the outdated/private source.  I would suggest the next time you read it you leave all of the information there, and definitely note the "Accessed Date" on the citation for reference.   - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  guestbook  ♦  contribs  18:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear, because I may have made it confusing, the article is still fully available on LexisNexis, and probably always will be. I meant that it's no longer available from, in this case, the Washington Time's website or any other public site that I can find.  There was no in the article originally, it was tagged as needing a citation.  I'm just now sure if/how I can indicate in the citation where it's available when there's no link available.  FYI, I'm referring to Mahewa (talk) 18:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Cite it such that someone with access to Lexis/Nexis or a paper copy of the newspaper's archives can find it. Paper, date, page, author... cite news is great for that.  Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 07:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. —  Tivedshambo   (t/c) 06:28, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles 06:56, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

hello
please stop vanadalizing my profile

thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.115.222.89 (talk) 19:54, 12 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry that you feel that way, but you actually don't have a profile. If you are referring to your talk page, it is my obligation in rolling back edits to issue proper warnings in the hope that you will confine your editing to properly sourced materials.  Considering that 4 editors had already given you cautions and that one of your edits was blatant vandalism in the form of unsubstantiated allegations of pedophilia against a living person, this was entirely appropriate, if not lenient. &Dagger; M A HE W A &Dagger;   &bull;   talk  20:14, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Unsorted Entry
sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.210.203.129 (talk) 01:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

RE:18 August 2010
Please revert the redirect. The original Yakouts page was written by non-Sakha person and probably second language speaker. The quality of language is substandard and factual information is distorted. So I'm reverting your reversion. The way this nations name is mostly known in English speaking world is probably Sakha, while I barely know any use of "Yakouts" in any high level literature. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.163.21 (talk) 02:56, 18 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I disagree. You are an unregistered user and blanked a page with a decent editing history over a year old to make it a redirect with no discussion on the talk page or explanation.  You should take this to the talk page before proceeding on this path.  &Dagger; M A HE W A &Dagger;   &bull;   talk  03:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Should that be considered even for such a substandard article? In my opinion the whole article needs a complete rewrite and not only ethnonym change. And as you can see, there already are a one year old name change proposal on article's discussion page. So I though that it would just totally ok to do that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.163.21 (talk) 03:41, 18 August 2010 (UTC)


 * As I said on the article's talk page, I have no expertise in this subject matter at all. I am perfectly content to let those who have that knowledge make that determination.  Your reasons sound perfectly valid, I simply believe that they should have been explained on the talk page.  Even if it doesn't rise to that level, it certainly should have been explained in the Edit Summary.  I still think it would be good form for you to add your reasoning to the talk page rather than relying on a reference to my talk page.  But thank you for taking time to make good faith efforts to improve Wikipedia.  If your concern is my comments on your talk page, I'd be happy to tune them down and make what my concerns are now more clear.  &Dagger; M A HE W A &Dagger;   &bull;   talk  04:00, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.163.21 (talk) 04:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

MV Stena Navigator
The page MV Stena Navigator is an exact copy of MS Stena Navigator. The majority of articles about motor vessels begin with 'MS' rather than 'MV'. So a redirect to MS Stena Navigator is justified. Philphos (talk) 15:15, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't disagree that the pages are redundant. But I don't think blanking a page and changing it to a redirect without even so much as an edit summary is appropriate or desirable.  Additionally, unless I'm missing something, the fact that these are duplicates does not excuse the application of Help:Merging which requires several additional steps to comply with licensing and so the history will be clear. &Dagger; M A HE W A &Dagger;   &bull;   talk  15:27, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Apologies for clearing the page. I shall reinstate the article and start the Help:Merging procedure. Philphos (talk) 15:37, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Larkin Community Hospital
Mahewa Please, delete the article about Larkin Community Hospital. You are an outstanding member of Wikipedia.

This is an article that does not meet the relevant and educative criteria for content of the encyclopedia and this stub is unsuitable, unhelpful, and does not meet the required criteria, giving a business or institutional negative image. This stub must be proposed to be deleted for a good cause. This is considered Vandalism because it is including only unofficial information from some local articles acting in a direction or course opposite to the real prestige of this organization (see the institution’s official page). This stub is demonstrating some intentional, personal, premeditate AND unethical behavior; because author only is encouraging to our community to review some past negative local scandalous articles with non-evidenced allegations from sensationalist’s acting against the reputation of this organization. (A scandal is a widely publicized allegation or set of allegations that damages the reputation of an institution, individual or creed) This short article is over-hyping insignificant events, being deliberately controversial, loud, self centered or acting to acquire a negative opinion of many people using wikipedia. PLEASE, if you want to write an article about this institution, you will refer to the positive history and important programs that this hospital has been offering to the community of South Florida over many years and they are also saying incorrectly the number of institutional beds. Defamation=calumny, vilification, slander (for transitory statements), and libel (for written, broadcast, or otherwise published words)—is the communication of a statement that makes a claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may give an individual, business, product, group, government, or nation a negative image. Please, take a positive and compassionate action! Thanks, God bless you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.34.156.194 (talk) 20:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry that I didn't respond to your message earlier, as I have been travelling. I will not take action to delete the page, for a couple of reasons.  First, I believe that the page meets Wikiepedia's notability guidelines.  Second, a discussion about deleting this article has already taken place here and the consensus was to keep the article.  While I agree with the outcome of this discussion, you are free to re-open the discussion by posting at Articles_for_deletion.  If you honestly feel that the page rises to the level of libel against a living person, you can post a request for action on this Noticeboard.  Normally, this would only be the case if the libel is against a person, not a group.
 * You bring up several reasons that the changes you made might be valid, but the proper way to handle this as someone who apparently has a strong interest in the article is to propose the changes on the Talk Page, and try to discuss the issues. The reason that your edits are tagged as vandalism is because you removed any negative attributes of the hospital while adding material which comes across as ad copy.  It could be that this over amplifies the negative or ignores the good, and that's a fine argument to make, but the judge of that is not the hospital's official page.  If you made uncontroversial edits (such as the number of beds) I know that I, for one, would not object or try to undo that action.  Those were only reversed because they were part of your overall edits.
 * If you need help pursuing any of the above methods, please don't hesitate to ask for help. All the best,  &Dagger; M A HE W A &Dagger;   &bull;   talk  04:58, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Dear Mahewa, Thank you for your detailed and useful answer. I admire your knowledge regarding the wikipedia procedures and your benevolence taking time from your life to share with others about this. Thank you for your orientations but unfortunately I am a professional woman without sufficient time for this kind of online dealings. So, I am petitioning to you to make the difference. As I know that you are a law student, I am writing to you, regarding the topic of “ethical behavior”, professional integrity, respect and human sensitivity. Benito Juarez wrote: “The respect for other's rights is the peace.” The law has been represented by a “balance” between the good and bad. So, if you are determined to keep this stub; I invite to you to equilibrate this piece of writing, because you are one of the best contributors to this website. I am sure that you can give the right sense to this article created by yourself; with positive and negative comments. It is not justice to write only negative local particulars that never were evidenced about anyone or any organization. Would you like people to refer publicly and negatively about the person you are or your business, penetrating deeply with premeditation in all your past fails, or making defamation and calumny without verification? This type of action or behavior is proper of a paparazzi or magazine editor. Let me tell you that I don’t have any special or personal interest in this stub; but simply I love honesty. I am sure that I will not need to make any of the procedures that you gently explained to me because I am sure that you can help me to delete or repair this. I specialize in analyzing and discovering the feelings of people through words and actions, and your act of taking minutes from your precious time to respond my petition and give me orientation, has demonstrated that you are an affable and adorable person with strong morals and humanitarian values. I desire all the best for your law career and I expect that you will be a faithful advocate of the human right for peace and justice.Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.34.156.194 (talk) 20:24, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

my b
my bad —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ak169808 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank semi-spam
Thanks for your support in my RfA, which was closed as successful. I hope to succeed in helping Wikipedia with the tools. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 15:14, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Dear Mahewa, Thank you for your detailed and useful answer. I admire your knowledge regarding the wikipedia procedures and your benevolence taking time from your life to share with others about this. Thank you for your orientations but unfortunately I am a professional woman without sufficient time for this kind of online dealings. So, I am petitioning to you to make the difference. As I know that you are a law student, I am writing to you, regarding the topic of “ethical behavior”, professional integrity, respect and human sensitivity. Benito Juarez wrote: “The respect for other's rights is the peace.” The law has been represented by a “balance” between the good and bad. So, if you are determined to keep this stub; I invite to you to equilibrate this piece of writing, because you are one of the best contributors to this website. I am sure that you can give the right sense to this article created by yourself; with positive and negative comments. It is not justice to write only negative local particulars that never were evidenced about anyone or any organization. Would you like people to refer publicly and negatively about the person you are or your business, penetrating deeply with premeditation in all your past fails, or making defamation and calumny without verification? This type of action or behavior is proper of a paparazzi or magazine editor. Let me tell you that I don’t have any special or personal interest in this stub; but simply I love honesty. I am sure that I will not need to make any of the procedures that you gently explained to me because I am sure that you can help me to delete or repair this. I specialize in analyzing and discovering the feelings of people through words and actions, and your act of taking minutes from your precious time to respond my petition and give me orientation, has demonstrated that you are an affable and adorable person with strong morals and humanitarian values. I desire all the best for your law career and I expect that you will be a faithful advocate of the human right for peace and justice.Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.34.156.194 (talk) 13:55, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Michigan Wikipedians!
Greetings Mahewa! I noticed that you made mention of the University of Michigan on your userpage. If you are a current undergraduate or graduate student there, I would like to welcome you, on behalf of the  Wikipedians of the University of Michigan, to a group meeting on Wednesday October 20, 2010. The meeting will be held at 7:00 PM (EST) in the University of Michigan Chemistry Building, room 1201. New and experienced editors alike are most welcome to come and partake in the collaboration and outreach of Wikipedia in a real-life setting. Questions? Leave me a message here or at my talk page on Wikimedia Outreach, and feel free to email the group at wikipedians@umich.edu. The Wikipedians of the University of Michigan are excited to see you there!   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 21:51, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:55, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Hey, thanks for keeping an eye out for my userpage! thoriyan 19:09, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome. &Dagger; M A HE W A &Dagger;   &bull;   talk  19:33, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

userip
The edits I made to ChaCha were entirely true. Please change it back. I'm doing a study on ChaCha at the moment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.29.191.9 (talk) 19:39, 2 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for coming to discuss the edits with me. You'll have to forgive me, but I find your claims a little drastic without support.  You're making a claim that ChaCha, which is defined by the fact that it has human answering rather than computers, uses only automated processes.  You need to have references to back that up before changing the article and deleting large portions it.  Do you have any references that support your claims?  &Dagger; M A HE W A &Dagger;   &bull;   talk  19:46, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Citing Personal Correspondence : Letters and responses from Government Ministries
Dear Mahewa, I apologize if I have not chosen the format or venue for asking questions. I have written to, and received responses from Environment Canada on issues pertaining to e-waste, Basel convention, Basel ban amendment. These responses from Environment Canada I believe offer pertinent information for commenting here in wikipedia. How does one reference or make available personal letters from government agencies so others may review it as a reference? I'll cite an example here to put it in context for you.

Exact Content of letter to me from Environment Canada ..."Canada has not ratified the Basel Ban Amendment, because the Government of Canada continues to believe that the Ban is not consistent with international trade rules and does not reflect a Party's true capacity to manage recyclables in an environmentally sound manner..."

My written response to the government was

..."By what measure does the Canadian Government judge a particular parties "true capacity to manage recyclables" or ensure it is conducted in an "environmentally sound manner"? Is there an approved method of inspection or review process that the Canadian Government uses or looks to for evaluation and review of a party's capabilities?"

- As of yet the Ministry has been unable to provide the details cited above, effectively they don't have a system. The example above cites Government policy yet they have no actual written policy or management system in place to do what they say they are doing. So how does one cite pertinent personal correspondence with a Government?

Thanks for your time... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurt Dundy (talk • contribs) 02:34, 3 July 2011


 * Hello Kurt, your asking a question here is fine, though you should remember to sign your comments pretty much any where other than an article with four tildes: .  I'm afraid I don't have an answer for your question that you'll find very satisfying.  You cannot cite letters as a source.  Wikipedia, like other encyclopedias, is not meant to be primary source document.  What I mean by that is that Wikipedia should possess only generally available verifiable information.  If you have information only known to you or a select few people,  this is not the proper venue for you to share the information, especially if it is about a living person.


 * I understand that this must be frustrating because you seem to have a worthy cause. But Wikipedia is not a place for causes.  Please let me know if you have any other questions.  &Dagger; M A HE W A &Dagger;   &bull;   talk  12:52, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

 * Thank you! It was a pleasure working with you as well.  &Dagger; M A HE W A &Dagger;   &bull;   talk  13:29, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Edits on Prof Nalin de Silva BLP
I found newspaper references for the stuff from the forums and replaced them. Now all the references that I've added are from articles that Prof Nalin De Silva wrote himself, or from the University of Kelaniya (his employer) profile page for him. Hope those are considered reliable sources. Sanjaythelostboy (talk) 05:17, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

ANI
FYI, the ANI thread in which you participated concerning User:Marine 69-71 has reopened. ScottyBerg (talk) 14:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Re your comment: there is no harm in asking, if you feel that way. It may or may not be sufficient to qualify you as a certifier. I just don't know. I do believe at this point that there will be an RfC-Admin if this cannot be resolved, which hopefully will happen. ScottyBerg (talk) 17:34, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Re:Possible solution
Personal problems and the preperation of my defense have taken some of my time. I do not believe that I should give up my admin. powers, however I will auto impose a probation upon myself in which i will not use my admin powers for at least a year. I encourage you to monitor my behavior, if I fail to live up to the expectations then I will do the honorable thing. Tony the Marine (talk) 21:55, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:China
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:China. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 02:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wedge strategy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Wedge strategy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:05, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on User talk:WalkerThrough
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on User talk:WalkerThrough. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 03:06, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Lists
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Lists. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:32, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 08:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mellanox Technologies
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mellanox Technologies. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:15, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Art Pope
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Art Pope. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative
Hi Mahewa,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The  Helpful  Bot  16:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Indian rupee
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Indian rupee. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:IQ and the Wealth of Nations
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:IQ and the Wealth of Nations. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Falun Gong
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Falun Gong. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:15, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jewish Internet Defense Force
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jewish Internet Defense Force. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:15, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Interim dividend
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Interim dividend. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 11:15, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Eddie Rocket's
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Eddie Rocket's. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:15, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of CBS television affiliates (table)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of CBS television affiliates (table). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:15, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Georgia State University
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Georgia State University. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:IMG Academy
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:IMG Academy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 12:16, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jaycar
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jaycar. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 13:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2012
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2012. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 13:15, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rotherham by-election, 2012
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Rotherham by-election, 2012. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 13:15, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BP
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:BP. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 14:05, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Extant organization
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Extant organization. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fordham University
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fordham University. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 15:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)