User talk:Mahmadshawady

Welcome!

Hello, Mahmadshawady, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome!

– Fayenatic  L ondon 21:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Druze has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:54, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Druze was changed by Mahmadshawady (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85171 on 2016-12-01T18:54:54+00:00.

Speedy deletion nomination of CloseForArtProductionMahmadElShawady


A tag has been placed on CloseForArtProductionMahmadElShawady requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RileyBugzYell at me &#124; Edits 22:09, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (CloseForArtProductionMahmadElShawady) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating CloseForArtProductionMahmadElShawady, Mahmadshawady!

Wikipedia editor JustBerry just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Welcome to Wikipedia! Feel free to check out WP:SANDBOX to make test edits."

To reply, leave a comment on JustBerry's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

JustBerry (talk) 22:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mandaeism— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   08:42, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mandaeans in Sweden. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Fayenatic  L ondon 21:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Mandaeism. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   16:54, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Druze. – Fayenatic  L ondon 21:05, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing, as you did at Druze. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. – Fayenatic  L ondon 08:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Major film studio. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 09:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.