User talk:Mahrabu

Partnership minyan
Could you provide a source that many liberal Jews object to partnership minyanim? From WP Policy Citing sources
 * The need for citations is especially important when writing about opinions held on a particular issue. Avoid weasel words such as, "Some people say…" Instead, make your writing verifiable: find a specific person or group who holds that opinion, mention them by name, and give a citation to a reputable publication in which they express that opinion. Remember that Wikipedia is not a place for expressing your own opinions or for original research.

If you read through the talk:Partnership minyan page, you'll see that we went through a similar process for this page when some folks on Orthodoxy's right wing expressed some very strong but unsourced views. Gotta be fair here.

--Shirahadasha 00:07, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

As an FYI, there seem to be a lot of people who may have a different theoretically orientation who nonetheless find the partnership minyan concept to their liking, e.g. (search for Shira Hadasha):


 * http://www.aepi.org/newsevents/News/DavidsAliyah.htm
 * http://www.masorti.org/programs/media/media/archive2000-2003/12212003.html
 * http://www.hamakomtheplace.org/reader.html
 * http://wct.org/tikkun/israel/israeltrips/
 * http://katyandgeoffrey.blogspot.com/2005/05/explorations-in-communal-prayer.html
 * http://dailydoseofanna.blogspot.com/2004_09_01_dailydoseofanna_archive.html
 * http://lisadelson.blogspot.com/2004_08_01_lisadelson_archive.html

--Shirahadasha 01:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Hebrew spelling of minyan.
Can't believe I misspelled minyan. All I can say is "oops," and THANKS for the correction! :) NearTheZoo (talk) 23:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Photos for independent minyanim article.
Mahrabu, You may have noticed that the only two photos I was able to use for the article on independent minyanim were from two in the Washington, D.C. area. Since it is obvious you are knowledgeable, and perhaps experienced, when it comes to these minyanim, I'd like to ask that you consider uploading and using some others -- especially from minyanim like Hadar and Shira Hadasha that are explicitly mentioned in the article. Thanks! NearTheZoo (talk) 16:46, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kol Zimrah


The article Kol Zimrah has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jayjg (talk) 00:49, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Leo Baeck
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Leo Baeck, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Nazgul02 (talk) 13:29, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

The Yankles
Mahrabu, you and I had extensive discussions over elements in the article I created regarding the independent minyan phenomenon, and you helped improve the article a great deal through those discussions. Now I'm writing this note just to let you know I created a short article on the movie "The Yankles," and if you have not heard of this movie you might enjoy looking at one of the trailers I included among the external links! It might not be the best movie in the world, but it made me smile, and it is very respectful to Jews and Judaism, even if it might not bat 1000 when it comes to every Jewish observance it mentions! Best wishes! NearTheZoo (talk) 14:20, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Heather Booth


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Heather Booth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  14:08, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Presidential line of succession
You took numbers away from people who had been arbitrarily designated as ineligible in an inconsistent fashion.As it is,some acting officials are shown as eligible and others,citizens or not,aren't...but I see no legal basis for treating Thomas Shannon and Adam Szubin differently,which you intensified with your edit.--L.E./12.144.5.2 (talk) 23:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

The distinction (which I didn't originate, but took from the rest of the article) is between acting officers who were confirmed by the Senate to their current positions (deputy secretary, etc.) and those who weren't.

Yeshiva Week moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Yeshiva Week, contains no content. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. lovkal (talk) 18:18, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Yeshiva Week


Hello, Mahrabu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yeshiva Week".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Masum Reza 📞 21:06, 25 July 2019 (UTC)