User talk:Maia.T.J.

April 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Macedonia (Greece), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 02:03, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 02:47, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 06:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello. I understand Wikipedia's policies against biased points of view. However, I messaged you previously about this same issue and you never responded, so I would appreciate an explanation as to why these policies apply more to some editors than others. Also, there was blatantly false information that I edited out of the pages that was instantly reverted back to its original content. I've explained how the previous editor made his or her own hypotheses about particular topics that were not supported by any source material on the wiki page. I've even posted on your talk page in explicit detail which specific comments I am talking about. I find this very unfair.