User talk:Mailer diablo/Archive 51

Coat of arms of Sealand listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Coat of arms of Sealand. Since you had some involvement with the Coat of arms of Sealand redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so).  Horologium  (talk) 22:52, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Sprawling
You deleted a page i created on the new sport of Sprawling back in 2006. I was gutted to hear about the planking accident/death in OZ (May 2011)- annoyed wikipedia deleted our sprawling reference as it is a safer version of the sport that probably predates planking! Can you advise on whati need to do to get the page reinstated if it still exists in the archive and repeat the checking process?

Rob247 (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC)Rob247

Deleted user page JeffHolton
Am curious as to why you deleted my user page on February 14, 2007. I just went to edit it and found that it's...gone.

Any reason?

Jeffholton (talk) 19:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

One Christmas
Hello,

Some time ago you deleted the page One Christmas, a short story by Truman Capote. As a courtesy, I am letting you know that I intend to recreate the page so it meets, at a minimum, Start Class standards. As such it will have in-line citations from multiple, non-trivial published works. As such I think it would meet the guidelines for Notability (books). In particular it would meet the "threshold standards", as well as criteria #1.

On a completely different note, I think A Diamond Guitar needs to go as it will never meet the guidelines above. I think I have marked it for deletion properly, but you seem to be an expert, so if you are inclined look it over, tag it, etc. per Wikipedia guidelines - that would be great. I put my rationale for deletion on the talk page.--Npd2983 (talk) 20:00, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Request for arbitration
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=434155582

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AArbitration%2FRequests%2FCase&action=historysubmit&diff=432600224&oldid=432464753

I respectfully request arbitration.

I am a parent of a child who has been harassed in Wikipedia. Upon investigation, I see that this person has harrassed other people for several years.

I wrote to Jimbo Wales, but uncivilised administrators removed the comment and promptly banned me. When I put my comments back, they used the convenient excuse of removing the comments because User:Parentsp was banned a day earlier. This is akin to corrupt police. What the arbitration committee should do is to carefully read what I wrote. There is not only harrassment but the offender is guilty of conflicts of interest (writing about his own company).

You may email me, if desire. I left my email address at User:Parentsp. I am Parentsp, Parentsp2, and Parentsp3. This would not have been necessary if people would just act like a civil person and not a corrupt police trying to destroy evidence. Just review my complaint.

I offered to show Jimbo Wales my identification but he said it was not necessary. Parentsp4 (talk) 03:33, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

RfC/U: Cirt
Mailer diablo, further to the recent Political activism request for arbitration and various arbitrators' comments at that request to the effect that there had not been to date an RfC/U on Cirt, please see Requests for comment/Cirt. Best, -- J N  466  13:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposal to extend the editing restrictions placed on User:Communicat
Hello, I have proposed that ArbCom extend the editing restrictions which it placed on at Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and would appreciate your views on this. Thank you Nick-D (talk) 11:51, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Tree shaping proposed decision
All editors' behavior should be looked and going by Elen of the Roads comment that due to family trouble she has been unable study this properly. Elen quote "I have the sense that there have been other people who have been problematic, but not the time to look at it deeper. It's unfortunate" Will you please come and comment here about this. Blackash  have a chat 08:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Dear Mailer diablo, A quick question...
Dear Mailer diablo,

A question from a Wikipedia complete novice. I just stumbled across the fact that someone apparently created a page on Wikipedia about me, which I never saw, and was then deleted (in 2007). From what I can understand about how the site works (very little), and forgive me if I have misunderstood this which is very probable, it looks like it might have been something to do with you. Firstly, I'm curious to know what was on the page in the first place, and wondered if there is anyway that I can still view it. Secondly, having stumbled upon what I gather were the comments exchanged in the process, they made my eyebrows raise a bit. I was a little bewildered by the tone and apparent hostility from people who didnt appear to know me or anything about me. Anything else I leave to your judgement, and wouldn't really know what to do anyway (I was quite please to have found your page here), but just for the record, I thought I should at least correct a couple of the comments from others...

1. [Unsourced (and has been so tagged for some time) article about totally non-notable author of non-notable book and handful of white papers Bigdaddy1981 05:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)] MY COMMENT: HAD I KNOWN THE PAGE EXISTED I'D HAPPILY PROVIDE SOURCES, AT LEAST ONCE I KNEW HOW TO ON THE PAGE. OBVIOUSLY PEOPLE ARE ENTITLED TO THEIR OPINIONS, BUT I'VE AUTHORED FIVE BOOKS, ALL HAVE HAD NATIONAL / INTERNATIONAL MEDIA COVERAGE, ONE OF WHICH WAS CONSIDERED AT LEAST A MODEST BESTSELLER IN THE NON-FICTION WORLD, AND HAVE AN ENTRY IN 'WHO'S WHO'

2. Delete A quick google search shows up no reliable hits for this subject. It is also impossible to verify the contents of this subject from third-party reliable sources as well. --Siva1979Talk to me 06:41, 6 August 2007 (UTC) MY COMMENT: THIS PERSON CANNOT HAVE LOOKED VERY HARD, THERE ARE THOUSANDS OF HITS THAT RANGE FROM BBC, TO FINANCIAL TIMES, NEW SCIENTIST MAGAZINE AND VARIOUS OTHER SOURCES (THE FINANCIAL TIMES POSITIVELY REVIEWED THE LAST BOOK, ALTHOUGH THAT WAS SINCE THIS COMMENT WAS MADE) Delete Vanispam that didn't get caught by the doorkeepers. -Drdisque 07:57, 6 August 2007 (UTC) MY COMMENT: I'M GUESSING THAT THE TERM VANISPAM IS AN ALLEGATION OF SELF-GENERATED (VANITY) SPAM - ON THAT, AS I MENTIONED, I DIDN'T EVEN KNOW THE PAGE EXISTED SO THAT IS NOT POSSIBLE Delete unless reliable sources are provided which show how he meets WP:BIO. Stifle (talk) 21:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC) MY COMMENT: HAD I KNOWN THE PAGE WAS THERE, OR EVER SEEN IT, AND IF I KNEW HOW TO, I WOULD BE VERY HAPPY TO PROVIDE ANY APPROPRIATE SOURCES.

Anway, thanks for you time, and sorry if this is from out-of-the-blue. It was an odd experience to stumble across this so long after the event.

Best wishes,

Andrew Simms — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.53.139 (talk) 11:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Atlantis of the Sands
Thanks for your note about the previously deleted page, of which I was unaware. I don't know what the deleted page content was but the current article is completely based on verifable facts.Shaibalahmar (talk) 12:23, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Money No Enough and Xiaxue
How are you, Mailer diablo? Hope arbitration is not eating up all your spare time. I believe you are aware of the extensive history of vandalism and BLP violations affecting the article Xiaxue, which continues even after I rewrote the article. Perhaps you could help monitor the article and, if appropriate, semi-protect it? I also rewrote Money No Enough and both articles are on peer review in preparation for GA nominations. A review of Money No Enough or review of Xiaxue would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. 谢谢. Terima kasih. Arigato. If I am still actively editing when you are trying to get to Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151 to GA status, I would be more than happy to comment at its peer review. All the best to you, both in real life and Wikipedia! --J.L.W.S. The Special One (talk) 10:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Signpost Interview

 * Brought to you by Simply south...... eating shoes for 5 years So much for ER 18:28, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Milan's page
Hi David, sorry, but my information on Milan's page are correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.15.146.144 (talk) 11:23, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK nominations reviews
Hi,

I see that your an active reviewer of DYKs, would you mind taking a look at the two below. It would be much appreciated, not to worry if you can't. Thank you.


 * Template:Did you know nominations/The Longford Trust‎
 * Template:Did you know nominations/Edward Fitzgerald (barrister)

Kind regards, -- Ratio: Scripta  · [ Talk ] 20:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Csd-tip
Template:Csd-tip has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Cirt and Jayen466/Proposed decision#Proposed remedies (motion to close)
Arbitration/Requests/Case/Cirt and Jayen466/Proposed decision

Hi - There appears to be a motion to close this case later today. In the case that you have not noticed - there are two new proposals predented by Newyorkbrad - 3.3.2.1 Cirt restricted from BLPs and 3.3.2.2 Cirt restricted from "political" biographies - that you have not voted in. Thank you for your attention to this. - Off2riorob (talk) 01:58, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Please coment at Pathlight School's ongoing peer review!
Thanks for all your contributions to Wikipedia, especially Singapore-related articles! I have written an article about Pathlight School, a Singaporean special school for autistic children, and am aiming to make it Wikipedia's first GA pertaining to special education. You are invited to comment at its ongoing peer review; any and all constructive feedback would be most appreciated. All the best in all your endeavours! --J.L.W.S. The Special One (talk) 03:11, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Recover deleted page?
Hi,

Way back in 2007 a proposed page was deleted:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hendy%27s_Law

under your administration.

I was wondering if it is possible to recover this page? I think the quoting of this term has expanded since then and could now be justified.

Is the original content recoverable or would I need to restart?

Thanks.

Barry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barry.hendy (talk • contribs) 02:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigations/Andreas2009
Hey. On this case, were you saying that Marcobadotti is unlikely related to Andreas or Giorgoos? —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:37, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Advice or help needed

 * Hello MD, sorry to disturb you at this wee hour of the morning. Are you still around to help? -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 16:51, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Anything I can help? - Mailer Diablo 17:01, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Uhm... could I ask that this discussion to be held centrally in one single place, here? Thank you. Anyway, the problem is that of City Harvest Church, a slow edit warring has been going on for some time now, being conducted by newly registered editors & IP socks (most likely members of CHC) without properly discussing things on the discussion page. Could I ask you to protect the page temporarily until the kinks has been ironed out? Thank you for your patience and time, best. -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 17:13, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I give it 24 hours first, a symbolic gesture to get everyone on the talkpage. If it still occurs after that I'll extend it to a week. - Mailer Diablo 17:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated but I suspect that it won't deter them from doing so again, might I suggest to keep it in your watchlist? Thanks again and goodnight! -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 17:31, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * MD, I need your advice on a single individual who has kept up his/her sockpuppetry on the abovementioned article page, see User talk:182.55.241.225 and Talk:City Harvest Church for more details. Actually, I'm of the opinion to block both the throwaway accounts, they both reek strongly of WP:Single-purpose account. Thoughts? -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 17:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The time of the edits from the IPs and two accounts don't overlap, from behaviour alone without running CU looks obvious he's the same person. I'll AGF so long he sticks to his one current account and sits down to discuss on the article talkpage instead of edit warring. - Mailer Diablo 05:54, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * MD, I accept that but could you please semi-protect the article page for a while, I have some informations indicating that more anon IPs or newly registered users will be hitting the article page over the weekend. TBH, I don't want this "Joy Tong" and "ST" citations to be used to blow up into a major incident when we can nip it in the bud right now, thanks and cheers~! -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 22:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Sigh. 2 weeks semi it is. - Mailer Diablo 02:15, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but we have another problem now... this anon IP is obviously a member of the church and has been very disruptive on the discussion page, would a block be appropriate? Thoughts? -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 17:42, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The time of the edits from the IPs and two accounts don't overlap, from behaviour alone without running CU looks obvious he's the same person. I'll AGF so long he sticks to his one current account and sits down to discuss on the article talkpage instead of edit warring. - Mailer Diablo 05:54, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * MD, I accept that but could you please semi-protect the article page for a while, I have some informations indicating that more anon IPs or newly registered users will be hitting the article page over the weekend. TBH, I don't want this "Joy Tong" and "ST" citations to be used to blow up into a major incident when we can nip it in the bud right now, thanks and cheers~! -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 22:15, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Sigh. 2 weeks semi it is. - Mailer Diablo 02:15, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but we have another problem now... this anon IP is obviously a member of the church and has been very disruptive on the discussion page, would a block be appropriate? Thoughts? -- Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 17:42, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but we have another problem now... this anon IP is obviously a member of the church and has been very disruptive on the discussion page, would a block be appropriate? Thoughts? -- <i style="font-family:Rage Italic; font-size:large; color:green;">Dave</i> ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 17:42, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Recover deleted page?
Sorry - I am not sure how to properly respond to this discussion ....

You proposal to copy it to my userspace sounds great thank you.

--Barry.hendy (talk) 22:36, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Need your help
Hello Mailer diablo,

One of the article Celoxis I wrote in wiki was deleted and I understand the reason of the deletion. I intended to put this article for the information and not for the advertisement. I am here to provide all the required information on Celoxis as a company and need your help in submitting the article again as it is my first article on wikipedia. Below are some references for Celoxis

Some references
 * Business.com (http://www.business.com/guides/online-project-management-2191/)
 * PC World (http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/142807/simpler_projectmanaging_apps_get_the_job_done.html)
 * TopTen Reviews (http://online-project-management-review.toptenreviews.com/)
 * CeoWorld (http://ceoworld.biz/ceo/2011/04/01/top-10-best-online-project-management-services-review-for-ceos-and-entrepreneurs)

Are you around to help? 61.8.140.170 (talk) 11:10, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * You need to include not just references, but reliable 3rd party sources. Only the PC World one seem to stand up to the test. You'll need to look for more such sources and address the concerns in the AfD if you want your recreated article to take hold. - Mailer Diablo 06:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you Mailer for your response. The references I listed are reliable. Business.com is one of the well know business search engine. They reviewed Online Project Management softwares and has listed Celoxis as one of the online project management software. TopTen Reviews is also a very well known website which ranks the product on their capabilities and Celoxis is one of the ranked product on TopTen reviews. Also, these Business.com and TopTen Reviews are listed on Wikipedia, so they would have been already authenticated. However, if you still think these are not reliable resources, can you please let me know the reasons. 61.8.140.170 (talk) 10:03, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * These are my recommendations based on past experience, I'm just saying how you can better your chances; Wikipedians prefer sources that are easily recognizable by everyone. - Mailer Diablo 10:21, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe the sources provided will be easily recognized as they are well known sources. To take this further, can you please let me know the next step to restore the Celoxis page, so that I can modify it to enter all appropriate information as per Wikipedia policies. 61.8.140.170 (talk) 12:26, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you please guide me to take this issue further. 61.8.140.170 (talk) 05:52, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * You should register an account in order to re-create the article with the revised text. Otherwise, try WP:AFC. - Mailer Diablo 06:35, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay. I will register and try to re-create the article with revised text. But it will allow me create the article with same name Celoxis? If not please guide me how to create the article with same name. 61.8.140.170 (talk) 10:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It will allow, unless an admin deletes it again. - Mailer Diablo 11:42, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Shanghai Metro Line 10
Wow!

You didn't waste much time in updating the page about yesterday's accident.

Well done, Chinarail (talk) 01:16, 28 September 2011 (UTC) Chinarail

Re-visiting ban decision
At Tenmei banned for one year, you support a harsh sanction.

Please consider a less severe remedy in light of a wider contribution history which may have been overlooked -- see
 * User talk:Roger Davies#Thank you for writing something good
 * User:Newyorkbrad#Thank you for writing something good
 * GA, 2010 G-20 Toronto summit

In 2009, Roger Davies observed,
 * "I believe that Tenmei was trying to create an appropriate backdrop for later helpful and meaningful discussions ...."

The Senkaku issues were not simple; but there you have it.

Even this diff does not alter your judgment in this instance, I hope it will influence your thinking in other cases which arise in the future? --Tenmei (talk) 03:56, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please help us on page about Ukrainians: anonimus user is deleting all important data - clear act of vandalism for sime time, war editing. Thanks!--SeikoEn (talk) 05:49, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Deletion review for Articles for deletion/History of All My Children
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Articles for deletion/History of All My Children. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --Gh87 (talk) 05:51, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Perhaps you could take a second look?
I've added some information to Sockpuppet investigations/Meghan.reilly. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:32, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion Request
Hi. You deleted a user page of mine, User:j.nesta/sb. I had a bunch of info on there; is there any way you can undelete it for a few hours so I can get the information back before it is gone forever? Thanks. --J.nesta (talk) 17:56, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries the data will not be gone forever, just suppressed from view. Just to make sure it is only you receiving a copy of it, kindly send an email here and stating this request. Thanks. - Mailer Diablo 18:25, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Deleted pages that may now be allowable
I previously created pages around my books for the Shaytonian Chronicles. At the time, they were self published and therefore outside the rules ( though personally, I do not see why a book should be disallowed for that reason) Still, they are now published by Writer's Exchange in both ebook & hardcopy formats and so should be acceptable.How do I go about getting them reinstated? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shaytonian_Chronicles

Thanks Karen Fainges Kfainges (talk) 19:10, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I've posted a response on her talk page about reinstating the articles and editing with a COI. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:13, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

PROD
Greetings. We suggest that articles in PROD be labeled with information on the quoted reason for deletion. The article inTRust is an example where the only data available states that you marked the article, waited for seven days and then eliminated it. This is insufficient. Wikiborg4711 (talk) 10:31, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Article on The World Solution for World Problems
I already tried to launch an article on the book The World Solution for World Problems which has an ISBN number and is officially published as an electronic book by PiCarta and you prevented publication. Now I have discovered, that there exist many articles on books on Wikipedia, for example, the book Where Troy Once Stood, which is even controversial. Would you mind to publish my article, which in my opinion is very imporatnt for the survival of mankind?

ArbCom Elections 2011
Time flies and its two years. I shall not be seeking a new term; Will be returning to writing articles on Wikipedia, what I've always loved to do.

Upon completion of my term I will continue to help out with my Oversight and Checkuser privileges, in particular if backlogs show up. And perhaps an extra hand if there is anything that calls for my experience.

As for the hottest election issue this year, the illegal arbcom-l leaks, I have this to say. As what I have promised back in my candidacy two years back, I am not embarrassed by any of my emails, thought processes, etc to the list. But what made me felt utterly helpless and disappointed was when I saw names and other personal identifiable information of editors being thrown up on WR ala Wikileaks and not bothered to be redacted.

There are positive changes in the works coming slowly but surely, I believe my fellow colleagues and prospective arbitrators would continue the excellent work beyond this year. - Mailer Diablo 14:13, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Deleted Post
Hello,

I am not sure why the wikipedia page for Meghan Chavalier cannot be created and has been deleted on numerous occasions. She is an actress, author, singer and activist. Is it because she was in adult films? Because I've seen Jenna Jameson's page and she's no more relevant the next adult film star. She is a published author, singer with 3 cds readily available on any music website like Itunes and Amazon. She is an activist for the LGBT Community and she just happens to have starred in over 200 adult films. She is a legend in the transgender community and your constant deletion of her page shows me either one of two things you're a homophobe or you just have no idea who she is. Do you ever actually Google people when their pages are uploaded or do you listen to the random rants of homophobes who don't want people within the LGBT Community to get credit where credit is due? Acting as if one person is more important than another is one of the reasons I would never donate money to Wikipedia. That being said, I think you should undelete this page and give her the proper credit she deserves for all of the work she has done in her life. I find random articles about people on this website who haven't done 1/4 of the things she has done in the entertainment industry.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monkeyburger (talk • contribs) 16:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia is controlled by rude people and bullies? If they can't explain their reasoning, they just ban?
I am neutral. I saw some genuine improvements that were possible in the Barack Obama article.

It seems that the article is guarded and heavily controlled by some thugs. They will make up fake excuses to get their way. I calmly made some suggestions. They just removed them without any discussion. "For Pete's Sake" was a typical edit summary.

When they found out that they don't have the mental capacity to rationally discuss why my edits are good and they have no ideas, they just ban me saying I am a sock. Their excuse is that everyone they don't like must be related to one another.

My suggestions was that some law call SCIP is not very important but that there were other things very important to Obama. I also said that we should stick with Obama and be careful not to just have a summary of the world or politics while he was in office. Similarly, I suggested that the paragraph about Libya be written about Obama's involvement, not just a history lesson about UN resolution this or that.

You can see that my suggestions are all good. Yet when they are unable to even explain their reasoning, they just resort to banning. I think that maybe they want to anger people hoping that the hurt party will start to vandalize. If so, that is a very sneaky way to damage Wikipedia (piss off people hoping a few percentage will vandalize).

Once again, look at my Barack Obama edits. Looks at them objectively. You will see that everything I wrote is of very high quality. I should be immediately unbanned. My username is Jack Paterno (I don't like that name and asked to have it changed so don't use that as an excuse)) Jack Patern (talk) 23:40, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thank you! - Mailer Diablo 14:11, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Abortion case Remedy 1
Hi Mailer diablo. May I ask if you intended to abstain on Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abortion/Proposed decision? Your vote reads more like an oppose to me. Best, <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk ) 22:47, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Just went through it one more round and updated my votes. - Mailer Diablo 13:23, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you! :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 06:39, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Bidsar
Good catch! :) I missed that one! - A l is o n  ❤ 06:45, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Hehe, no worries. Have a good day! - Mailer Diablo 06:47, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

RFA thanks
Thank you for your support at my recent successful RFA. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. Best,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:05, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Reconsider LabX?
Can we reconsider the reinstatement for the LabX page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/LabX, and maybe changing it to "LabX Media Group". I have posted more details and references to recent changes on the Articles_for_deletion/LabX discussion page. 216.208.153.97 (talk) 18:23, 16 December 2011 (UTC)kp

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Royal Brunei Airlines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royal Brunei (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you
Hi this is MegaVergan and I just want to thank you for unblocking me. Is there anything I could possibly do for you? MegaVergan (talk) 10:56, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Request for Comments on Representation
Hi there! My name is Whenaxis, I noticed that you are on the Arbitration Committee. I created a policy proposal called Representation. I think that this policy would help the Arbitration Committee as well as the Mediation Committee because the goal of this proposed policy is to decrease the amount of time wasted when an unfamiliar editor files a Arbitration or Mediation Committee when other forms of Dispute Resolution have not yet been sought. For example, an editor may come to the Arbitration Committee requesting formal mediation when other dispute resolution areas have not been utilised such as third opinions or request for comments. A representative works much like a legal aid - there to help you for free and:


 * File a formal mediation case or an arbitration case on your behalf
 * Make statements and submit evidence at the case page on your behalf
 * Guide you through the expansive and sometimes complex policies and procedures of Wikipedia

This proposed idea can also help the editor seeking help because it can alleviate the stress and anxiety from dispute resolution because mediation and arbitration can be intimidating for those who are unfamiliar.

I would highly appreciate your comments on this proposal at: Wikipedia talk:Representation. Cheers and Happy New Year -  Whenaxis  about talk contribs 22:46, 31 December 2011 (UTC)