User talk:Mailer diablo/Archive L

Admin coaching
Hi! While User:Titoxd is on a Wikibreak, he gave me permission to do some leg-work concerning Esperanza admin coaching. I was curious how your coaching with User:Aaron is going. If it is finished (or even if it isn't), would you be able to take on another coachee? Don't feel guilty if you don't have the time- I perfectly understand, and wouldn't want anyone feel overworked. Thanks for all your time! E WS23 | (Leave me a message!) 04:35, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your response. I have assigned User:Tdxiang as your coachee. Thanks for all your support of the admin coaching program, and let me know if you have any questions. E WS23 | (Leave me a message!) 05:45, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

User:Monicasdude
As Monicasdude doesn't appear to be taking much from the two RFCs against him, I have opened a Request for Arbitration. Feel free to make a statement at Requests for arbitration.

You were contacted because you endorsed a previous RFC against Monicasdude, please accept my sincere apologies if this message is not of interest to you and feel free to blank it. Stifle 15:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion.

P.P.S. Also, sorry about the delay. It appears that the auto-posting for SuggestBot is unhappy when it tries to edit your page. -- ForteTuba 21:12, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

thanks for the support
Hi Mailer Diablo- thanks a lot for your support on my recent, (barely) successful rfa. Please feel free to leave me any comments or criticisms on my talk page! --He:ah? 22:23, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Kusma's RfA
Hello, Mailer diablo! Thank you for your support in my recent successful request for adminship. If you ever have problems that you could use my assistance with or see me doing stupid things with my new buttons, don't hesitate to contact me. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 02:28, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VeryCD
Why did you close Articles for deletion/VeryCD? 2 deletes and 3 keeps is hardly a consensus, is it? chowells 13:43, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Evan Lee Dahl article
Hello Mr. Diablo,

I wrote an article on actor Evan Lee Dahl that was deleted because of lack of notability, vanity, or just plain not a known actor. He has since won 2 awards. The 2006 Young Artist Award and the 2006 MethodFest award. I tried to add a new article today stating the he is an award winning actor. It was not only deleted again, but placed into the category of Protected deleted pages. I am new to this and am asking for your help.

Thank you for your time, Just Me 01:34, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Albert Baumann
Hi Mailer diablo. I see you closed the Albert Baumann deletion discussion. The nominator also placed AfD tags pointing to that debate on about half of the other shooters in the category Category:Shooters at the 1896 Summer Olympics. Can you take care of those too? Thanks. -- Jonel | Speak 23:02, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

A KISS Rfa Thanks
Thank you, I've been promoted. psch e  mp  |  talk  01:16, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
Hi, this is Matt Yeager. I wanted to thank you for your vote on my request for adminship. The count was something like was 14/20/5 when I decided to withdraw the request. My decision was based on the fact that there are enough things wasting people's time on the Internet that doomed RFA's shouldn't be kept up for voters to have to think about. Regardless of the rationale behind your vote, I hope you will read this note for an extended note and discussion on what will happen before I make another try at adminship (I didn't want to clog up your userpage with drivel that you might not be interested in reading). Thank you very, very much for your vote and your time and consideration of my credentials--regardless of whether you voted support, nuetral, or oppose. Happy editing! Matt Yeager ♫ ( Talk? ) 01:56, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof
Thanks for your interest in VandalProof! You've been added to the list of authorized users, and feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page if you have any questions. - Gl e n T C 18:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Monicasdude
Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Requests for arbitration/Monicasdude. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Monicasdude/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Monicasdude/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Johnleemk | Talk 00:50, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Many thanks for your support on my recent RfA. It was successful. Thanks again, Mark83 10:53, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for supporting me in my RfA. I really didn't think people appreciate my work here that much, but it's nice to see you do: my Request was closed with 66 supports and 4 opposes. I'll do my best not to turn your confidence down. If in any point in the future you get the feeling I'm doing something wrong, do not hesitate to drop me a line. --Dijxtra 11:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof 1.1 is Now Available For Download
Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new Rollback All Contributions feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some "vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs and I will do my best to help you. Thanks. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:47, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

About editing 'Lord Sarabheswara'
Hello Hettar:

My user ID in wikipedia.org is Subravenkat, and I have recently started creating/editing pages in Wikipedia.org.

I have created an item titled Lord Sarabhesvara, which I notice you had redirected to the article on Lord Shiva. I do appreciate your intention to help, but request you not to redirect it to the 'Lord Shiva' article because the article on Lord Shiva has no mention whatsoever of His assuming the form of a Sharaba.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Subravenkat. Subravenkat 20:05, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Re: VP log-in
Did you try clicking the "Try logging into Wikipedia" link within the log-in request failure message? It's possible that the cookies aren't getting stored properly when you simply sign into IE. Also, make sure that you're using the monobook skin. AmiDaniel (Talk) 04:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Aha, I think I may have found the problem. Try it again. AmiDaniel (Talk) 05:03, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Afd Cool (African philosophy)
Just a brief thank you for your work on this contentious Afd. Please note that I felt compelled to slightly alter the record after you shut down the page. I only just now noticed that when the page was undergoing constant reordering by two or three people (presumably, in an attempt to make it more intelligible/coherent), someone deleted my boldface notation that I had changed my vote and then also placed my original comments supporting merging the two articles under my "keep" vote. Because the information as reordered -- and particularly without the subhead -- was really confusing, I simply did a strike-through of my earlier language. That way, the language is preserved, but it is clear that it was no longer current for much of the discussion. Deeceevoice 09:20, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

I see that someone already has reverted my strikeover. Because the changes to my post by those wishing to make the discussion more coherent have succeeded in only muddying my position on the matter, I would appreciate it if you would reinstate my change -- so that the record is clear for those reviewing the discussion. Perhaps if you make that change, it will stand. Thanks. Deeceevoice 11:06, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. "...but please avoid having to modify a closed AfD yourself in future." Well, of course -- but one doesn't ordinarily expect one's comments to be moved around or deleted. Given my schedule, it was all I could do to try to keep up with all the garbage being slung in my direction. Peace. Deeceevoice 20:16, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Sexuality of Adolf Hitler
FYI...This article is up for vote on AFD. OSU80 01:21, 18 April 2006 (UTC)


 * You closed the vote at no consensus, what delete arguments were not accounted for with comments? I remember much less consensus on keep closures in the past. Ans  e  ll  12:32, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Ric Romero comment
Hi, I'd be interested to find out whether you thought my comment at the start of the Ric Romero AfD was justified, unjustified and/or patronising to the admins.

The comment was removed here. I think it was pretty obvious that the Fark influence *did* have a biasing influence on the discussion, and since when was blatant comment removal (as opposed to moving it) not vandalism?

Maybe I'm making too much of a big deal of this, but if it was just a silly comment, why so many attempts to remove it?

Please let me know what you think, thanks.

Fourohfour 19:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Further reply : User_talk:Fourohfour

Alexandria Potomac Little League
FYI, Articles for deletion/Alexandria Potomac Little League was closed as "delete", but the article is still in place. Cheers! -AED 07:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

AfD of Power Rangers: Thunder Strike
Hello, I noticed that you closed the AfD of Power Rangers: Thunder Strike. Could you also delete Power rangers: Thunder Strike (note the case difference), since that was listed in the same nomination (and contains basically the same content as the other article)? Thanks. — TKD::Talk 04:20, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9-11: The Road to Tyranny (2nd nomination)
Are you open for discussion on how you've closed this? - brenneman {L}  09:12, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9-11: The Road to Tyranny (2nd nomination)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cool (African philosophy)
FYI, this is being discussed at deletion review. Calling it no consensus wasn't unreasonable, but wasn't (IMO) the best answer, either. Thought you might want to pop in over there and comment. Friday (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of shock sites (fourth nomination)
Hi. I am posting this in regards to Articles for deletion/List of shock sites (fourth nomination). I am just wondering, if you are open to comment on this, why you marked this as no concensus when the vote count was nearly 2-1 (from my cursory ctrl + f search) in favor of keep? Thanks. Hobbeslover 00:49, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for the response. I knew that it was keep by default, but I think the no concensus is giving fuel for the deletion forces in the edit war that's currently happening in the article. A clear up or down vote would have been better; however, I didn't know about the 3-1 being a concensus. If that is the case, then I guess my concerns are moot. Thanks for the explanation :\ Hobbeslover 01:32, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

That stress meter.....
.....Is about as high as mine is in real life. Thanks for keeping the crap out and the good in. brainybassist 02:03, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Hey, sorry to hear about the stress you're under. I guess I can't help you with the real life stuff, but I do wish you all the best. And remember: this too shall pass... --Joann e B 08:57, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh man, I completely understand finals stress. I'm really supposed to be doing some writing now, actually, but instead I thought I'd gripe about it with a fellow Wikipedian. Just think, a couple more weeks and everything will be over, and then we can all start collecting an unemployment check while applying for a job at McDonald's. That's my plan, at least.

Hope you feel better, physically and stress-wise. Drop me a line if you feel like dumping any academic grievances. Ah, and in case I forget to mention it later, the AfD graphic on your user page is brilliant. ''' Tijuana Brass ¡Épa! - E@''' 10:20, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Ack! November? No wonder you're feeling pressure. I actually have more in common with what you're describing than I've let on (long term grade struggles despite hard effort, for example), so I can sympathize with your situation. Ah, and the unemployment check part was a joke; I have a job. At any rate, sounds like you've got quite a bit on your plate. I hope you've had time in between all that work to take it easy and be away from some of the demands and expectations which have been biting at your heels — I won't presume to offer advice concerning such a signficant subject to another Wikipedian whom I don't know outside of talk pages, so perhaps the best I can offer you is my sympathies and a prayer for your wellbeing during the next several months. Again, if there's anything I can do here to help you out, don't hesitate to drop it on me. If nothing else, I'm always around to hear complaints!  Tijuana Brass ¡Épa! - E@ 11:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Heh, what's important is that it wasn't a good joke. Of course, some people would say receiving a check for doing nothing is a joke in and of itself. At any rate, if you think to, let me know how things come along... otherwise, I'll just start bugging you about it when I get curious. Cheers.  Tijuana Brass ¡Épa! - E@ 11:15, 22 April 2006 (UTC)



please revisit an MfD you closed - I have relisted it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User_talk:86.10.231.219#.5B.5BUser_talk:86.10.231.219.5D.5D Thanks in advance. Midgley 10:56, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. (It wasn't criticisim, just needs another look now. )Midgley 11:01, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Mad -Studios....unfair deletion
It is apparent that you and other "admins" have deleted my article titled "Mad-Studios"...I would like a reason for the deletion...is it possible to have the article undeleted or something? I did not write the article to offend any persons or parties...So I want an explanation for this... King_Mnky

South Dakota abortion law controversy
All righty then, would YOU be so kind as to close the AfD process on that page? In about fifteen hours, barring objections, I'm going to move South Dakota reproductive rights controversy to South Dakota H.B. 1215 Controversy, and South Dakota abortion law controversy needs to be deleted and redirected to South Dakota H.B. 1215 Controversy. Struct 08:32, 23 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry, Struct. Deletion policy states "Once a page is listed for deletion by listing on one of the different pages, the nomination is kept open for a period of time to allow for community comment." An AfD needs to stay active for 5 days, accordingly. I'm not a regular participant in AfD and not sure when it's appropriate to bend this rule. Try User: Mailer diablo. -- PFHLai 08:49, 23 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Mailer diablo, according to the deletion logs, you are working on AfD right now. Can you help, please ? -- PFHLai 08:49, 23 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm a relative newcomer, and I'm really trying to give the WM process a chance. I don't want to do anything improper.  There seems to be a clear consensus for deletion and redirection, but if that's not sufficient, I have no problem with leaving that page up for a few more days.  I'm just trying to tidy everything up before tomorrow's move of SD:RRC. Struct 08:55, 23 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you, Mailer Diablo, for your swift response. -- PFHLai 09:03, 23 April 2006 (UTC)


 * A compromise consensus has been reached to move South Dakota reproductive rights controversy to South Dakota H.B. 1215 controversy. I was going to wait, but I think it's safe to make that change.  And I thank you for your prompt response as well.  Struct 09:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Old Skool Esperanzial note
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Cel es tianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Deletion
I noticed you had closed Articles_for_deletion/Political_Abrogationism with the decision delete However the article is back Political Abrogationism. It looks one of the sections simply copied back in. What is supposed to be done if this happens? -- Dark fred Talk to me 21:30, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Log/2006 April 17
I dunno why you delisted that date as closed mate, it has over 60 debates still open! :P No reply needed, just a gentle heads up :) --kingboyk 05:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Deleted accounts and comments
Hi, I'd like to ask you about something that's been bothering me. A user by the name of Brian G. Crawford has apparently had one of his older accounts (BrianGCrawfordMA) deleted completely.

Thing is, this person claimed that he was leaving Wikipedia, and as far as I can tell, the old account (already in disuse) was removed completely at that stage. The history of the user page of the *current* account prior to then has also been erased.

I find it very disturbing that this user has made some controversial comments (including some on the user page of his old account which may colour opinions of his current actions) that are no longer "on the system" as far as ordinary users are concerned.

I can (at a stretch) understand that there may be circumstances under which a particularly unhappy user may wish to leave Wikipedia and/or have certain or all comments erased. What I am unhappy with is that after leaving (posting a self-pitying "R.I.P" user box on his user page), he came back, and is now editing as normal; but with the benefit of much of his history being wiped.

Any thoughts?

Fourohfour 20:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

AfD Historical comparison of economy cars 2006
Just FYI, someone later set up a separate AfD nomination for Historical comparison of economy cars 2006 which is apparently still open. &mdash; AKADriver &#x260E; 22:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for voting on my RfA
--M e ts501talk &bull; contribs 01:49, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Modern Gnosticism
Hi. You deleted the Modern Gnosticism article as a result of a deletion debate - thanks. It has since been reinstantiated by its original author, User:Ndru01. I'm not sure what the correct procedure from here is, so I'm reporting it to you. Could you delete it again, and perhaps block Ndru01 from re-instantiating it? His next attempt, if he can't do that, will probably be to instantiate an article called Modern Mysticism... Thanks, Fuzzypeg 01:56, 27 April 2006 (UTC).

rfa thanks
Thanks for the support on my RFA. Unfortunately, it did not achieve consensus. I look forward to your support in a couple months when I apply again. Holler at me if you need anything. &rArr;  SWAT  Jester    Ready    Aim    Fire!  01:10, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Re the whole de-bureaucrating thing
Hi, I never came to thank you for the message you left for me a month ago when I stepped down from being a bureaucrat. Thank you for the things you said, it's good to know there are still plenty of good people about in this project. I do not see myself standing for bureaucrat again anytime soon though who knows what the future may bring! Thank you once again. -- Fr a ncs2000 09:50, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Articles revive
Hello! Can you revive these articles? these articles was very useful.


 * Eichhorn
 * Pringsheim
 * Heinemann


 * --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך 10:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

thanks
hey, thanks for the userboxes!

Deletion notices on your page

 * Hi there! Thought I'd let you know about this edit: . See you around! --HappyCamper 14:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Since Happycamper felt that I need to explain myself. I think its appropriate I do so here. As an purposely an experience admin you should set yourself above the ordinary user. Posting your Hanko and a blog pics is an abuse of userpages:


 * "Anything that is compatible with the Wikipedia project. It's a mistake to think of it as a homepage: Wikipedia is not a free host, blog, or webspace provider. Instead, think of it as a way of organizing the work that you will be doing on the articles in Wikipedia, and also a way of helping other editors to understand with whom they're working."


 * Also, you might want to read this. I think its a BLATENT misuse of your administration @ower and was wondering if you can tell me how to start impeachment proceedings. Clean up your userpages! H0riz0n 22:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Saints Wikiproject
I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints.

I also invite you to join the discussion on prayers and infoboxes here: Prayers_are_NPOV.

Thanks! --evrik 14:23, 2 May 2006 (UTC)