User talk:Maisiecakes

I've noted your use of the "hangon" tag and your associated argument, as follows: "I do not agree with the deletion of this article as, admittedly it does need some technical maintenance, but that does not detract from the fact that it is truthful and useful to the public, which is afterall what wikipedia is and needs to continue to be. Maisiecakes 23:59, 12 November 2007 (UTC)" I thought I'd take a moment to explain that "truthful and useful to the public" are not the relevant criteria -- indeed, this is not "what wikipedia is and needs to continue to be". Wikipedia is about topics that are notable; articles about notable topics need to both assert and demonstrate notability, and that notability must be verifiable. If you'd like to recreate the page, I would recommend finding verifiable sources that demonstrate the notability of your topic, such as articles in newspapers and magazines, etc. If I can be of any further assistance, you can leave a note on my talk page. Accounting4Taste 01:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)