User talk:Majash2020/Archive 5

Melbourne meetup
Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:47, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:00, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * David Fincher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Blue Ribbon Award


 * Steven Spielberg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Blue Ribbon Award

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:09, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Andrew James Allen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to The Unknown and Olivia


 * Caroline Aaron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Happy Endings and Players (TV series)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * John Abbott (actor, born 1905) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Crusader, Thriller (TV series), Adventure Island, Once Upon a Time, Crosswinds, Studio One, The Islanders, Anna and the King of Siam, Thunder in the East and Adventures in Paradise


 * Grant Dodwell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Cass, Medivac, Homicide (TV series), Fallen Angels, Water Rats, Cops and Robbers and Dear Diary


 * Martin Sacks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to All the Way, Encounters, Thirtysomething, Underbelly, Lowdown and The Cup


 * Logie Award (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Ray Martin, Mike Walsh, Brian Henderson and Pat McDonald


 * Aldercourt Primary School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Victoria


 * Peta Doodson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to The Bank

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:27, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joshua Feldman


A tag has been placed on Joshua Feldman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JoelWhy (talk) 13:59, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Joshua Feldman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joshua Feldman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joshua Feldman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JoelWhy (talk) 16:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kyle Agnew


The article Kyle Agnew has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet notability guidelines for WP:NACTOR.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tchaliburton (talk) 04:19, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kyle Agnew


A tag has been placed on Kyle Agnew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tchaliburton (talk) 05:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Ryan Wynott
I saw your note on Ryan Wynott.

While he was deleted per discussion, the article can be recreated if the person eventually meets guidelines for inclusion. For example, a football playing amateur ball does not meet the guidelines and would be deleted. If the footballer plays professional a few years later, then the creation of an article would be warranted.

In Wnott's case, I he has played in 30+ TV episodes since the last deletion discussion. At first glance, this would appear to satisfy the guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 06:27, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks --Mjs1991 (talk) 06:32, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Patient J


The article Patient J has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet WP:MOVIE.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tchaliburton (talk) 11:39, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I hope you participate in the discussion on deleting this article that you authored. While I agree that the subject isn't notable enough and voted to delete the article, the producer is notable and most of what you wrote can/should be included in an article on him and his productions.  Your work on this film can be merged with and included in the aricle on City of Scars or perhaps that article can be rewritten as an article on the trilogy.  The discussion on deleting your article includes:


 * Redirect and partial Merge to a created section at City of Scars covering the filmmaker's background and earlier work. While Film Threat is fine as a source for Patient J, Cinema Crazed and Comic Book Bin have yet to be evaluated as RS in context to what is being sourced. To disagree with the nominator, filmmaker Aaron Schoenke (a redlink simply awaiting an article) may indeed be determinable under WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE as notable enough for these pages, and he has (so far) a trilogy of these Batman fan films out... Patient J (2005), Batman Legends (2006), and City of Scars (2010), in all of which actor Paul Molnar (another redlink awaiting an article) plays the Joker.  While we do not have a great many sources speaking about the 2005 film, the series and filmmaker are not unsourcable, and can be written of contextually somewhere within these pages.   Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I think a merger is a suitable solution here, although I'd lean toward suggesting Aaron Schoenke himself as the most likely notable topic, into which material about all of his films (and about him) from the available reviews and interviews could be merged. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:30, 28 April 2012


 * I know that's a lot of work for an editor but I think it's the best way to go. Take care, DocTree (talk) 21:32, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kevin Porter (actor)


The article Kevin Porter (actor) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet WP:ACTOR.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tchaliburton (talk) 11:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kurt Carley


The article Kurt Carley has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet WP:ACTOR, as he has not had significant roles or coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. West Eddy (talk) 11:49, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alejandro Felipe


The article Alejandro Felipe has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet WP:ACTOR, as he has not had significant roles or coverage.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. West Eddy (talk) 11:53, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Griffin Gluck


The article Griffin Gluck has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet WP:ACTOR. No indication that this actor has held significant roles.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. West Eddy (talk) 11:55, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 28th Saturn Awards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Richard Taylor, Richard Kelly, Panic (film), Memento and Chris Columbus


 * Jackson Pace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Ace in the Hole and The Gray Man


 * Dawson Dunbar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Out of Order


 * Tony Aboyantz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to La Ronde

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kevin Porter (actor), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. West Eddy (talk) 15:49, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Patient J for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patient J is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Patient J (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tchaliburton (talk) 16:27, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Kevin Porter (actor) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Porter (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kevin Porter (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 00:45, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Griffin Gluck for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Griffin Gluck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Griffin Gluck until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 02:15, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kurt Carley


A tag has been placed on Kurt Carley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. West Eddy (talk) 02:31, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kurt Carley


The article Kurt Carley has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Drmies (talk) 04:00, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Alejandro Felipe for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alejandro Felipe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alejandro Felipe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 01:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

WP:NOTBROKEN
Per the policy above, WP:NOTBROKEN, please do not change redirects that are working and send the user to other redirects simply because there are more redkirects which are more direct. In otherwords, do not change TCM.com to Turner Classic Movies, when a redirect to TCM.com does the appropropriate task of redirecting the editor to the proper place. In other words, dont' fix a redirect if it ain't a;ready broken. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:08, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

I apologise for that.--Mjs1991 (talk) 07:11, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:17, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Kurt Carley for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kurt Carley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kurt Carley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 01:52, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jackson Pace


The article Jackson Pace has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  IShadowed  ✰  16:33, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Translating Moss Jernverk
Hi, I am working on translating the article about Moss Jernverk and I do not see the point in adding a template for that, no one else but me will do that job and I do it as quick as I can. Ulflarsen (talk) 11:33, 20 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I have now finished translating the article (have left notes which I have started to translate) and as I am not a native speaker of English I am happy to receive any help I can get in correcting mistakes. Ulflarsen (talk) 10:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

AfD for Hehe language
I have a concern about your proposed deletion of the article Hehe language. In the future, please try to follow the guidelines at WP:Before when making a deletion request. A simple google search for "Hehe language" would have shown references from the department of African languages at Michigan State University, Wolfram Alpha, Ethnologue, the Library of Congress, Linguist list, the University of Cambridge, Amazon, Britannica, and Webster's Dictionary; and that's just on the first page. As a general rule, if you think the article name might be a prank, and it is describing a native or foreign topic, it's a good idea to at least do a cursory search instead of going with your gut, as there are many onomatopoeic and nonce-sounding terms derived from non-European languages. Much thanks, VanIsaacWScontribs 21:39, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:29, 24 May 2012 (UTC)