User talk:Majash2020/Archive 98

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Lines of Color
Hello Mjs1991. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lines of Color, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: reviews on notable websites and being nominated for a Grammy indicates significance even if the artist has no article. Thank you. So Why  08:18, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Sources on articles you make
Hi. Thanks for making quite a number of album articles recently, however I just want to suggest several things. As with Stunning Luxury, which is only one example amongst what I'm sure are a number more, but if the only sources available on an album are Metacritic and AllMusic, you might want to think more about making the article. These are not news publications—Metacritic collates reviews but doesn't say something's notable in and of itself, and AllMusic reviews most everything and it's a database, not a publication. Might I suggest slowing down just a bit and working on individual articles a bit more than just the bare minimum two or so sources, with more besides a track listing, an infobox and a review box? Otherwise, with all due respect, it would appear that you're just trying to make as many as you can in the shortest amount of time possible and I don't think that helps anybody, including yourself. Other editors might be wanting to make these articles, and may probably do more than you have on them. Thanks.  Ss  112   04:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * And several other things:

Thanks.  Ss  112   04:51, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Please be mindful of the date format used on English/British/most non-American artists' articles; this should be dmy;
 * If you are copypasting the durations of the tracks on these albums from somewhere, please avoid doing so and type it out yourself because I've noticed a lot of weird blank spacing next to your durations like it's been copied from somewhere;
 * Most publications should have website= or work= in their references, instead of publisher=;
 * Maybe this was an error on your part, but references go after punctuation;
 * We don't need "Ltd" or the like in record label names.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:41, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

More accurate edit summaries
Thank you for adding to an article I created here, but the edit summary "fixes" is not accurate to what you did. You added reviews and durations, that's not a fix". It's more helpful to describe in slightly more detail what you have done. Also, I understand the process was probably automatic, but I was not the editor you should have notified about an article of mine that I didn't even know had been moved to draftspace, Fool (Joe Jackson album), being approved and moved back to article space. That should have been sent to the editor who actually first added content to the page, which was .  Ss  112   09:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Also, sorry for all the messages lately, but another thing I've noticed: please don't mark contributions of large amounts of data to articles, especially page creations, as minor edits. In no way are these minor. Adding a whole ratings table to an album is similarly not a minor edit. Like the more accurate edit summaries I spoke about above, it can be misleading to other users.  Ss  112   17:44, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

That's fine, the messages are helpful. In regards to marking contributions as minor edits, can you show me an example of one of those, as I wasn't aware that I was doing that. Thanks --Mjs1991 (talk) 22:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I just actually noticed the minor edits in my contributions. I don't understand how that's happening as I haven't been marking it, but I'll make sure it doesn't continue.--Mjs1991 (talk) 23:01, 22 March 2019 (UTC)