User talk:Majestic2007

Speedy deletion of Tyrannical Response Team
A tag has been placed on Tyrannical Response Team requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ridernyc (talk) 18:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
To clear a few things up. I am a volunteer here, meaning I am here of my own free will and accord. I also have been an admin for a year now, and as such very regularly am involved in speedy deletions. I kindly ask that in the future if you have issues with my actions, please contact me directly first either via email or on my user talk page. That being said, I independantly review every article that I delete outside of the editor who added the speedy deletion tag. In the case of your article, I agreed with the speedy deletion tag and that is why your article was deleted. Your article had no references to reliable third party sources to assert notability. These are both important parts of articles. Links to your own website or some fringe theory or small personal website generally do not count as reliable sources. As well, your article was not written from a neutral point of view because you have an apparent conflict of interest in the subject. These are also frowned upon when writing a wiki article. I am unaware of any attempts you have made to contact me so comments claiming that I am standoffish is unfounded. If you have any questions about my actions or any other questions about wikipedia, please feel free to contact me and I will gladly attempt to help you. Hope this helps! Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:29, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BEETRT1.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:BEETRT1.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)