User talk:Majorly

Mindblowing
I can't believe it's been over three years since you last edited. Seems like yesterday your name was everywhere.

And after all this time, despite my own personal qualms over some of the things you've said, I still miss seeing you around.

It's ultimately your choice whether or not to return (perhaps you're already back, editing under a different username), but regardless of the circumstances behind your apparent departure, just know that you'll always be welcome here should you ever come back. Kurtis (talk) 05:20, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * It is unbelievable. I can't believe how much of my life I spent on here - it's pretty sad actually. I sort of wish I could say I also miss it, but I don't at all. I don't even think about it. Even when I'm browsing for information, I don't think about the time I used make thousands of edits here every month. So, I won't be coming back, ever. Not under this name or another name. I'm no longer interested, and I'm not part of it anymore. I've written a more detailed explanation on my userpage. I'm amazed 261 people still watch it.  Majorly  talk  14:36, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Majorly ... I too remember your username from the past. This month I almost stopped editing (after more than 5 years) and I have noticed that I don't miss this place with all that hypertrophied hysteria and inadequate importance thrown into unimportant conflicts and into unreal online universe .. I still like the place as it learned me a lot, but I'm more and more convinced that spending evenings in the garden and talking with my beloved is somewhat more and more ... satisfying. I wish you all the best. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 15:28, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for posting this, Alex. – Steel 09:56, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * That's great to hear. Good luck with all of your future endeavours. :-) Kurtis (talk) 05:28, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

No idea if you ever monitor this but...
I stumbled across this old thing I once wrote, which was dedicated to you. Your old achievements remain a part of the good bits of this place, never mind how you later came to feel about it. Thanks for your contributions. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:17, 11 July 2016 (UTC) (Here's the diff for when I notified you --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:20, 11 July 2016 (UTC))

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
What Dweller says ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

... and again today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you today for Cheadle Hulme! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Coosa Valley Academy
Hello Majorly, I created text for CVA. You advocated deletion of this article. Would you please restore it to my use so I can see if my work will meet your standard. Many thanks. Rhadow (talk) 01:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Cheadle Hulme
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for February 5, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/February 5, 2021. Congratulations on your work! On behalf of Ealdgyth,—Wehwalt (talk) 01:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2528 of Precious, a prize of QAI, aka the cabal of the outcast. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

A goat for you!
Thanks for being around.

jp×g 09:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC) 

Proposed deletion of Festival Park Iowa


The article Festival Park Iowa has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "website gone, name no longer being used, property sold to Polk County Iowa government https://www.polkcountyiowa.gov/conservation/news-and-announcements/sleepy-hollow-sports-park-to-join-polk-county-conservation-s-family-of-parks/"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Mitch Johnson (announcer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitch Johnson (announcer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mitch Johnson (announcer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Flip Format (talk) 16:12, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/delist/Shakespeare
Hey, I have proposed a replacement for the File:Shakespeare.jpg you nominated for FP. Drop by the discussion if you can. Thanks. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for York
York has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:02, 19 July 2024 (UTC)