User talk:Majorly/Archives/44

My RFA
Thanks for the support.--Kumioko (talk) 17:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Hiya
I've started editing on here quite a bit more now, so hope to see you around here :) Razorflame 20:35, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.
Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 08:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Dedication to Wikipedia - Meet-ups
Thank you for coming such a long way to meet with us. I'm not sure how much further you came than me (Bedhampton) but I did combine it with other things. You should be awarded the Wikipedian equivalent of Mentioned in Despatches Bashereyre (talk) 10:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah good to meet you Majorly. That is dedication! If you fancy another trek down south! : Meetup/London 9 Sunday Lunctime again. May 11th! -- Harry Wood (talk) 15:41, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

WikipediaWeekly Episode 45
Hello again! Just a note that WikipediaWeekly Episode 45 has been released. Listen and comment at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/04/14/wikipedia-weekly-45-blps-revisited/. Cheers,  W ODU P  20:32, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you no longer wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from that list.

Too many edits?
Do you remember which RfA had that opposition? That is really disturbing.  Horologium  (talk) 22:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * This and this are just two I can think of. While the opposes aren't exactly "makes too many edits", the general gist of some of the opposers suggest they think the user edits too much.  Majorly  (talk) 22:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Editprotected
Sorry; you protected the page while I was editing it, and I never got a warning. &mdash; Coren (talk) 23:26, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I never noticed. It may be best to revert your additions. Either way, it doesn't bother me.  Majorly  (talk) 23:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I've editprotected to finish it, which may be the best thing (include both version) until the dust settles. &mdash; Coren (talk) 23:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia administrators
Shouldn't you be in that category? ;)  Enigma  message Review 23:28, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * No, I don't agree with user categories.  Majorly  (talk) 23:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Bummer. I bring it up because I recently advised someone who asked whether I was an admin that they can simply check the categories. Seems simpler than going to the admin list and searching for names.  Enigma  message Review 23:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

RfA Reform?
Discussion from the Admin Poll and the RfA talk leads me to believe that a proposal needs to be made concerning a simple step by step method for granting admin tools to trusted and experienced users. I brought up the idea of creating the proposal on RfA talk, but I was wondering if you were interested in creating the proposal..? SynergeticMaggot (talk) 07:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree that it needs some reform, I still also think that as part of that reform we should consider modularizing some of the other tools as well like we did with rollback.--Kumioko (talk) 17:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks like my comment got your goat. Didn't wish to inflame the situation.  Apologies if I irked you.  The Rambling Man (talk) 17:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * (ec) Well you two can create a page/proposal etc and I'll support it. But I'm not interested in creating it, because people will just oppose it again.  Majorly  (talk) 17:12, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Email
Regarding certain accusations of sockpuppetry that are frankly ridiculous but seem to refuse to die, please see forthcoming email. JoshuaZ (talk) 17:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Rahan Arshad
I have nominated Rahan Arshad, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Rahan Arshad. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:47, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar of Madness!!

 * Wow! That's simply amazing work in 3 months. To think someone tried to speedy delete it... congratulations!  Majorly  (talk) 01:25, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the congrats! Again, we could never have done it on our own.  --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 01:51, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
This is your final warning. The next time you copy someone else signature you will be blocked. Monobi (talk) 03:59, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Your deletion of my pages
My editing tests were not vandalism, User:User:User was an attempt at humor and the other two were for testing. The reason I accidentally overwrote Talk:Main Page was that I was trying to copy the main page so that I could play with it and forgot the redirect. The way, the truth, and the light (talk) 11:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Please do not use create test pages. You're an established user, you should know better.  Majorly  (talk) 11:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Help?
I need help with my archiving. I want, if possible, to begin the bot archiving in my 3rd archive, all threads older than 2 days. Also, if possible, I've tried and failed, to have a new archive started automatically every two months, or do I have to do this manually?  D u s t i complain/compliment 16:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Have a good read of User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo. That's what I did.  Majorly  (talk) 23:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

RfCheck
Are you interested in running for RfCheck? I would be happy to nominate you. (Sorry about the self-revert earlier, I realised I did things in the wrong order.) WaltonOne 13:23, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd be honoured to. Whether I'd pass is another question - arbcom already said no, and I quite recently failed a third request for bureaucratship. That said, I'm happy to be a guinea pig to see if it works :) Thanks.  Majorly  (talk) 13:28, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * OK. It's at Requests for checkusership/Majorly. Answer the questions, and transclude it at WP:RFCHECK when you're ready. WaltonOne 13:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Simple English Wiki
Thanks for the info. That account isn't me as you correctly guessed. What do I do? Regards Sarah777 (talk) 02:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Can You Help?
I noticed someone reverted the edits I made to playmates other than Stephanie Adams, yet didn't revert the same edit to the playmate Stephanie Adams NonvocalScream sees fit to remove basic facts about only one playmate Stephanie Adams, from the EXACT SAME format of other playmate's articles, yet not remove those facts about them as well. Date of birth and measurements of playmates should remain for Stephanie Adams, just like they remain for the other playmates. This user has become a nuisance and is maliciously trying to damage this one particular article. Swiksek (talk) 00:22, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm sure there's a good reason for him doing that, and I hope he explains. I'd rather not get into an edit war about it though.  Majorly  (talk) 00:25, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:MISS question
Should User:DakotaKahn be listed? Appears to be a former admin. Maybe you know more? cheers,  Enigma  message 06:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The user is still very much here, but they were renamed.  Majorly  (talk) 11:54, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Restore image
Hello. Can your restore Image:Stargate SG-1 - 04x01.jpg for me please? I want to use it again in the article Small Victories. Thank you. – sgeureka t•c 08:17, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅  Majorly  (talk) 12:41, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episodes 46 and 47
Just a quick note: Wikipedia Weekly Episodes 46 and 47 are out. A good listen as always. :) Cheers,  W ODU P  03:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

You're receiving this because you're listed on WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.

Request for rollback
Hi i'm requesting for rollback again, it has been over a month since the edit war over the doctor who pictures, If i get my rollback privilages back i don't intend to misuse them again, i was a bit annoyed at matthew back then because he wouldn't discuss his actions on the talkpage thats why i misused the rollback fuction, i'm sorry please give me another chance.--Lerdthenerd (talk) 13:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Please over at WP:RFR. Thanks,  Majorly  (talk) 11:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Majorly, just a note, but he was pointed in your direction per RFR. Just to make you aware. Pedro : Chat  11:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - May 2008

 * The above newsletter was delivered by an automatic bot because you are registered on the WikiProject Big Brother spamlist. Please feel free to remove yourself if you do not wish to receive these messages anymore.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page. → This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 10:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:CBB
I'm surprised you missed this. One of the links on Wikipedia's main menu goes right to it.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   16:33, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I didn't miss it. That's nothing like what I want. I am not interested in making pretty templates.  Majorly  (talk) 16:44, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

New Project
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 17:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Community noticeboard
I saw that you had requested deletion, but I undeleted because it used to be a redirect and the old links hadn't been fixed. Are you OK with that? I also put the post-redirect discussion on Wikipedia talk:Community noticeboard. Carcharoth (talk) 16:44, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * It doesn't bother me.  Al Tally  (talk) 16:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)