User talk:MakeIt Simple

Speedy deletion nomination of ANX Blockchain Services


A tag has been placed on ANX Blockchain Services, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Domdeparis (talk) 13:37, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

I've removed the copy of your article on ANX Blockchain Services from this page since it does not belong here and you have already moved the material to draft space where it belongs. Meters (talk) 04:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked, and put a heading. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, Wikipedia,blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. I checked several of your refs and none appeared to be independent third-party sources. Most were just repeating what your chairman said.
 * There is absolutely nothing to suggest that your product meets the notability criteria, you just tell us what it's supposed to do, but no sales figures, profits etc. It's just a sales pitch with no verified facts about notability
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * ANX INTERNATIONAL in shouty capitals.
 * Examples of unsourced or improperly sourced claims presented as fact include: ABS is a ready-to-use blockchain product. The whole thing is just a sales pitch, with no real facts

Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:49, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * the article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * Gatecoin doesn't help you. Either it meets our criteria and yours doesn't, or they should both be deleted. You can, of course, nominate that article for deletion if you think it should not be here
 * Your edits indicate that you have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject, and you must declare it. In particular, if you work directly or indirectly for the company, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly, although reposting deleted text unchanged as a draft is unlikely to be adequate. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the company you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.