User talk:Make Our World Better

December 2009
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Mr. Ollie, I appreciate your note, thank you. However there is no conflict of interest or other inappropriate purpose and all concern about this can be easily resolved by looking deeper into the subject matter. Please look at the actual substance of the entries I have made today. Only this kind of substantive review will resolve the issue you have raised. Here is a brief summary but I would be glad to go deeper into the subjects with you if necessary. (1) Painters like Rembrandt and the Impressionists have been creating illusions of light in their paintings for thousands of years on opaque canvases, walls, wood panels etc. Artists have painted on plastic sheeting from the plastics stores none of which have ever been specially made with properties optimized for fine art. So, the invention of the first clear canvas with properties optimized for use as a canvas is major. (2) The invention of art, design and architecture using conductive polymer is major, not only in visual arts, but in the realm of OLEDs, solar cells, and other devices. As an example, imagine your favorite poster as your light fixture, e.g., an Ansel Adams photo or a changing image of wind blowing through the trees could be your light fixture. By any measurement, these are 2 major inventions. Refer to US Patent No. 7,629,400. It is totally inappropriate to delete such major inventions from Wikipedia! However I do appreciate the care with which you are watching over Wikipedia. Best regards Make Our World Better (talk) 15:58, 8 December 2009 (UTC) Make Our World Better

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 16:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi Mr Ollie,

Kindly read my note above and join my effort to create agreeable wording. After writing the note above I went back to the entries I made today and edited them in an effort to improve them. For example, the OLED page only mentioned Kodak patents and I edited the text to add some of the other major patent holders like DuPont, General Electric, Cambridge Display Technology, Sydney Hyman, etc. Why did you delete these only leaving Kodak? How is this educational and unbiased? Please read my first note. If you look at the actual substance of my entries you will see that they are totally valid. We need to work together to reach agreement. No agreement can be made if you just delete the other person's substantive entries. Let's work together. Thank you. Make Our World Better (talk) 16:27, 8 December 2009 (UTC) Make Our World Better