User talk:Makennatimm/sandbox

peer review for Makennatimm on Aspergillus carneus link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Makennatimm/sandbox -strong informative lead -this could be even better if you included a picture of your fungus -the taxonomic info is well organized and easy to understand; concise -includes many reliable resources -the industrial and medical applications is a unique sub-topic that I have yet to see other users include; very informative -a lot of good morphological and physiological information; very well organized EmmaKas (talk) 21:17, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review
Lead evaluation I really like the information you have chosen to include in your lead, it gives a basic description of your fungus, has all relevant information and provides the reader with a brief look at what they will learn about the fungus in the article. Content evaluation All of your heading are great and flow well, with lots of great information. The only comment i have is that i noticed you mention that its not common as a human pathogen but have an example of a child you had it as well as a patient who was successfully treated from this fungal, so maybe you could add another header like "rare cases of human infection" or something like that just to clarify that it can infect human but doesn't usually. I like how you grouped growth and physiology together because they can have very similar information, so you avoided repeating information unnecessarily, by putting them together. Tone and balance evaluation I find that your information is very unbiased and and that you provide the information in a clear manner without repetition of irrelevant information. Sources and references evaluation your sources are working properly, and they seem to be from reliable sources that are mostly fairly recent, so your information should be well up to date. Organization evaluation As of when i read your article the information is still in point form which is most likely because this is still just your draft, so it not as easy to read, but I'm sure once you put it into paragraphs it will flow nicely, as most of your point can easily be put together and the information flows well with each other in the order that it is in right now. New Article Evaluation You have lots of great sources, and it follows the pattern of most articles with relevant headings and infoboxes. you don't have any words that are linked but that may be because this is still just the draft. Overall evaluation Overall I think that your article is off to a great start, and once everything is finalized and put into proper format will look great and flow perfectly. Good luck on the rest of the assignment. SarahBoujan (talk) 04:23, 1 November 2019 (UTC)SarahBoujan