User talk:Makhkugeo/sandbox

A very detailed page that uses easy-to-read English. Some suggestions for you: --JacqCLSin (talk) 18:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * good uses of tables, very well-organised and consistent; I would suggest using bullet points in tables instead of numbered lists so that it looks less crammed with words
 * Be consistent with the units. In “Indosinian and Yanshanian magmatism” you spelled out “200,000 square kilometres” while in “Pacific-plate subduction models” you used “500 km”.
 * Can make the figures displayed in “Early Proterozoic” and “Late Proterozoic-Mesozoic” sections a larger size so that the readers don’t need to click into them for a quick look
 * Label the “Reference" section

Hi Tommy,

Very detailed page and good use of tables!


 * You could use more hyperlinks e.g. ocean island basalt, Archean, granite
 * What is "normal" subduction angle?
 * Some photos cannot be seen! You may show the difference between normal subduction and flat-slab subduction. Also, the figures in "Collision with NCB" can be enlarged.
 * Missing citations needed for "Yanshanian magmatism covers more than 200,000 square kilometres of area in the SCB espcecially Cathaysia Block.", "Tectonics" section.
 * Will there be more models included in the section of "Pacific-plate subduction models"?
 * The first row of the tables can be bold e.g. Time, Brief Tectonic History of SCB

Yansytang (talk) 15:34, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Ariel
1. Add citation for the Flat slab subduction model chart and mineral resources chart. 2. For the magnetism part, it would be great if you could add a cross-section showing the stratigraphic relationship of different rock units representing different stages of subduction. 3. More explanation could be given to the "challenges faced by the model" section, e.g. why the "500 km long E-W strike magmatic belt" does not fit the model. Just a line or two will do. Hkgeo4869 (talk) 06:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC)