User talk:Makoshack/Archive2

Archive: User talk:Makoshack/Archive

Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-09-14 Church of Scientology Moscow versus Russia
You should be aware that this mediation is in progress.--Fahrenheit451 07:38, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I wasn't, thank you. Makoshack 21:14, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I read it now and decided not to involve myself into this ridiculous game. Makoshack 21:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Unblocking and modification of the probation
Both Maksoshack and Misou have asked to be unblocked, as apparently there was an earlier acceptance of a claim that they were different people, although editing from a shared IP address. The problem with editing from a shared IP address (see checkuser) is that it is impossible for us to tell if multiple accounts with similar interests are really separate people or not. When one account edits disruptively, another account could be a different person who behaves more reasonably, or it could be a calculated good cop/bad cop strategy by one person, or two people coordinating their efforts, both of which are not allowed. Likewise, if one editor is blocked or banned, it is impossible to tell whether the other accounts are being used to circumvent the block or ban, either by one person using multiple accounts (sock puppets), or through multiple people coordinating their edits (sometimes called meat-puppetry). The alternative to blocking all but one account is to apply the same remedies, blocks and bans to all the accounts, which is consistent with the ruling at Requests_for_arbitration/COFS. If one account edits disruptively and is banned or blocked, the same ban or block will apply to all the accounts. It appears that and  are inactive for the time being, so this notice applies to,  and. All for one and one for all. If one of you is blocked or banned for any reason, that block or ban will be applied to all of you. For the time being, Shutterbug is banned from editing Scientology-related articles for 30 days from October 2, so that topic ban applies to Makoshack and Misou as well. You may make suggestions on the talk pages, and are encouraged to pursue the dispute resolution process (such as request for comment and request for third opinion) rather than getting into arguments. I will withdraw the 30-day extension of the topic ban, since you were not previously notified that bans applied to one apply to all. I hope this works out, and you should also be on notice that if there are repeated violations someone will eventually decide to stop accepting the shared account explanation. Good luck. Thatcher131 13:18, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I disagree to being subject to penalties of people I have not even met nor talked to, nor do I have means to restrain or control them. Further I doubt that any topic ban can actually be issued by you and do not feel affected by it, accordingly. Otherwise, thank you for listening and keep up the good work! Makoshack 00:07, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Sandbox
Please feel free to contribute positive assessments of Hubbard's personality by public Scientologists, Freezoners, and non-Scientologists to the draft section at Talk:L. Ron Hubbard/Sandbox. As I read Thatcher131's statement, "You may make suggestions on the talk pages, and are encouraged to pursue the dispute resolution process (such as request for comment and request for third opinion) rather than getting into arguments.", you are welcome to do so though if you have any doubts you might want to clarify first. --Justanother 13:38, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Mister
Dunno if we've met. What do you think about this shoot'em all logic? Misou 21:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Hard to follow, I agree. Makoshack 00:05, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom ban has been reinstated
Good afternoon. I'm advising you that due to continued edit warring at Free Zone (Scientology), you are being banned from editing any Scientology-related articles for another 30 days. This ban will expire on December 13, 2007, at 0:00 UTC. Note that if you violate this ban by editing these articles, you will be blocked. Thanks, --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs (st47) 00:31, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I am abroad right now and had not actually planned to edit in Wikipedia for the time being. But your behavior was brought to my attention. This demands a sortout and clarification. Would you please be so kind and let me know what rules you are applying? Makoshack 23:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I responded here. Makoshack 00:22, 15 November 2007 (UTC)