User talk:Malach

SCERTS® Model
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as SCERTS® Model, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.scerts.com/index.cgi?page=scerts. As a copyright violation, SCERTS® Model appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. SCERTS® Model has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:SCERTS® Model. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at SCERTS® Model, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- - Gl e n 15:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Barry Prizant
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Barry Prizant, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.murphyandmurphy.com/barryprizant/about.cfm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Barry Prizant. Then you should do one of the following:
 * Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Barry Prizant where we can find that note; or
 * Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! ccwaters 15:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Copyright issues
I am the web designer for both sites. I have recently taken them over from Murphy and Murphy. What is copyright infringement when all I did was take the iformation off the site, that Barry Prizant originally gave to Murphy and Murphy?--Malach 15:13, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. --Yamla 16:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked this account as you have been found to be violating copyright once again. Please note that it is not sufficient simply to change the occasional word around. In order to avoid plagiarism, you need to rewrite an article from scratch. Many of the sentences in Big Dan's Rape Case were exact copies or slight rewords from the source web site. --Yamla 16:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)


 * And as the webdsigner for the above two sights, I can get you the copyrighted wording that comes directly from Dr. Prizant. What you guys care though, doesn't matter, not that important anyway.  It just pisses me off, that this site has random rules, that are not enforced in a consistent manner, I can rattle you off HUNDREDS of articles here that are vetbatim copies of websites and such.  Whatever --Malach 03:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

So uhh, how long am I blocked? And why can I still make edit anonymously while my user account is blocked, I have done at least 25 of them and none of them have been deleted? Do you need me to apologizes all powerful wikipedia? Don't send me to the gulag, I can still be a good lover for Hitler. You guys are funny --Malach 02:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)