User talk:Malachi151

Welcome
Welcome! Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect intellectual property rights - do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view when editing articles - this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!-Andrew c [talk] 17:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Gospel of Mark
I really hope this doesn't discourage you from contributing to wikipedia, but I want to explain why I have moved your addition to Gospel of Mark to the talk page. On wikipedia, all content needs to be verifiable. We do this by attributing content to reliable sources. There were a lot of claims and things presented as facts that simply were not backed up by sources. If we say "scholars think X" then we must cite what scholars we are talking about. Also, wikipedia is not a primary source. And since it is an encyclopedia, we try to present concise, overview articles on topics. I do not believe copying verbatim large amount of scripture is appropriate here on wikipedia. I hope you understand. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. If you believe the content you added to the article is still valid, I suggest that you work on making it more concise, and work on adding sources to the material before adding back to the live article. If you need help with any of that, I'd be glad to try and assist where I can. Good luck.-Andrew c [talk] 17:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I strongly urge you to read, if you haven't already, the links in the welcome message, and familiarize yourself with wikipedia. Also I suggest reading WP:BRD. It is fine to make bold edits. But if an editor in good faith reverts a bold edit, it is NEVER appropriate to re-insert the controversial content. What is appropriate is to go to the talk page and work things out. Wikipedia is a community, and it works best with editors work together (even if they have differing opinions). I'm sure we can reach an agreement on the talk page, but undoing another's edit, and thereby attempting to force new content into an article against without consensus is a form of disruptive editing. Edit warring is never ok. Thanks for your consideration.-Andrew c [talk] 19:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Extensive use of literary allusion
You added a section on the use of literary allusion to the Gospel of Mark which may contain content lacking references to verifiable sources. Please respond to the requests for sources by adding them or indicating more clearly how the content is derived from the reference you supplied by using page numbers. Thank you. --Ovadyah (talk) 16:56, 23 May 2009 (UTC)