User talk:Malcolm Farmer

I hope the "grandma" question I asked 216 will work: "do you want to do this, or shall I do that?" --Ed Poor -- explain how the article count just jumped 5000 articles in a day user_talk:hfastedge

Grey Loris & Primates
I can not find a critter named Grey Loris in the taxonomic records. What is it called now? Also, you may want to join WikiProject Primates. - UtherSRG 15:26, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Your uploaded image
Thanks for taking the photo Image:Scott memorial binton.jpg and uploading it. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know how you want to license it? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or  if you want to put it in the public domain, etc.) Thanks so much,    – Quadell (talk) (help)   02:31, Oct 4, 2004 (UTC)


 * Hi,


 * i have copyied the photos Image:Commodore_4032.jpg and Image:Commodore 4040.jpg to Wiki commons and noticed that doesn't have also an image copyright tag. --Fedi 18:36, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

--Fine. I've Marked them as PD. Malcolm Farmer 20:23, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Flatulence: starch vs oligosaccharides
I've started a discussion on this subject at Talk:Flatulence. Since it looks like you wrote the text in question, I'd appreciate your input, although I realise it's nearly three years since you wrote that :) Ta. -- JTN 22:43, 2004 Oct 14 (UTC)

Adminship
May I nominate you for adminship? uc 22:02, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I have nominated you for adminship at Requests for adminship/Malcolm Farmer. Please edit that page and indicate your acceptance, as some people involved in adminship matters now expect that to be done even though you have already agreed to be nominated. Please be aware that there are baseless objections to many adminship nominations; do not be upset if that should occur. If you have any questions or comments, you can contact me on my talk page or via email. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 16:15, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Since you accepted the nomination, would you mind answering the candidate questions on Requests for adminship? They will aid users that don't know you in their decision. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 21:15, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)

Warning
Please do not break the Three revert rule. You appear to have five reverts in less than 15 minutes. There's really nothing to be gained by doing this, and in situations where one party is blocked for violating the rule, we must treat all violators equally. Please let others revert the article as needed. Cool Hand Luke  12:28, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Congratulations, Malcolm!
Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the administrators' reading list before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the Main Page. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new administrators' how-to guide helpful. Cheers! -- Cecropia | explains it all ® 16:58, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Unverified images
Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:


 * Image:Isaac_disraeli.jpg

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License,  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 22:20, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Thanks
Hi, thanks for reverting the David Blunkett vandal -- you reverted him just before I got round to it again, while I was busy barring him for 48 hours first! The idiot was daft enough to actually seriously libel Blunkett in his first round of edits an hour ago, so I left a strong warning on his page then, so no mercy this time! -- Arwel 13:57, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Napoleon Gambit on vfd
Hi Malcolm,

I see that you have made some edits to the new Napoleon Gambit article. I have now listed it for deletion because the variations given seemed to be all wrong, and becuase "Napoleon Gambit" is not a chess opening. Also the article looked like an unchessic mess (None of this is your fault). If you are interested the debate is at Votes for deletion/Napoleon Gambit. Sjakkalle 09:48, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

"Old Encyclopedia"
I notice that at least some of the very old "from an 1880s edition of an unnamed encylopedia" stuff seems to have been put there by you (see Talk:Pope Martin V). The rationale you provide for not naming the encyclopedia is, in fact, not valid, and not how we do things at this point. Am I correct in assuming that all of these references are to the 9th edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica? john k 16:04, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for helping me revert that spam-vandal. For some reason, my computer (or Wikipedia?) was being really slow and it was taking forever for me to rollback his edits. &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 09:09, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

My Talk page
Hello! I wondered why you'd deleted a couple of (innocuous) messages from my Talk page?

Punch cartoon commentary
If I'm not missing something, your interpretation varies from mine only in that it identifies the swim as a cross-channel swim, and Smith as coach rather than merely rower. We both, I think, identify and agree on the people, the nearness of prorogation and the pursuing issues/waves of free education and land purchase. I'm happy if you want to edit the caption, especially to add info on the cross-channel business. Any other diffs are possibly to do with me trying to be concise. Enjoy. And yes, I might edit your edits until we reach a consensus :) --Tagishsimon (talk)


 * Captain Matthew Webb was the first man to swim the English channel (between England and France), in 1875. He used breaststroke, swimming 21.26 miles in 21 hours and 45 minutes. No other man or woman swam the channel for the next 31 years. From, FWIW. --Tagishsimon (talk)

Your mom
Hello

You deleted this article as a speedy (I guess) due to vandalism. You forgot to check its rather large past history, which contained a full article, which has been referenced by media sources, etc. Any chance of a fix-up job here? --Kiand 19:26, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * I restored the article. Thanks, Kiand. Malcolm, don't forget to check the history of an article before deleting it. &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 17:31, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

220.239.43.192
220.239.43.192 is really starting to get on my nerves... Gringo300 04:05, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

You should try looking at the bands bios on multiple sites... I.E. Purevolume, their original website (www.SDAHM.com) is no longer up

Inoculation
Of which you are the earliest recorded author, looks to me as if it could be a Good Article now. Midgley 13:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

:)
Thanks for the revert! --F a ng Aili 說嗎? 20:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

*whistle*
Good god. You've been on WP for over five years. That's bloody impressive, that is! Well done! DS 14:23, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

CBM 8032 or CBM 4032 ?
Because of the size of the screen I would say that is a CBM 8032 rather than a 4032, isn´t it?

You discribe it as a 4032. ;-) --84.145.193.224 20:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

I just went upstairs and looked. 4032 is what it says on the front panel. Malcolm Farmer 23:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi, I found out, that there are two different editions of the 4032: [thin (4032-a)] and [fat (4032-b)]. Your picture shows the fat one ;-) --84.145.171.54 16:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Nice work on the spam one
Nice collection - time for a "spam im" warning? I put a basic one on. Cheers --Nigel (Talk) 19:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * OK I got another one so did it anyway - cheers - --Nigel (Talk) 19:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Mary Enda Tookey
Why did you delete the entry on Mary Enda Tookey?

OnShare
FYI there is a WP:CSD for copyvio's. The tag can take weeks or even months for something to get deleted as long as the page has been created in the last 48 hours you can use the CSD. Whisp e ring 20:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Theory
As any other theory it's just a theory, not a fact. They are some evidence that can be interpreted in a different way, Big Bang's become a religion of some sort, there are lesser evidence day by day, and why every such theory will always be just a theory is did anyone been there and experenced it?

Move
Could you move my page User:Lazylaces/Main to User:Lazylaces? and the talk pages. I can't gat the orange bar of death anymore. Cheers, Lazylaces (Talk to me 14:02, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Typo redirect Geoffrey thorne
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Geoffrey thorne, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Geoffrey thorne is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Geoffrey thorne, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Loch ness monster
A tag has been placed on Loch ness monster, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ṜέđṃάяķvίʘĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line 20:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Young marvelman annual.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Young marvelman annual.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 12:23, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Some old pages
Hi Malcolm, the "new topics" page is still around at New topics, and I've just replaced the list of articles there with an explanation of how the page was used. Could you take a peek at that page? Feel free to correct any errorrs I made there and/or add your own notes. I've also history merged your user page. Hope you don't mind. Graham 87 12:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Image:Richard jefferies.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Richard jefferies.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Worcester
Hi ! an article you have contributed to, has been selected for the Wikipedia Version 0.8. offline release on DVD and iPhone. If you would like to make any last minutes changes or improvements, you are most welcome to do so. Deadline is midnight UTC on Monday, 11 October. See also: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Worcestershire/Archive 1.--Kudpung (talk) 04:52, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Samuel Butler (poet)


A tag has been placed on Samuel Butler (poet) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Phearson (talk) 00:07, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I've removed the tag. Graham 87 02:09, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:06, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:06, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 16:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

HomePage listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HomePage. Since you had some involvement with the HomePage redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). ''TheChampionMan1234 00:41, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Administrators&oldid=526254016#Restoration_of_the_tools_.28proposal.29 recent change] to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

DefinitionOfLogic listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect DefinitionOfLogic. Since you had some involvement with the DefinitionOfLogic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:54, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Phantom cat


The article Phantom cat has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unencyclopedic list of speculation about non-existent animals.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —PermStrump ( talk )  05:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Just to let you know
You have been mentioned at Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 16:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)please ping me

Historical anniversaries/September 21 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Historical anniversaries/September 21. Since you had some involvement with the Historical anniversaries/September 21 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:29, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Historical anniversaries/September 2 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Historical anniversaries/September 2. Since you had some involvement with the Historical anniversaries/September 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:29, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Historical anniversaries/May 29 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Historical anniversaries/May 29. Since you had some involvement with the Historical anniversaries/May 29 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Historical anniversaries/July 20 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Historical anniversaries/July 20. Since you had some involvement with the Historical anniversaries/July 20 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of HomePage


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on HomePage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GammaRadiator (talk) 23:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 182


The article 182 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "article is not about 182"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 07:05, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I've reverted the recent vandalism to the page, and it's back to normal now. Graham 87 16:07, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society
Dear ,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. &#x200B;

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 16:36, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stormbringer


The article Stormbringer has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence this fictional object passes GNG/NFICTION."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yahoo (Gulliver's Travels)


The article Yahoo (Gulliver's Travels) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
You made cat page! Here's a cat!

KrystopherNystrom (talk) 05:39, 23 August 2021 (UTC) 
 * Nope, he didn't, he just made the first surviving edit to that page. Many early edits are lost; see Usemod article histories. Graham 87 16:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Stormbringer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stormbringer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Stormbringer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:41, 15 February 2022 (UTC)