User talk:Maleabroad

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Simplified Ruleset
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Glossary

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!--Dangerous-Boy 21:47, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

plenty for you to do
Hinduism-related topics notice board--Dangerous-Boy 22:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

HInduism
--D-Boy 20:39, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Do not
Adding POV ramblings to articles is one thing, but to try to emphasise them by making the passage bold as per this edit is precariously close to vandalism.&mdash;Nat Krause(Talk!) 17:10, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion
I've added the "prod" template to the article Buddha as an Avatar of Vishnu, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Buddha as an Avatar of Vishnu. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Addhoc 20:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

spam
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Jeune Europe. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites that you are affiliated with, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. I hope you will revert all your edits yourself. Intangible 17:43, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Regardless of the content of a link, it's always inappropriate to put the same link in multiple articles. I've removed every one of them for you. If you think the link is appropriate in individual articles, and that I removed it improperly, you might bring the issue up on the relevant article talk page. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 18:32, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
For constructive edits to Hinduism related articles.Bakaman Bakatalk 04:49, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Brahma Kumaris page
If you would like to edit that page, please discuss about it in the Talk page first. Otherwise, it will be considered vandalism. Your insults are also against WIKIPEDIA best practices and I will report you.

Best Wishes, avyakt7 19:20, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Cowards remark
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Addhoc 11:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. &mdash;  Nearly Headless Nick  {L} 18:06, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Mediterranean race
What on earth are you talking about? It's irrelevant because it is not about the "Mediterranean race", which is the subject of the article. It is also full of inaccuracies. One section was a general statement about the concept of "Caucasoids" and the other was about the sons of Noah! Also "Maleabroad", please don't hide behind anonymity. Paul B 18:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Anti-Brahmanism
Dear User, your comments are valuable. /* Ambedkar and Brahmins */ Moved to the more relevant article Anti-Brahmanism article. You can contribute more.Ambedkaritebuddhist 13:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Maleabroad vandalizing Brahma Kumaris page again- last warning
Please do not change content without discussion. This is called vandalism. You were warned and blocked before.

72.91.4.91 00:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC) Avyakt7


 * No it is not called vandalism, actually. It may just be over enthusiasm or inexperience. Don't bit the newcomers, help them.


 * 195.82.106.244 02:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Personal attack by Riveros11

 * Maleabroad,


 * OK, just to help you understand what is going on the Brahma Kumaris page.


 * Riveros is a Brahma Kumari from Tampa. BK Luis Riveros, a teacher and a recruiter for what he calls the "New Religious Movement" of the BKWSU. I personally do not agree is it is one. A "New Religious Movement" would make it another Kali Yugi cult. He is seeking to dominate the article by intimidating any other contributor away and recently he learnt the new trick of slapping Vandalism accusations on every one else to damage their reputation and have them blocked. Encourged by a group of BKs, he is attempting to re-writing the article along the lines of his chosen quotations from academic papers and exclude any self-published material from the BKWSU which is, of course, wholly acceptable. He refuses any other's input.


 * If you want to contribute, it is probably best to enter into discussion about the article first and make conservative changes first. This is, of course, a waste of time because Luis does not want to listen and will ignore you. I tried to engage him in discussion via Arbitration and Mediation, notifying him of it, but he refused to engage. But, we have to try, if nothing else to expose what he is up to.


 * I do not know where you are coming from as regards the BKWSU but best play by the rules of the Wiki. You could if you wish put in a complaint to the admins about Luis behavior because he is quite clearly attempting to use intimidation to dominate the article.


 * Good luck. If I can help you, I will. 195.82.106.244 02:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi
Just to notify you that a tendentious new user named User:Godblessindia has been POV-vandalizing Dalit and related articles. Just check his contribs Hkelkar 22:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Content dispute NOT vandalism
Please work with other editors on Buddha as an Avatar of Vishnu. Reverting dozens of edits as you have done might be considered vandalism, but what the other editors are doing (working on the article), does not. Please discuss your differences about what the content should be on the talk page, do not simply keep reverting to the version you like from several days ago. &mdash;Hanuman Das 18:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Would you please restore the work I have done adding diacritics and correcting spelling mistakes ? Every time you revert to an earlier version, you trash my work.  I am really not happy with this ignorant, ill-mannered behaviour.  If you can't cooperate, I shall refer this matter for arbitration.--Stephen Hodge 23:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Branding other editors
Please stop branding all editors who disagree with you as "neo-Buddhists". That's a violation of the assume good faith policy. Also, please stop refering to their good faith edits as "vandalism" - they aren't. If you have a content dispute about an article, please apply the official dispute resolution processess. Thanks! &mdash;Hanuman Das 21:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Riveros11 and signing in when editing Discussion pages
Hey,

don't worry about that Riveros11 guy. Most folks can see what he is up to. My suggestion to you is to report him because he is deliberating trying to intimidate you from editing the BKWSU page as he is others by using the vandalism warnings. Others are doing so.

But please,

'''When editing on User Talk or Article Talk pages, please sign your name using four tildes ~ when making your posts. '''

This will automatically put in your name and the datestamp. Thanks. 195.82.106.244 03:43, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank You
Maleabroad, Thank you for your positive contributions to Adhyatmik Ishwariya Vishwa Vidyalaya (AIVV), this is most helpful as I understand there is a wider interest in this religion. Any links to related articles would be helpful or cross references. Also, could you assist in keeping vandals from deleting the page as it is very hard to find others that are familiar with religions from this area or the terminology. So, you are a welcomed resource to this article. Thank you again.

maga
I did not say the Magi were descended from Rajputs. I said there was a Brahmin caste among the Rajputs called the Magacharya who are descended from the Iranian Magi. Exactly what you said. Also, the Rig Veda denounced the worship of idols or images as non-Aryan or mleccha. In the later Vedas and more prominently, during the time of the Indo-Greeks, image worship and idols played a more prominent role in Indian religious life, beginning with the Greco-Buddhist statues in ancient northwestern India (now western Pakistan and eastern Afghanistan). Afghan Historian 20:49, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for not responding sooner. I was busy. The Iranians, or their Indo-Iranian forbears at least, used to worship the Devas until for some apparent reason, they abandoned the Devas for the Asuras or Ahuras, switching the dichotomy. Is possible that tribes of the Aryans did this wholescale, signalling their transition into the Iranian branch. Or, the Iranians themselves, even after the split, still worshipped the Devas. However, by the time of the arrival of Zoroastrianism, the dichotomy was recorded to have been reversed and the Iranians from then on until the time of Islam, worshipped the Ahuras as opposed to the Devas. So the Iranians did worship the Devas in some form, but were compelled to switch the dichotomy and worship the Ahuras instead, either due to a disagreement with the Indians or due to theological pressures from Zoroaster. With regards to Indra and Indar, I'm not sure. I was under the impression that, since Indra, apart from little characteristics, has no apparent counterpart outside of the Indo-Aryan world, he was in some degree based on a historical Indo-Aryan leader who was deified for some sort of attempted genocide (ie: wiping out their ethnic enemies, either the Iranian Aryans or the indigenous Indians.). Hope that helps. Afghan Historian 18:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

BKWSU and Hinduism
These people want to remove their activities as far from being classified to or connected with Hinduism as possible. The even claim that Raja Yoga is not Hindu.

I wrote a lengthy edit about the origins of the organization in the Sind, here and they tore it to pieces demanding citations and references from Western academics whilst refusing to look at accept those from the sub-continent - which were given. The thought that their founder Kirpalani was a Vallabacharya was just too much for them I think! Likewise they want to hide away the Brahmin principles which are quite ordinary in India.

I am very glad to be able to prove the actions of this American teacher who has been intimidating not just you and I but others also with his vandalism trick. 195.82.106.244 10:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Maleabroad,
 * I have been away while doing some research to get the items removed by Riveros11 and the BK IT Team back into the article. I am in agreement with you on the value (historical/sociological/religious) of the origins of the NRM/Sect (Brahma Kumaris). Yes, I am in agreement that Riveros11 doesn't listen, nor does he discuss, nor enters into discussion in a neutral way. So, when I do bring forth the citations it would be nice if you could offer the Hindu meanings as I am not as well versed as you in that area.  Also, please don't let Riveros11/Avyakt7 and all the many IP's that he uses incite you as your knowledge base is too valuable to other articles beyond this one to risk being banned.  He seems to home in on editors that may pose a challenge and has had his focus on other editors. Also, please note that other editors like myself, are just trying our best to work on articles of interest to us, have good intension and are very dedicated.
 * You are correct in that the Brahma Kumaris tell folks they can be of any religion to partake of the "Knowledge", but I see now that Riveros11 is claiming that it is now mainly a Western emerging religion, with a greater Western influence? Yes, it is odd considering that 90% of the BKs are of Indian origin....I wonder how they would take such news! Have you heard the term ERASURE?  I first heard about it in the late 90's in a sociology conference (annual) in Houston Texas from a sociologist from Brown University.  In essence his paper was about the sociological ERASURE (erasing people's history) within the black community to denote their history, their contributions and their identity (to lose this can be devastating). So, your efforts are not lost as I see the value of the origins, the value in the people from whom we take, the historical meaning within and  yet others try to erase. I now see what he was speaking about in the world context of sociological study.
 * So, thanks for hanging in there and look to future discussions with a neutral party such as yourself. PEACETalkAbout 01:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Maleabroad,


 * I don't know entirely where you are coming you from, with regards the BKWSU issue, but you cant just blast a Wiki article like that. It will only work against your position. However angry and upset you are, however wrong you might consider the statements, you will only defeat yourself by acting in such a manner. Be cool headed.


 * Wiki policy is a higher authority than truth and in this, and all other cases of the Wikipedia. Riveros11 will "win" purely because that references is an academic reference not you or his "point of view". If you want to make a statement. Unfortunately you have to find a citable reference, written by an expert, that supports you position. You could be of great help IF you can find reputable Hindu/India sources to support your references.


 * This to me was where the article places the BKWSU in its proper Indian context and I'd appreciate your comments on it. 195.82.106.244 02:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Email

 * Namaskaar. Could you please email me at desigeek111_AT_yahoo.com ? Thank you. Hkelkar 21:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Did you ever email him?--D-Boy 10:52, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris
Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Srikeit 17:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

No personal attacks
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. I refer to the edit comment in this edit. &mdash;Hanuman Das 06:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Brahman in Earliest Buddhism
Stop restoring this section to various articles and sundry, unless you are going to respond to the discussion about it here: Talk:Brahman.&mdash;Nat Krause(Talk!) 06:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:CIV
Really, the uncivility of your edit summaries will not be tollerated further, please understand this. WP:CIV and WP:NPA are official wikipedia policies, and their constant disregard will bring to your block. Cheers,--Aldux 17:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Sati (practice)
Hello. First, I agree with the post above by Aldux. Further, I have reverted your recent change to Sati (practice). Reasons for the significant changes made since your last previous edit have been given in the talk pages and in the edit summaries. You ignored these, and went back to the last edit that you made. I suggest that you address those reasons in discussion with your fellow contributors, in line with Wikipedia policies as described above, before you make more changes. Imc 18:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * For the edit summary at Sati (practice), in which you have confirmed your determination not to heed the warnings received, I have blocked you for 31h for uncivility. You are welcome to return once the block expires, but please attempt to be more civil and collaborative, or other blocks may follow.--Aldux 18:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * You must understand that lock evasion will only lengthen your block, for now, I will only bring it to 48h. Newer sockpuppetry will bring to longer blocks.--Aldux 18:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Sigh* I see you haven't understood, now the block is 96 hours. Also keep in mind that for WP:BLOCK you're edits made as a sock are not legitimate and as such shall be reverted on sight.--Aldux 01:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


 * (Double *sigh*) Maleabroad, let me really clear this time. If you insist in not observing the block, you risk receiving an indefinite ban from wikipedia. Please understand, with your behaviour you are putting yourself in an unpleasant situation.--Aldux 19:22, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Temporary Injunction
A temporary injunction has been passed in Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris. All editors listed as a party to this case are banned from editing Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University until the case is settled.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 11:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Temporary Injunction
A temporary injunction has been passed in Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris. All editors listed as a party to this case are banned from editing Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University until the case is settled.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 11:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris
This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

195.82.106.244 is banned for one year for a personal attack which contained a threat against another user. 195.82.106.244 is placed on Probation. He may be banned from editing any article which he disrupts by engaging in aggressive biased editing, especially that relying on inadequately sourced original research. Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University is placed on article probation. The principals in this matter are expected to convert the article from its present state based on original research and BK publications to an article containing verifiable information based on reliable third party sources. After a suitable grace period, the state of the article may be evaluated on the motion of any member of the Arbitration Committee and further remedies applied to those editors who continue to edit in an inappropriate manner. Any user may request review by members of the Arbitration Committee. Should any user violate a ban imposed under the terms of this decision, they may be blocked for an appropriate period of time. All blocks to be logged at Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 17:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

(Copied from elsewhere)

 * copying this comment by User:Afghan Historian from a contribution mistakenly put in article space, at Maleabroad (now deleted). Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Maleabroad, when I said "found" I said I found it in my search, not actually start the article, lol! Also, it was initially full of POV, probably added later on. It made statements suggesting Hinduism as being followed in Iran, when it was never followed there to begin with. Hinduism and Zoroastrianism both stem from a comon faith. Also, I'm not Zoroastrian, but I am a Pakistani of Pashtun background and indeed of ultimate Iranian origin. Some of my ancestors would definitely been followers of Zoroastrianism Afghan Historian 21:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Brown people
An editor has nominated the article Brown people for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Articles for deletion/Brown people. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Brown people during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 16:37, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
If an article gets vandalised, you can correct this without re-inserting the article. See WP:REVERT for instructions. It is much quicker.--Anthony.bradbury 19:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Neutral Point of View

 * 1) [[Image:Information.png|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Hindu. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia.  ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk)  00:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) [[Image:Information.png|25px]] Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.  GizzaChat  © 00:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) [[Image:Nuvola_apps_important.svg|25px]] Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GizzaChat  © 00:46, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) [[Image:Stop_hand.svg|25px]] This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gizza<sup style="color:teal;">Chat  <b style="color:teal;">©</b> 01:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) [[Image:Nuvola_apps_important.svg|25px]] You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule&#32;on Hindu. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. <b style="font-family:comic sans ms; color:purple;">¤~Persian Poet Gal</b> <sup style="color:purple;">(talk)  01:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) [[Image:Stop_hand.svg|25px]] You have violated the three-revert rule&#32;on Shem. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future, instead of edit warring. Abecedare 02:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) [[Image:Stop_hand.svg|25px]] You have violated the three-revert rule&#32;on Shem. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future, instead of edit warring. Abecedare 02:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked
<div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks"> You have been blocked for continued disruption, including personal attacks and revert-warring. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Luna Santin 06:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * See AN/I thread and AN/3 thread for more information. Luna Santin 06:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * please try to be constructive, avoid edit-warring, and discuss on talkpages. Otherwise you risk that your contributions keep being reverted. Oh, and it's om MANI padme hum, not MAHI, you may want to check your sources on that too. dab (𒁳) 08:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Brahmin Contributions to Other Religions
I have added a "" template to the article Brahmin Contributions to Other Religions, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. <b style="color:teal;">Gizza</b><sup style="color:teal;">Chat  <b style="color:teal;">©</b> 07:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Reverts
May I please know what is the current to and fro reverts all about?Kanchanamala

Does this user know he has a talk page?
I have come to the conclusion that this user may not be aware of his talk page. In which case we are all just talking to ourselves! Oh, dear. Perhaps some one can clue him in via a minor edit on an article. PEACETalkAbout 04:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Narahari Sonar
A tag has been placed on Narahari Sonar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. DanielRigal (talk) 10:35, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hellenism and Hinduism


The article Hellenism and Hinduism has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No significant material not already better covered at Proto-Indo-European religion. Appears to be WP:OR.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LordVetinari (talk) 03:27, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Sena Nhavi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sena Nhavi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sena Nhavi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dwaipayan (talk) 19:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Indian warriors


The article List of Indian warriors has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Original research: Anachronistic classification of everyone from mythical/ancient kings to modern Indian Army soldiers along caste/ethnic lines. Content is covered under more precise and accurate articles/categories such as List of Indian monarchs and Category:Indian Army personnel.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. utcursch &#124; talk 23:30, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Indian warriors for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Indian warriors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Indian warriors until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanamonde (talk) 15:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)