User talk:Malik07

Image tagging for Image:Pm-small.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Pm-small.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 19:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pm-small.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Pm-small.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Abdus Salam
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Warthog Demon  22:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 04:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Redesign
I recently did a redesign of the Ahmadiyya template. Let me know what you think: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Ahmadiyya&diff=163634682&oldid=162409891

Give your opinion here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Ahmadiyya#Redesign

-- Enzuru 19:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Re:YouTube
Please stop placing YouTube links on articles as a citation; YouTube videos are not in line with the official Verifiability policy or the Reliable sources content guideline. Furthermore, it also does not satisfy the Notability guideline. If you have information from a reliable, published second-hand source then that is fine. Blogs, videos, editorials, opinion pages, etc. are not. MezzoMezzo 11:25, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * You say the reference for your edits are in Nantowi's book. Alright.  If that's the case, then you should be using his book as a reference.  I explained this to you, it's not complicated, but i'll explain it again: YouTube is not a reliable source.  If you think the information is relevant, you need two things: first, an actual reference based on his book, not a YouTube video or blog or opinion page or the like.  Second, you need a reliable, published, neutral secondary source that proves his information is notable.  Wikipedia is not an [|indiscriminate collection of information]; it is also not a soapbox or a publisher of original thought.  Just because you think what the guy says is wrong or notable doesn't make it so; you need proof for that.


 * I would also like to remind you that edit summaries like this one are not helpful. Vandalism is the attempt to compromise Wikipedia's integrity; what we have here is a legitimate content dispute and for you to accuse me of vandalism simply because we disagree teeters on the edge of the official No personal attacks policy.  It's fine if we disagree, but you need to do so in a polite manner.  Also, please log in when making edits. MezzoMezzo 16:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Rabwa - Chenab Nagar
Hi, with reference to you recent edits to "Rabwa" - I have started a discussion on the relevant talk page regarding the need to mentions the alternative name as well. Regards, Nazli 03:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Nazli (talk) 04:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Nazli (talk) 03:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Nazli (talk) 04:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. This is based on this edit. Green Giant (talk) 11:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Little context in Maulana Kaukub Okarvi
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Maulana Kaukub Okarvi, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Maulana Kaukub Okarvi is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Maulana Kaukub Okarvi, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Maulana Kaukub Okarvi
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Maulana Kaukub Okarvi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)