User talk:Malik Daiy

Welcome!
Hello, Malik Daiy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Orange High School (Ohio) have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. —C.Fred (talk) 00:37, 12 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The school webpage for Orange High School (Ohio) https://w.taskstream.com/ts/department6/OrangeHighSchoolAdministration.html/poh0hd00pvhwhuh1hxhphwha]] still lists Paul Lucas as the principal. You will have to provide a reliable source if the principal has changed but the school's website has not. Meters (talk) 00:39, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Orange High School (Ohio), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''We cannot use first-hand "I go there" accounts as a source; we need information to have been published. If the school hasn't updated its website yet, perhaps a local newspaper has reported the change?'' —C.Fred (talk) 00:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Orange High School (Ohio) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 00:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Also, this edit summary is unacceptable. I've been trying to help you out by looking for a news story to support your change, but I'm not finding anything. If you want to help, edit constructively; abusive messages toward other editors will lead to your account being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 00:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 00:52, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. —C.Fred (talk) 01:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 01:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)