User talk:Malikafernandes

1.	The lead: does it give us a clear overview of the page and contents?

Yes. Everything is listed in a clear and succinct manner.

2.	The writing overall: is it well-sourced (i.e. every statement and fact has a source, even if it repeats) and is it neutral, objective, and unbiased; does it contain errors?

Yes. every sentence, statement and fact have a source linked to it. The language of the statements are neutral, objective and unbiased. Under professional experience, the first sentence starts with “she” and the sentence after that mentions Ross’ name.

3.	Are there links to other pages within wikipedia? Do these make sense? What might you suggest?

Yes. The links to make sense and provide more context.

4.	Are there “external links”? Do these make sense? What might you suggest?

The facebook link seems out of place but works as a source.

5.	What do you think this piece could benefit from, overall, assuming the sources/information are available? Finally, does it adhere to the Wikipedia guidelines of biographies of (a) women and (b) (if relevant) living persons?

Yes. The information provided adheres to the Wikipedia guidelines.