User talk:Maliks10/sandbox

Eric Jin's Peer Review
It is a nice draft that describes the features of rosa rugosa and its history. The lead is clear, and the paragraphs can be easily understood. A neutral tone is used, and the structure is balanced. 3 sources are used in the draft, but some are from websites. A few cited pictures of rosa rugosa can be added to the article which will certainly help readers to identify the species. There are a few grammar mistakes that you can change: "Each leaf is a elliptical in shape" should be "Each leaf is elliptical in shape " "... in the United States for a long time that people have believe that it is native to New England" should be "... in the United States for a long time that people have believed that it is native to New England." Over all, you really did a great job on this draft! --RWJinZhugEo (talk) 03:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)RWJinZhugEo

Nicole Micallef's Peer Review
I like how you describe what exactly the Rosa rugosa is and where it comes from. You also go into a great amount of detail in discussing the looks of the plant. The description of the plant is also very good and direct. You do not go into any extra unnecessary detail and you are straight to the point. You are very good at not going into any extra detail. It is very straight and to the point which makes it very easy for the reader to find what information they are looking for. You go through the history of the plant and why it is considered invasive. Overall, I believe that you are on the right track with the right idea. There aren't any grammatical errors that I can spot right off the bat. Good job! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Micallen0713 (talk • contribs) 02:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)