User talk:Malinaccier/September 2007

Reply to your comment on Requests for adminship/markles
On the contrary:

A) I won't relish it at all - it's just something I'll do from time-to-time.

B) I wouldn't be crazy - it doesn't mean that much to me.

C) Nobody could get in my way - there are no individual ways, just the Wikipedia policies.

—Markles 02:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Requests for adminship/Pedro 2
I thought you should be aware that you've had responses to your !vote. --Dweller 10:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Same goes for Requests for adminship/Dreadstar.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 14:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Ummm,

I need all the help I can get, but... you already !voted.

Thanks, though, for the original support, and giving me the benefit of the doubt. --barneca (talk) 21:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

RFA Thanks
  Click there to open your card! → → → Dearest Malinaccier, Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 96 supports, 1 oppose, and 3 neutrals. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm a new admin remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them. I would like to give a special shout out to Hirohisat,  Wizardman , and  Husond , for there original co-nominations. Thank you once again and good day. Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor

Credits
This RFA thanks was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunatly this is not entirely my own design.

Dreadstar RfA
  Click there to open your card! → → → Malinaccier, Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 55 supports, 15 oppose, and 1 neutral. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to vote in my nomination. I'm a new admin, so if you have any suggestions feel free to let me know. I would like to give a special shout out to Fang Aili,  Phaedriel , and  Anonymous Dissident , for their co-nominations. Thank you all!  Dreadstar

This RFA thanks was inspired by The Random Editor's modification of  Phaedriel's RFA thanks.

Thanks for your support, I took the easy way out of thanking everyone by borrowing someone else's thank you card design...but know that I sincerely appreciate your support and confidence in me! I also greatly appreciated your staunch defense..! Dreadstar †  05:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Weak Oppose for RfA for Captmondo
Hello there:

Before answering your opposition I just wanted to be sure that we are talking about the same thing: could you define what you mean by "wikispace edits"? I am assuming that this means working on procedural tasks (i.e. Feature Article and Good Article nominations, and discussions on same), right?

Perhaps asking this question alone disqualifies me for Adminship, but I'd rather be an informed than blunder into a baseless response.

Cheers! Captmondo 19:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the response. I hadn't realized that that was a prerequisite for Adminship, but am certainly up to the task. I may or may not make it as an Admin this time around, but in any event I will make more of an effort to contribute to this area to the best of my ability. Cheers! Captmondo 02:08, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

My knowledge of policy
Hi,

Thanks for sounding off your opinion on my RFA.

You asked to prove my knowledge of policy on your talk page.

I don't exactly know how do you want me to prove it, but if you want to test me in any way, go ahead. As I said in the discussion there - I read the policy back and forth a long time before I nominated myself. Because the policy documents are so well written, I didn't need to ask for much help about them - I can read them myself. I don't think that I need to participate in a discussion of a policy document to be able to implement it correctly.

If you still want tangible proof, take a look at the list of AFD's that I proposed. The list is not long, but I think that it's enough of a proof. Most of them were eventually deleted, which proves my good understanding of what Wikipedia is and what it is not. I also withdrew some of them in a friendly manner, which proves that I can learn from mistakes.

If there is anything more that I can clarify, please tell me. Thanks in advance. --Amir E. Aharoni 07:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Barneca RfA thank you spam
Malinaccier, thank you for your support during my RfA, especially after the concerns that were brought up by other editors. I'll keep all of the comments in mind in the coming months, and will try again later (and I'll have more wikispace edits by then, too!). In the mean time, if you see me doing something stupid, please let me know. See you around. --barneca (talk) 12:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

The now-traditional RFA thank-spam
  Click there to open your card! → → →  Dear , Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on my talk page. Special thanks to WaltonOne and Dihydrogen Monoxide for nominating me. iride scent  (talk to me!)   21:12, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Credits
This design was brazenly stolen from inspired by Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 's RFA Thanks, which in turn was inspired by  Phaedriel's RFA thanks.

RFA Thanks!
Thanks for your participation for my RFA bid and for your support.--JForget 23:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Hi,

I succeeded at my RfA nomination.

I strongly believe in the "a discussion is not a vote" policy and the concerns that you raised were civil and challenging, so I thank you for that. --Amir E. Aharoni 23:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Nehrams2020 RfA Thanks
Thank you for your participation in my RfA, which closed successfully with unanimous support. I appreciate you taking the time to stop by and vote and I can't wait to learn the new tools and further immerse myself into Wikipedia! Please don't hesitate to point out any errors I make so I can prevent them from occurring again. I'm always here to help, so if you ever need anything, just let me know. Also, thanks to Wizardman for nominating me and for guiding many other editors to become admins. Again, thank you and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 06:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Fabrictramp RFA
Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship, which passed with 50 supports, 1 neutral, and 1 oppose. My goal is to keep earning your trust every time I grab the "mop". (And I'm always open to constructive criticism and advice!) Again, thanks. --Fabrictramp 15:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Three Revert
Are you honestly quoting policy at me? Come on, man, you know me. Whatever happened to giving established editors the benefit of the doubt? My reverts are exclusively to improve the article. I'm not going to apologize for violating the rule, as I did it in the best interest of the article and the project. I'll revert my edits, but someone else needs to clean up after me. GlassCobra 02:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I highly doubt I'll be banned for acting in the best interest of the project. I may have broken the letter of the law, but I was still upholding it in spirit. My annoyance with you stems merely from you unnecessarily quoting policy at me, a user who has not only read the policy, but warned others in the past about it. GlassCobra 02:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure. I know you had good intentions. GlassCobra 00:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Hex Deflection
All done. Go for it. GlassCobra 02:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey Malinaccier, this is doublee1992... i really dunno what to do soo... talk to me sometime... ttyl

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)