User talk:Malkawi99

Welcome!
Hello, Malkawi99. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.--مصعب (talk) 12:09, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (List of people from Irbid) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating List of people from Irbid, Malkawi99!

Wikipedia editor Icewhiz just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Needs sources. Red-links (not existing articles) in list should be considered."

To reply, leave a comment on Icewhiz's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Icewhiz (talk) 19:48, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for this information Malkawi99 (talk) 20:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Malka, Jordan) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Malka, Jordan, Malkawi99!

Wikipedia editor Icewhiz just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Notable figures here possibly questionable, sources required for rest of the article (you are sourcing the people, not the actual content on the town)."

To reply, leave a comment on Icewhiz's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Icewhiz (talk) 19:53, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for this information Malkawi99 (talk) 20:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

 * If you wish to request an unblock, do so here per the above notice.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:52, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

January 2021

 * I'm sorry to bother you with our wiki-drama, but do you have any input on this editor's behavior on Arabic Wikipedia? Our unblocking process encourages blocked editors to contribute to sister projects, which counts in their favor. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, hope you are doing well, and I am happy to help We faced the same issue with Malkawi99 at Arabic Wikipedia before 3 years, and blocked him three times on arwiki. After talking with him, we found that all of his "wrong/bad" edits were caused by his lack of knowledge of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, so some arwiki users helped him to understand these policies, and actually his contributions have improved greatly since the beginning of 2019 and he is now an active contributor on Arabic Wikipedia. Best -- Alaa )..! 11:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Malkawi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malkawi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Malkawi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbb23 (talk) 16:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Al-Wad Sayed Al-Shaghal moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Al-Wad Sayed Al-Shaghal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Al-Wad Sayed Al-Shaghal has been accepted
 Al-Wad Sayed Al-Shaghal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Al-Wad_Sayed_Al-Shaghal help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Cerebellum (talk) 09:33, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ramez Movie Star, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presenter. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Reminder to mark as completed
Hey there, I just wanted to post this to let you know that you seem to have implemented a semi-protected edit request at 7 April 2022 over at Talk:Jean-Claude Van Damme but you didn't mark the request as answered. You can do so by changing the  parameter on the edit request from 'no' to 'yes'. Doing so will make sure other editors aren't stumbling across the edit request looking to implement it only to find it's already been implemented. It's also courteous to leave a message on the edit request that it's been implemented by you and I believe it's mandatory to include attribution in the edit summary such as "Implementing edit request by  - " because of copyright reasons.

Of course it's also totally possible that you didn't see the edit request and just implemented the change on your own accord, in which case you can ignore this message.

Thanks anyway for the contribution(s) and all the best. ★Ama  TALK   CONTRIBS  13:32, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ameer Al-Thalaam


The article Ameer Al-Thalaam has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "I see that you are senior editor than me. But, the page you created today seem not to fullfill Wikipedias notablity criteria that it is much of Origional research, no adequate indepth reference presented to show the nitability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Instant History (talk) 21:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Sohaib Al-Malkawi
Hello Malkawi99, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sohaib Al-Malkawi, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Sohaib Al-Malkawi.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Clear friend  a  💬  02:14, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

user top icons
Hello. You don't have the access (WP:FMV, WP:RPC and WP:RBK) set on your user page. Please read WP:UP Claggy (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)


 * @Claggy I think I added them by mistake years ago. However, I just removed them. Thanks! Malkawi99 (talk) 15:03, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Claggy (talk) 13:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wives of Hussein of Jordan


The article Wives of Hussein of Jordan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Content fork from Hussein of Jordan. Details are already in other articles. Unnecessary duplication."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrKay (talk) 15:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Wives of Hussein of Jordan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wives of Hussein of Jordan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wives of Hussein of Jordan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. DrKay (talk) 05:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)