User talk:Mallika nawal

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! bonadea contributions talk 09:13, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Religio-Marketing


The article Religio-Marketing has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * neologism which does not appear to have a wide usage

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bonadea contributions talk 09:13, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of interest issues
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. --bonadea contributions talk 09:13, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brand Religion and Brand Religiosity


The article Brand Religion and Brand Religiosity has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * neologism which does not appear to have any widespread usage

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bonadea contributions talk 09:31, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Religion and marketing


The article Religion and marketing has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * this says very little, and is either platitude or original research; also, it is part of a set of articles by M. Nawal designed to promote her new book, but Wikipedia is not for self-promotion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 13:56, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of articles
Dear Editorial team,

I have read the proposed deletion sections and agree with it. Regret the inconvenience caused. Please feel free to delete the pages. And I assure you that my editing work in the future will not pertain to promoting either myself or my associates.

Regret the inconvenience again.

Regards, Mallika nawal (talk) 06:26, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Mallika Nawal
 * No need to apologise: Wikipedia is good at encouraging everyone to contribute, but less good at explaining what is and isn't acceptable, so that regrettably often a new contributor's first experience is the disagreeable one of having a contribution rejected. I have been thinking of proposing that when a new account is registered the user should have to read, and maybe click a box to say "I have read and understood", a shortened version of the rather long list of What Wikipedia is not. My own view is that that would be more friendly to a newcomer than allowing him or her to make a contribution and then rejecting it; but I doubt if it will be accepted, because the culture of "encourage everyone to edit, don't put any obstacles in their way" is very strong. I hope you will not be discouraged from continuing to contribute: the links in the Welcome paragraph above will be helpful. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 08:33, 16 August 2009 (UTC)